• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多民族亚洲人群中肺动脉高压患者风险分层评分的表现

Performance of Risk-Stratification Scores for Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population.

作者信息

Jiang Haowen, Tan Ju Le, Ruan Wen, Hon Jin Shing, Ismail Aidila, Lim Chee Lan, Perumal Sumathy, Koh Michelle, Sewa Duu Wen, Phua Ghee Chee, Oh Ying Zi, Ng Sue-Ann, Hong Cassandra, Low Andrea, Lim Soo Teik, Yap Jonathan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology National Heart Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore.

Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore.

出版信息

Pulm Circ. 2024 Dec 29;15(1):e70032. doi: 10.1002/pul2.70032. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1002/pul2.70032
PMID:39737392
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11682694/
Abstract

Guidelines recommend risk stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients to guide management. There are currently several risk stratification scores available, which have largely been validated in various pulmonary hypertension registries in the West but not in Asia. We aim to study the performance of these different risk scores in PAH patients from a multi-ethnic Asian population. A retrospective review of all PAH patients from Jan 2014 to Jun 2021 from a tertiary cardiac center was performed. Mortality outcomes were obtained from national registries. Using the 2022 ESC/ERS, REVEAL Lite 2.0 and COMPERA 2.0 risk scores, patients were classified into different risk strata at baseline and at follow-up and changes in any risk strata recorded. The prognosis of patients based on these factors was compared. A total of 153 patients (mean age: 57 ± 17 years; 117 women; 94 Chinese, 33 Malay, 19 Indian) were included. All three scores showed significant difference in mortality outcomes between the different risk strata both at baseline and at follow-up ( < 0.05), with the highest risk group showing the highest mortality. Patients who worsened to or remained at intermediate/high-risk generally had a worse prognosis than those who remained stable at or improved to low-risk strata. The 2022 ESC/ERS and COMPERA 2.0 risk scores had C-statistics of 0.73 (0.58-0.88) and 0.80 (0.72-0.88), respectively, for predicting 1-year mortality. Serial risk stratification is a useful tool in prognosticating Asian PAH patients and may play an important role in guiding therapeutic management.

摘要

指南建议对肺动脉高压(PAH)患者进行风险分层以指导治疗。目前有几种风险分层评分方法,这些方法在西方的各种肺动脉高压登记处已得到很大程度的验证,但在亚洲尚未得到验证。我们旨在研究这些不同风险评分在多民族亚洲PAH患者中的表现。对一家三级心脏中心2014年1月至2021年6月的所有PAH患者进行了回顾性研究。从国家登记处获取死亡率数据。使用2022 ESC/ERS、REVEAL Lite 2.0和COMPERA 2.0风险评分,在基线和随访时将患者分为不同的风险分层,并记录任何风险分层的变化。比较基于这些因素的患者预后。共纳入153例患者(平均年龄:57±17岁;117例女性;94例中国人,33例马来人,19例印度人)。所有三种评分在基线和随访时不同风险分层之间的死亡率结果均显示出显著差异(<0.05),最高风险组的死亡率最高。病情恶化至或仍处于中/高风险的患者通常比那些保持稳定或改善至低风险分层的患者预后更差。2022 ESC/ERS和COMPERA 2.0风险评分预测1年死亡率的C统计量分别为0.73(0.58 - 0.88)和0.80(0.72 - 0.88)。连续风险分层是预测亚洲PAH患者预后的有用工具,可能在指导治疗管理中发挥重要作用。

相似文献

1
Performance of Risk-Stratification Scores for Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population.多民族亚洲人群中肺动脉高压患者风险分层评分的表现
Pulm Circ. 2024 Dec 29;15(1):e70032. doi: 10.1002/pul2.70032. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Comparison Between REVEAL Lite 2 and COMPERA 2.0 for Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.REVEAL Lite 2 与 COMPERA 2.0 在肺动脉高压风险分层中的比较。
Chest. 2024 Aug;166(2):373-387. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.052. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
3
Evaluation of the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society derived three- and four-strata risk stratification models in pulmonary arterial hypertension: introducing an internet-based risk stratification calculator.欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲呼吸学会推导的肺动脉高压三阶层和四阶层风险分层模型评估:引入基于互联网的风险分层计算器
Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Feb 21;3(2):oead012. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead012. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
The role of the TAPSE/sPAP ratio as a predictor of mortality in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Its value for patient risk stratification.TAPSE/sPAP比值在肺动脉高压患者死亡率预测中的作用:其在患者风险分层中的价值。
JHLT Open. 2024 Oct 19;7:100168. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100168. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
A comparative analysis of risk stratification tools in SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: a EUSTAR analysis.系统性硬化症相关肺动脉高压风险分层工具的比较分析:一项欧洲抗风湿病联盟系统性硬化症试验注册库(EUSTAR)分析
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Jun 1;64(6):3643-3656. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf053.
6
Comparison of Contemporary Risk Scores in All Groups of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute GoDeep Meta-Registry Analysis.各组肺动脉高压当代风险评分的比较:肺血管研究所 GoDeep 荟萃分析。
Chest. 2024 Sep;166(3):585-603. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.03.018. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
7
[Evaluation effect of COMPERA 2.0 risk assessment model on prognosis of Chinese patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension].[COMPERA 2.0风险评估模型对中国肺动脉高压患者预后的评估效果]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 May 16;103(18):1410-1416. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20221212-02625.
8
Usefulness of risk assessment tools in predicting hemodynamic outcome after balloon pulmonary angioplasty: a comparative analysis.风险评估工具在预测球囊肺动脉成形术后血流动力学结局中的作用:一项对比分析。
Postgrad Med. 2024 May;136(4):446-455. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2024.2358745. Epub 2024 May 30.
9
Simplified risk stratification for pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue disease.结缔组织病相关肺动脉高压的简化风险分层。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Dec;38(12):3619-3626. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04690-3. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
Characteristics, Prognosis, and European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society Risk Stratification in Patients With Obesity and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.肥胖与肺动脉高压患者的特征、预后以及欧洲心脏病学会和欧洲呼吸学会风险分层
Chest. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.04.008.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of the ESC/ERS 4-strata risk stratification model for pulmonary arterial hypertension with missing variables.ESC/ERS 4 分层风险分层模型在肺动脉高压伴变量缺失时的表现。
Eur Respir J. 2023 Nov 29;62(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01023-2023. Print 2023 Nov.
2
Pulmonary Hypertension Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology in Asia.亚洲肺动脉高压的定义、分类及流行病学
JACC Asia. 2022 Aug 2;2(5):538-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.04.008. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension.
2022年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲呼吸学会肺动脉高压诊断和治疗指南。
Eur Respir J. 2023 Jan 6;61(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00879-2022. Print 2023 Jan.
4
External validation of a refined four-stratum risk assessment score from the French pulmonary hypertension registry.法国肺动脉高压注册研究中一种改良的四分层风险评估评分的外部验证。
Eur Respir J. 2022 Jun 30;59(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02419-2021. Print 2022 Jun.
5
COMPERA 2.0: a refined four-stratum risk assessment model for pulmonary arterial hypertension.COMPERA 2.0:一种改良的肺动脉高压四层风险评估模型。
Eur Respir J. 2022 Jul 7;60(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02311-2021. Print 2022 Jul.
6
Advances in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension.肺动脉高压的管理进展。
J Investig Med. 2021 Oct;69(7):1270-1280. doi: 10.1136/jim-2021-002027.
7
Prevalence and clinical features of bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 mutation in Korean idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients: The PILGRIM explorative cohort.韩国特发性肺动脉高压患者骨形态发生蛋白受体 2 突变的患病率和临床特征:PILGRIM 探索性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 23;15(9):e0238698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238698. eCollection 2020.
8
Development and Validation of an Abridged Version of the REVEAL 2.0 Risk Score Calculator, REVEAL Lite 2, for Use in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.REVEAL 2.0 风险评分计算器简表的制定与验证:REVEAL Lite 2,用于肺动脉高压患者
Chest. 2021 Jan;159(1):337-346. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2069. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
9
Help-seeking patterns and funding strategies in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension on phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors: an orphan disease with effective but costly treatment.肺动脉高压患者在使用磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂时的求助模式和资金策略:一种有效但昂贵的治疗方法的罕见病。
Singapore Med J. 2021 Apr;62(4):199-203. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2020026. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
10
Retrospective Validation of the REVEAL 2.0 Risk Score With the Australian and New Zealand Pulmonary Hypertension Registry Cohort.REVEAL 2.0 风险评分的澳大利亚和新西兰肺动脉高压登记队列回顾性验证。
Chest. 2020 Jan;157(1):162-172. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.08.2203. Epub 2019 Sep 26.