• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同阈值和体素下CBCT重建牙齿模型的评估及其与IOS数据融合的准确性:一项体外验证研究。

Evaluation of CBCT reconstructed tooth models at different thresholds and voxels and their accuracy in fusion with IOS data: an in vitro validation study.

作者信息

Zhang Yusong, Liu Yixin, Liu Tianqi, Zhang Jiahao, Lin Peiying, Liu Dongxu

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Jinan, China.

Department of Sociology, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1571. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05395-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-05395-z
PMID:39736564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11684253/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the impact of different thresholds and voxel sizes on the accuracy of Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) tooth reconstruction and to assess the accuracy of fused CBCT and intraoral scanning (IOS) tooth models using curvature continuity algorithms under varying thresholds and voxel conditions.

METHODS

Thirty-two isolated teeth were digitized using IOS and CBCT at two voxel sizes and five threshold settings. Crown-root fusion was performed using a curvature continuity algorithm. Volume, surface area, and crown width of tooth models were compared to laser scanning models, and RMS error was measured. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, paired t-test, and one-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

Volume amplification errors of CBCT with 0.15 mm and 0.3 mm voxels ranged from 1.22 to 19.07%, surface area errors from 0.18 to 7.78%, crown linearity errors ranged from 2.47 to 7.69%, root linearity errors ranged from - 1.02 to 2.26% and RMS from 0.0691 mm to 0.2408 mm. Crown-root fusion of IOS and CBCT data reduced volume error to -0.90-5.10%, surface area error to -0.66-4.15%, and RMS to 0.0359 mm to 0.0945 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Voxel size and threshold settings significantly affect the accuracy of CBCT reconstruction and crown-root fusion. Smaller voxel sizes yield higher reconstruction precision, and different voxel sizes and tooth regions correspond to distinct optimal segmentation thresholds. The validated semi-automated crown-root fusion algorithm significantly enhances overall model accuracy, offering new possibilities for clinical applications.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估不同阈值和体素大小对锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)牙齿重建准确性的影响,并评估在不同阈值和体素条件下,使用曲率连续性算法融合CBCT和口腔内扫描(IOS)牙齿模型的准确性。

方法

使用IOS和CBCT在两种体素大小和五种阈值设置下对32颗离体牙进行数字化处理。使用曲率连续性算法进行冠根融合。将牙齿模型的体积、表面积和冠宽度与激光扫描模型进行比较,并测量均方根误差(RMS)。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验、配对t检验和单因素方差分析对数据进行分析。

结果

体素大小为0.15毫米和0.3毫米的CBCT的体积放大误差范围为1.22%至19.07%,表面积误差范围为0.18%至7.78%,冠线性误差范围为2.47%至7.69%,根线性误差范围为-1.02%至2.26%,RMS范围为0.0691毫米至0.2408毫米。IOS和CBCT数据的冠根融合将体积误差降低至-0.90%至5.10%,表面积误差降低至-0.66%至4.15%,RMS降低至0.0359毫米至0.0945毫米。

结论

体素大小和阈值设置显著影响CBCT重建和冠根融合的准确性。较小的体素大小产生更高的重建精度,不同的体素大小和牙齿区域对应不同的最佳分割阈值。经过验证的半自动冠根融合算法显著提高了整体模型准确性,为临床应用提供了新的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/7269f58f6e53/12903_2024_5395_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/dc53a4aa75f5/12903_2024_5395_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/4d730316e115/12903_2024_5395_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/1d6da5b2147d/12903_2024_5395_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/1cf0fe065b41/12903_2024_5395_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/721f6067f2eb/12903_2024_5395_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/419e282ff86b/12903_2024_5395_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/7269f58f6e53/12903_2024_5395_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/dc53a4aa75f5/12903_2024_5395_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/4d730316e115/12903_2024_5395_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/1d6da5b2147d/12903_2024_5395_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/1cf0fe065b41/12903_2024_5395_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/721f6067f2eb/12903_2024_5395_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/419e282ff86b/12903_2024_5395_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ff/11684253/7269f58f6e53/12903_2024_5395_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of CBCT reconstructed tooth models at different thresholds and voxels and their accuracy in fusion with IOS data: an in vitro validation study.不同阈值和体素下CBCT重建牙齿模型的评估及其与IOS数据融合的准确性:一项体外验证研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1571. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05395-z.
2
Accuracy of in vitro mandibular volumetric measurements from CBCT of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings.不同体素大小和不同分割阈值设置的 CBCT 在下颌容积测量中的体外准确性。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Sep 4;19(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0891-5.
3
Validation of a novel tool for automated tooth modelling by fusion of CBCT-derived roots with the respective IOS-derived crowns.通过将CBCT衍生的牙根与相应的IOS衍生的牙冠融合来验证一种新型自动牙齿建模工具。
J Dent. 2025 Feb;153:105546. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105546. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
4
Accuracy of in-vitro tooth volumetric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography.体外牙体容积测量的准确性:来自锥形束计算机断层扫描。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Dec;142(6):879-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.020.
5
Accuracy evaluation of dental CBCT and scanned model registration method based on pulp horn mapping surface: an in vitro proof-of-concept.基于牙髓角映射面的口腔锥形束 CT 与扫描模型配准方法的准确性评估:体外概念验证。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):827. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04565-3.
6
Evaluation of the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography image segmentation of isolated tooth roots based on the dynamic threshold method.基于动态阈值法的孤立牙根锥形束 CT 图像分割准确性评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 13;23(1):752. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03423-y.
7
Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans.通过单锥束 CT 牙冠重叠和连续口内扫描监测牙模根移动。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Mar;145(3):399-409. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.011.
8
Three-dimensional monitoring of root movement during orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗中根移动的三维监测。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Jan;147(1):132-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.010.
9
A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images.一种利用容积锥形束 CT 图像测量每个全牙近远中向倾斜角和颊舌向倾斜角的新方法。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jul;142(1):133-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.027.
10
Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.两种锥形束 CT 系统与全景成像在定位上颌埋伏尖牙和检测牙根吸收方面的比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Feb;33(1):93-102. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq034.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy and reliability of a three-dimensional superimposition method for maxillary jaws and dentition.一种用于上颌骨和牙列的三维叠加方法的准确性和可靠性。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):1281. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06637-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of a novel AI-based automated multimodal image registration of CBCT and intraoral scan aiding presurgical implant planning.一种新型基于人工智能的 CBCT 和口内扫描自动多模态图像配准方法的验证,辅助术前种植体规划。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Nov;35(11):1506-1517. doi: 10.1111/clr.14338. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
Accuracy evaluation of dental CBCT and scanned model registration method based on pulp horn mapping surface: an in vitro proof-of-concept.基于牙髓角映射面的口腔锥形束 CT 与扫描模型配准方法的准确性评估:体外概念验证。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):827. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04565-3.
3
Evaluating tooth segmentation accuracy and time efficiency in CBCT images using artificial intelligence: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.
利用人工智能评估 CBCT 图像中牙齿分割的准确性和时间效率:系统评价和 Meta 分析。
J Dent. 2024 Jul;146:105064. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105064. Epub 2024 May 19.
4
Semi or fully automatic tooth segmentation in CBCT images: a review.锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像中的半自动或全自动牙齿分割:综述
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024 Apr 19;10:e1994. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1994. eCollection 2024.
5
Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in imaging the components of the periodontal phenotype.锥形束计算机断层扫描在牙周表型成分成像中的准确性。
Periodontol 2000. 2024 Mar 28. doi: 10.1111/prd.12556.
6
Assessment of CBCT gray value in different regions-of-interest and fields-of-view compared to Hounsfield unit.评估不同感兴趣区和视野下的 CBCT 灰度值与亨氏单位的关系。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Nov;52(8):20230187. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230187. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
7
Evaluation of the accuracy of intraoral scanners for complete-arch scanning: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.评价全口扫描用口内扫描仪的准确性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2023 Oct;137:104636. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104636. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
8
Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing.比较口内扫描和 CBCT 通过熔丝沉积建模和数字光处理生成数字和 3D 打印模型。
J Dent. 2023 Jan;128:104387. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104387. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
9
Deep convolutional neural network-based automated segmentation and classification of teeth with orthodontic brackets on cone-beam computed-tomographic images: a validation study.基于深度卷积神经网络的锥束计算机断层扫描图像上带正畸托槽牙齿的自动分割与分类:一项验证研究
Eur J Orthod. 2023 Mar 31;45(2):169-174. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac047.
10
Accuracy of deep learning-based integrated tooth models by merging intraoral scans and CBCT scans for 3D evaluation of root position during orthodontic treatment.基于深度学习的整合口内扫描和 CBCT 扫描的牙齿模型的准确性,用于正畸治疗中根位置的 3D 评估。
Prog Orthod. 2022 May 9;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00410-x.