• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Experience in developing and implementing the self-directed learning assessment tools among undergraduate medical students.在本科医学生中开发和实施自主学习评估工具的经验。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2024 Dec;80(Suppl 1):S204-S209. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Learning together for mental health: feasibility of measures to assess a whole-school mental health and wellbeing intervention in secondary schools.共同学习促进心理健康:评估中学全校心理健康与幸福干预措施的可行性
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 25:1-18. doi: 10.3310/GFDT2323.
7
Effectiveness of integrated self-directed learning in the form of case-based learning to promote active learning among second-year MBBS students.以基于案例的学习形式进行的综合自主学习在促进医学学士二年级学生主动学习方面的有效性。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 May 30;14:208. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_683_24. eCollection 2025.
8
Factors associated with self-directed learning among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review.本科护生自主学习能力相关因素的系统评价
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Sep;104:104998. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104998. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
9
Instruments evaluating the self-directed learning abilities among nursing students and nurses: a systematic review of psychometric properties.评估护生和护士自主学习能力的工具:心理测量学特性的系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 25;17(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1072-3.
10
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the landscape: A comprehensive exploration of health care professionals' readiness and perceptions toward implementing self-directed learning in Indian healthcare institutions.审视现状:对印度医疗机构中医疗保健专业人员在实施自主学习方面的准备情况和看法进行全面探索。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Feb 28;14:82. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_530_24. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-directed Learning Theory to Practice: A Footstep towards the Path of being a Life-long Learne.自我导向学习:从理论到实践——迈向终身学习者之路的一步
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022 Jul;10(3):135-144. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2022.94833.1609.
2
Changing Assessment Scenarios: Lessons for Changing Practice.不断变化的评估场景:改变实践的经验教训。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2021 Oct-Dec;11(4):206-213. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_334_21. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
Best Practices in Peer Assessment: Training Tomorrow's Physicians to Obtain and Provide Quality Feedback.同行评估的最佳实践:培养未来医生获取和提供高质量反馈的能力。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Aug 25;11:571-578. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S250761. eCollection 2020.
4
Peer assessment to improve medical student's contributions to team-based projects: randomised controlled trial and qualitative follow-up.同伴评估提高医学生团队项目贡献:随机对照试验和定性随访。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1783-8.
5
Innovative Assessment That Combines Collaborative and Self-Directed Learning With Integration and Application of Knowledge: Teamwork Group Projects.将协作式和自主式学习与知识整合及应用相结合的创新评估:团队合作小组项目。
MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Sep 16;12:10452. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10452.
6
Self-directed learning readiness of Indian medical students: a mixed method study.印度医学生自主学习能力的研究:混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jun 8;18(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1244-9.
7
Instruments evaluating the self-directed learning abilities among nursing students and nurses: a systematic review of psychometric properties.评估护生和护士自主学习能力的工具:心理测量学特性的系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 25;17(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1072-3.
8
Assessing Medical Student Professionalism: An Analysis of a Peer Assessment.评估医学生的职业素养:一项同行评估分析
Med Educ Online. 2006 Dec;11(1):4587. doi: 10.3402/meo.v11i.4587.
9
The relationship between assessment methods and self-directed learning readiness in medical education.医学教育中评估方法与自主学习准备度之间的关系。
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Mar 11;7:75-80. doi: 10.5116/ijme.56bd.b282.
10
Peer-assessment of medical communication skills: the impact of students' personality, academic and social reputation on behavioural assessment.学生个性、学业和社会声誉对行为评估的影响:医学沟通技能的同伴评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Sep;92(3):346-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

在本科医学生中开发和实施自主学习评估工具的经验。

Experience in developing and implementing the self-directed learning assessment tools among undergraduate medical students.

作者信息

Dulloo Puja, Singh Suman, Patel Minal, Singh Praveen, Dongre Amol, Vedi Neeraj

机构信息

Professor (Physiology), PSMC, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.

Professor & Head (Medical Education), PSMC, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Med J Armed Forces India. 2024 Dec;80(Suppl 1):S204-S209. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.04.002
PMID:39734880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11670526/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The upcoming changes in digital technology have motivated health professionals to be lifelong learners and be updated with the recent trends. Self-directed learning (SDL) is one of the approaches for making undergraduate students health/ profession students lifelong learners. Moreover, the SDL approach allows learners to work in a team and gain social skills. The aim of the study was to develop and validate the facilitator and peer score sheet as an assessment tool for self-directed learning in the department of physiology, in the Indian context.

METHOD

The facilitator and peer score sheet was developed and validated by the Delphi technique. The score sheet was implemented as a pilot test for one of the SDL modules in the department of physiology for undergraduate students.

RESULT

Two Delphi rounds were conducted till the content validity index (CVI) for the Facilitator Score Sheet (FSS), for 10 items attained was 0.977 and a CVI of 0.90 for seven items was for the Peer Score Sheet (PSS). The Coefficient of Variance (CV) in FSS for items 6, 10, and 11 and in PSS for item 6 was more than 30, which is not acceptable, so the item needed to be modified or removed from the list.

CONCLUSION

Varied assessment strategies are required for the SDL module to attain academic gain as per cognitive and affective attributional gains. Although novel, the present scale needs to be modified after incorporating all the recommendations from different stakeholders before reusing it for the students' SDL module.

摘要

背景

数字技术即将发生的变革促使健康专业人员成为终身学习者,并跟上最新趋势。自主学习(SDL)是使本科生/专业学生成为终身学习者的方法之一。此外,自主学习方法使学习者能够团队协作并获得社交技能。本研究的目的是在印度背景下,开发并验证促进者和同伴评分表,作为生理学系自主学习的评估工具。

方法

通过德尔菲技术开发并验证促进者和同伴评分表。该评分表在生理学系针对本科生的一个自主学习模块中进行了试点测试。

结果

进行了两轮德尔菲调查,直到促进者评分表(FSS)10项内容的内容效度指数(CVI)达到0.977,同伴评分表(PSS)7项内容的CVI为0.90。FSS中第6、10和11项以及PSS中第6项的变异系数(CV)超过30,这是不可接受的,因此需要对该项目进行修改或从列表中删除。

结论

自主学习模块需要采用多种评估策略,以根据认知和情感归因收获实现学业进步。尽管本量表新颖,但在纳入不同利益相关者的所有建议后,需要进行修改,然后才能重新用于学生的自主学习模块。