Jiang Haowen, Tan Ju Le, Ruan Wen, Hon Jin Shing, Ismail Aidila, Lim Chee Lan, Perumal Sumathy, Koh Michelle, Sewa Duu Wen, Phua Ghee Chee, Oh Ying Zi, Ng Sue-Ann, Hong Cassandra, Low Andrea, Lim Soo Teik, Yap Jonathan
Department of Cardiology National Heart Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore.
Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore.
Pulm Circ. 2024 Dec 29;15(1):e70032. doi: 10.1002/pul2.70032. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Guidelines recommend risk stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients to guide management. There are currently several risk stratification scores available, which have largely been validated in various pulmonary hypertension registries in the West but not in Asia. We aim to study the performance of these different risk scores in PAH patients from a multi-ethnic Asian population. A retrospective review of all PAH patients from Jan 2014 to Jun 2021 from a tertiary cardiac center was performed. Mortality outcomes were obtained from national registries. Using the 2022 ESC/ERS, REVEAL Lite 2.0 and COMPERA 2.0 risk scores, patients were classified into different risk strata at baseline and at follow-up and changes in any risk strata recorded. The prognosis of patients based on these factors was compared. A total of 153 patients (mean age: 57 ± 17 years; 117 women; 94 Chinese, 33 Malay, 19 Indian) were included. All three scores showed significant difference in mortality outcomes between the different risk strata both at baseline and at follow-up ( < 0.05), with the highest risk group showing the highest mortality. Patients who worsened to or remained at intermediate/high-risk generally had a worse prognosis than those who remained stable at or improved to low-risk strata. The 2022 ESC/ERS and COMPERA 2.0 risk scores had C-statistics of 0.73 (0.58-0.88) and 0.80 (0.72-0.88), respectively, for predicting 1-year mortality. Serial risk stratification is a useful tool in prognosticating Asian PAH patients and may play an important role in guiding therapeutic management.
指南建议对肺动脉高压(PAH)患者进行风险分层以指导治疗。目前有几种风险分层评分方法,这些方法在西方的各种肺动脉高压登记处已得到很大程度的验证,但在亚洲尚未得到验证。我们旨在研究这些不同风险评分在多民族亚洲PAH患者中的表现。对一家三级心脏中心2014年1月至2021年6月的所有PAH患者进行了回顾性研究。从国家登记处获取死亡率数据。使用2022 ESC/ERS、REVEAL Lite 2.0和COMPERA 2.0风险评分,在基线和随访时将患者分为不同的风险分层,并记录任何风险分层的变化。比较基于这些因素的患者预后。共纳入153例患者(平均年龄:57±17岁;117例女性;94例中国人,33例马来人,19例印度人)。所有三种评分在基线和随访时不同风险分层之间的死亡率结果均显示出显著差异(<0.05),最高风险组的死亡率最高。病情恶化至或仍处于中/高风险的患者通常比那些保持稳定或改善至低风险分层的患者预后更差。2022 ESC/ERS和COMPERA 2.0风险评分预测1年死亡率的C统计量分别为0.73(0.58 - 0.88)和0.80(0.72 - 0.88)。连续风险分层是预测亚洲PAH患者预后的有用工具,可能在指导治疗管理中发挥重要作用。