Crecan Cristian Mihăiță, Ciulu-Angelescu Valeria, Morar Iancu Adrian, Lupșan Alexandru Florin, Tripon Mirela Alexandra, Tripon Mirela Alexandra, Bungărdean Denisa, Daradics Zsofia, Peștean Cosmin Petru
Department of Veterinary Anesthesiology and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj Napoca, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Department of Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj Napoca, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Open Vet J. 2024 Nov;14(11):3089-3099. doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i11.38. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
Global technological advancements have shifted equine lameness diagnostics from purely subjective assessment toward more objective, quantitative methods. Traditional gait evaluations are increasingly being supplemented by innovative technologies to enhance diagnostic accuracy.
This study aimed to determine if traditional gait assessment could be effectively complemented by quantitative measurements using an affordable, self-constructed device, the Lameness Detector 0.1, which incorporates inertial motion sensors.
A total of 42 adult sport horses diagnosed with hindleg lameness due to osteochondritis dissecans were assessed pre- and post-intra-articular anesthesia using both subjective evaluation and the Lameness Detector 0.1. Quantitative data were collected by recording electric impulses on the device's accelerometer across three axes (, , ). Statistical analysis was performed to compare pre- and post-joint block values, stratified by lameness degree, and to analyze correlations between quantitative measurements and subjective evaluations.
Significant differences were observed on the -axis ( < 0.001) between pre- and post-joint block assessments, with a decrease in impulse counts post-block. For horses scoring 2/5 and 3/5 on the AEEP scale, -axis data also showed significant variation ( < 0.05), with impulse numbers increasing as lameness scores decreased. -axis data demonstrated low specificity. Overall, the mean -axis impulse counts correlated strongly with subjective lameness scores ( ≤ 0.006 for significant correlations).
The Lameness Detector 0.1 provides a reliable and cost-effective means to complement subjective gait analysis. The quantitative data, particularly -axis impulses, correlate well with traditional lameness scores, suggesting potential value in integrating this device for enhanced diagnostic precision in equine lameness assessment.
全球技术进步已使马跛行诊断从单纯的主观评估转向更客观、定量的方法。传统步态评估越来越多地由创新技术加以补充,以提高诊断准确性。
本研究旨在确定使用一种经济实惠的自制装置——跛行检测仪0.1(其包含惯性运动传感器)进行的定量测量能否有效补充传统步态评估。
总共42匹因剥脱性骨软骨炎而被诊断为后肢跛行的成年运动马,在关节内麻醉前后分别采用主观评估和跛行检测仪0.1进行评估。通过记录该装置加速度计在三个轴( 、 、 )上的电脉冲来收集定量数据。进行统计分析以比较关节阻滞前后的值,并按跛行程度分层,同时分析定量测量与主观评估之间的相关性。
在关节阻滞前后的 轴上观察到显著差异( < 0.001),阻滞后脉冲计数减少。对于在AEEP量表上评分为2/5和3/5的马, 轴数据也显示出显著差异( < 0.05),随着跛行评分降低,脉冲数增加。 轴数据显示特异性较低。总体而言, 轴平均脉冲计数与主观跛行评分密切相关(显著相关性时 ≤ 0.006)。
跛行检测仪0.1提供了一种可靠且经济高效的方法来补充主观步态分析。定量数据,尤其是 轴脉冲,与传统跛行评分密切相关,这表明在整合该装置以提高马跛行评估诊断精度方面具有潜在价值。