Suppr超能文献

比较性突破:脐带间充质干细胞与骨髓间充质干细胞在心力衰竭治疗中的比较

Comparative breakthrough: Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in heart failure treatment.

作者信息

Li Peng

机构信息

Department of Geriatics, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

World J Cardiol. 2024 Dec 26;16(12):776-780. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i12.776.

Abstract

In this article, we evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from bone marrow (BM-MSCs) and umbilical cord (UC-MSCs) in the treatment of heart failure and myocardial infarction. MSCs have gained importance as living bio drug due to their regenerative potential, with BM-MSCs being the most extensively studied. However, UC-MSCs offer unique advantages, such as noninvasive collection and fewer ethical concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes data from 13 randomized controlled trials, which included a total of 693 patients. Their study shows that UC-MSCs significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction by 5.08% at 6 months and 2.78% at 12 months compared with controls, while BM-MSCs showed no significant effect. Neither cell type showed significant changes in 6-minute walk distance. In addition, UC-MSCs and BM-MSCs had comparable safety profiles, with no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events, except for a lower rehospitalization rate observed with BM-MSCs. These results position UC-MSCs as a promising alternative in MSC-based therapies for cardiac disease, offering potential improvements in cardiac function while maintaining a favorable safety profile. Future research should focus on optimizing administration protocols and further exploring the long-term benefits and mechanisms of UC-MSCs in cardiac repair.

摘要

在本文中,我们评估了源自骨髓的间充质干细胞(BM-MSCs)和脐带间充质干细胞(UC-MSCs)在治疗心力衰竭和心肌梗死方面的相对疗效和安全性。由于其再生潜力,间充质干细胞作为一种活性生物药物已变得越来越重要,其中BM-MSCs是研究最为广泛的。然而,UC-MSCs具有独特的优势,如采集无创且伦理问题较少。这项系统评价和荟萃分析总结了13项随机对照试验的数据,这些试验共纳入了693例患者。他们的研究表明,与对照组相比,UC-MSCs在6个月时显著提高左心室射血分数5.08%,在12个月时提高2.78%,而BM-MSCs则无显著效果。两种细胞类型在6分钟步行距离方面均未显示出显著变化。此外,UC-MSCs和BM-MSCs具有相当的安全性,在主要不良心脏事件方面无显著差异,只是BM-MSCs的再住院率较低。这些结果表明,UC-MSCs在基于间充质干细胞的心脏病治疗中是一种有前景的替代方案,在维持良好安全性的同时,有望改善心脏功能。未来的研究应集中在优化给药方案,并进一步探索UC-MSCs在心脏修复中的长期益处和机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae3c/11669972/701f437479eb/WJC-16-776-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验