Suppr超能文献

巩膜固定型与囊内人工晶状体有效晶状体位置及屈光结果的比较分析

Comparative Analysis of Effective Lens Position and Refractive Outcomes in Scleral-Fixated versus Intracapsular Intraocular Lenses.

作者信息

Trivedi Vichar, Lee Stacey, Lee Patrick S Y, Me Rao, You Qisheng, Im Jacob, Ross Bing, Tran David V, Le Kim Hoang, Malbin Brett, Lin Xihui

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Visual and Anatomical Sciences, Kresge Eye Institute/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Department of Ophthalmology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 25;18:3949-3955. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S486044. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of scleral-fixated intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted using either Yamane technique or Gore-Tex suture fixation, in comparison to intracapsular lens fixation, and to assess the efficacy of various lens formulas in achieving predicted refractive targets.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 45 eyes from 44 patients with scleral-fixated IOLs, comprising 37 Yamane eyes and 8 Gore-Tex eyes. Preoperative refractive predictions from various formulae were compared with final postoperative refraction. Outcomes assessed included effective lens position (ELP), postoperative predictive error, and changes in visual acuity. The ELP of scleral-fixated IOLs was compared with that of intracapsular IOLs in fellow eyes.

RESULTS

Average ELP for Yamane IOLs was 0.62 mm more posterior relative to intracapsular IOLs but was not significantly different for Gore-Tex IOLs. Average postoperative logMAR acuity change was significant at -1.30 (p=4.5x10) and -1.65 (p=5x10) for Yamane and Gore-Tex eyes, respectively. Mean prediction error for Yamane eyes was +0.29±1.3 D, -0.53±0.40 D, +0.80±1.4 D, and +0.43±1.4 D using Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Hill-RBF, and Hoffer QST formulas, respectively. Mean prediction error for Gore-Tex eyes was -0.37±1.24 D and +0.53±1.19 D using Barrett Universal II and Holladay formulas, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Different scleral fixation techniques result in variations in ELP compared to intracapsular IOL placement. In our hands, when using the Yamane technique, surgeons should aim for a myopic refractive target to offset hyperopic errors when employing the Barrett Universal II, Hill-RBF, or Hoffer QST formulas, and a hyperopic target when using the Holladay formula. For Gore-Tex IOLs, a slightly hyperopic target is recommended to counter myopic error when using the Barrett Universal II formula, whereas a slightly myopic target is advised with the Holladay formula to offset hyperopic error. A limitation of our study is the small sample size for patients who underwent Gore-Tex suture fixation.

摘要

目的

评估采用山根技术或戈尔特斯缝线固定植入巩膜固定人工晶状体(IOL)的效果,并与囊内晶状体固定进行比较,同时评估各种晶状体公式在实现预测屈光目标方面的有效性。

患者与方法

本研究纳入了44例患者的45只接受巩膜固定IOL植入的眼睛,其中37只采用山根技术植入,8只采用戈尔特斯缝线固定。将各种公式术前的屈光预测值与术后最终屈光值进行比较。评估的结果包括有效晶状体位置(ELP)、术后预测误差和视力变化。将巩膜固定IOL的ELP与对侧眼囊内IOL的ELP进行比较。

结果

相对于囊内IOL,山根IOL的平均ELP更靠后0.62mm,但戈尔特斯IOL的平均ELP无显著差异。山根眼和戈尔特斯眼术后平均logMAR视力变化分别为显著的-1.30(p = 4.5×10)和-1.65(p = 5×10)。山根眼使用巴雷特通用II型、霍拉迪、希尔-RBF和霍弗QST公式时的平均预测误差分别为+0.29±1.3D、-0.53±0.40D、+0.80±1.4D和+0.43±1.4D。戈尔特斯眼使用巴雷特通用II型和霍拉迪公式时的平均预测误差分别为-0.37±1.24D和+0.53±1.19D。

结论

与囊内IOL植入相比,不同的巩膜固定技术导致ELP存在差异。在我们的研究中,采用山根技术时,使用巴雷特通用II型、希尔-RBF或霍弗QST公式时,外科医生应设定近视屈光目标以抵消远视误差,而使用霍拉迪公式时应设定远视目标。对于戈尔特斯IOL,使用巴雷特通用II型公式时建议设定略远视的目标以抵消近视误差,而使用霍拉迪公式时建议设定略近视的目标以抵消远视误差。我们研究的一个局限性是接受戈尔特斯缝线固定的患者样本量较小。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验