Kirks B A, Wolff H K
J Am Diet Assoc. 1985 Mar;85(3):328-31.
Plate waste studies have traditionally been used to evaluate behavior change in nutrition education programs. Identical menus are served both before and after the implementation of curriculum. Theoretically, students will internalize nutrition information, and there will be less waste in the post-test phase. In this study, two methods for determining plate waste were compared using 343 students from six schools in a pretest/post-test treatment vs. control group design. One method consisted of actual weighing of waste using gram scales. The second method utilized visual estimation of the waste expressed on a 6-point scale. Correlations between the two methods were high. However, when statistical analysis was done to determine differences between groups, it was found that the visual estimation method was not always so sensitive in detecting differences as was the weighed food method. The visual method was also found to be more difficult to interpret. It is suggested that while there are advantages to the visual estimation method, its use be limited to informal studies in which broad generalizations will not be made as to the effectiveness of nutrition education programs.
餐盘浪费研究传统上一直被用于评估营养教育项目中的行为变化。在课程实施前后提供相同的菜单。理论上,学生将内化营养信息,并且在测试后阶段浪费会减少。在本研究中,采用前测/后测处理组与对照组设计,对来自六所学校的343名学生使用两种确定餐盘浪费的方法进行了比较。一种方法是使用克秤实际称量浪费的食物。第二种方法是利用6分制对浪费情况进行视觉估计。两种方法之间的相关性很高。然而,当进行统计分析以确定组间差异时,发现视觉估计方法在检测差异方面并不总是像称重食物法那样敏感。还发现视觉方法更难解释。建议虽然视觉估计方法有其优点,但它的使用应仅限于非正式研究,在这类研究中,不会就营养教育项目的有效性做出广泛的概括。