Finney Nicole, Slomoff Remy, Cervantes Brit, Dunn Natassia, Strutner Sami, Martinez Crystall, Vu Jeffrey, Naidu Ajanta, Hanami Dylan, Billimek John
School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Gender Diversity Program, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
Transgend Health. 2024 Dec 16;9(6):533-543. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2023.0051. eCollection 2024 Dec.
There are no standardized chest binding guidelines available to health care providers serving transgender and nonbinary individuals, exacerbating the significant health disparities affecting this community. Our study aimed to demonstrate the need for further evidence-based investigations into the association between chest binder type and health outcomes.
For this cross-sectional observational study, a community-engaged online survey evaluating individuals' experiences with their current or most recent chest binder was distributed to LGBTQ+ community centers, online forums, and clinics from July to November 2021. Participants rated their frequency of health outcomes in terms of both positive and negative changes, and the average score was calculated.
Of 197 participants, 80% reported using commercial binders as their current or most recent binder type. Users of commercial binders reported significantly more positive mental health changes than noncommercial binders (=0.043). There was no statistically significant association between negative outcomes and the binder category (=0.595). Musculoskeletal complaints were more frequent with commercial binders. The frequency of skin changes was higher with noncommercial binders; however, acne was higher with commercial binders.
Our results suggest that the positive mental health changes associated with chest binding outweigh the negative side effects. However, the contrariety of adverse effects among binding methods suggests that chest binding must be evaluated by individual binder type rather than as a general practice. These findings will help providers guide conversations to identify which binder is best for each unique patient, as well as encourage future research in chest binding best practices.
为跨性别者和非二元性别者提供服务的医疗保健人员没有可遵循的标准化束胸指南,这加剧了影响该群体的严重健康差异。我们的研究旨在证明有必要对束胸类型与健康结果之间的关联进行进一步的循证调查。
在这项横断面观察性研究中,2021年7月至11月期间,向 LGBTQ+ 社区中心、在线论坛和诊所发放了一份社区参与的在线调查问卷,评估个人使用当前或最近束胸产品的体验。参与者对健康结果的积极和消极变化频率进行评分,并计算平均分。
在197名参与者中,80% 报告使用商业束胸产品作为他们当前或最近的束胸类型。与非商业束胸产品使用者相比,商业束胸产品使用者报告的心理健康积极变化显著更多(=0.043)。负面结果与束胸产品类别之间没有统计学上的显著关联(=0.595)。使用商业束胸产品时肌肉骨骼不适更常见。非商业束胸产品导致皮肤变化的频率更高;然而,商业束胸产品导致痤疮的情况更多。
我们的结果表明,与束胸相关的心理健康积极变化超过了负面影响。然而,不同束胸方法之间不良反应的差异表明,必须根据束胸产品的类型而非一概而论地评估束胸情况。这些发现将有助于医疗保健人员指导相关讨论,以确定哪种束胸产品最适合每个独特的患者,并鼓励未来对束胸最佳实践进行研究。