• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“中心的核心”:探索患者护理技术员在美国透析护理中的作用。

"The Heart of the Center": Exploring the Role of the Patient Care Technician in US Dialysis Care.

作者信息

Urbanski Megan, Blythe Emma, Hamblin Alicia, Bender Alexis A, Hoge Courtney, Douglas-Ajayi Clarica, Rickenbach Fran, Joseph Jessica, Damron Kelli Collins, Morgan Jennifer Craft, Jaar Bernard, Plantinga Laura

机构信息

Division of Transplant, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Health Services Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Kidney Med. 2024 Nov 14;7(1):100934. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100934. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100934
PMID:39737440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11683225/
Abstract

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Dialysis patient care technicians (PCTs) provide essential, frontline care for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. We qualitatively explored perceptions of the PCT job role, responsibilities, and training among current PCTs, non-PCT dialysis staff, and patients receiving hemodialysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Focus group study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Discussions were conducted in March-May 2023 among US PCTs, non-PCT staff, and patients.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Thematic analysis was conducted using inductive and deductive strategies.

RESULTS

Seven focus groups (N = 36 participants) were conducted (3 with PCTs [n = 19], 2 with non-PCT staff [n = 6], and 2 with patients [n = 11]). Eight themes emerged: (1) value of PCT role is not reflected in job or organizational policies and structures; (2) PCTs play a flexible and often ill-defined role in dialysis clinics; (3) despite being in a position with high risk of burnout, PCTs find ways to persevere and provide high-quality care; (4) PCTs are often perceived as "helpers" or ancillary rather than an integral part of the dialysis care team; (5) PCT job training and qualifications are not standardized and often not commensurate with job expectations and responsibilities; (6) PCT-patient relationships are deeply valued, but boundaries can be fluid and become blurred because of the frequency and nature of dialysis care; (7) dialysis patients and staff are vulnerable to multilevel workplace safety issues; and (8) PCT-staff dynamics have a strong impact on employee morale, clinic efficiency, and patient satisfaction.

LIMITATIONS

Non-English-speaking participants and physicians were excluded, limiting diversity in perspectives.

CONCLUSIONS

PCTs play a multifaceted role in dialysis care that is highly valued among patients and staff but not always reflected in actual tasks performed by PCTs, training received by PCTs, or the respect afforded to PCTs. Our findings are actionable and can inform future intervention-based work aimed at improving the PCT role in US hemodialysis care.

摘要

原理与目的

透析患者护理技术员(PCTs)为接受中心血液透析的患者提供至关重要的一线护理。我们对当前的PCTs、非PCT透析工作人员以及接受血液透析的患者对PCT工作角色、职责和培训的看法进行了定性探索。

研究设计

焦点小组研究。

设置与参与者

2023年3月至5月在美国的PCTs、非PCT工作人员和患者中进行了讨论。

分析方法

采用归纳和演绎策略进行主题分析。

结果

进行了7个焦点小组讨论(N = 36名参与者)(3个小组由PCTs组成[n = 19],2个小组由非PCT工作人员组成[n = 6],2个小组由患者组成[n = 11])。出现了8个主题:(1)PCT角色的价值在工作或组织政策及结构中未得到体现;(2)PCTs在透析诊所中扮演着灵活且通常定义不明确的角色;(3)尽管处于职业倦怠风险较高的岗位,但PCTs仍找到坚持下去并提供高质量护理的方法;(4)PCTs常被视为“助手”或辅助人员,而非透析护理团队的组成部分;(5)PCT工作培训和资质不规范,且往往与工作期望和职责不匹配;(6)PCT与患者的关系深受重视,但由于透析护理的频率和性质,界限可能不固定且变得模糊;(7)透析患者和工作人员容易受到多层次工作场所安全问题的影响;(8)PCT与工作人员的动态关系对员工士气、诊所效率和患者满意度有很大影响。

局限性

排除了非英语参与者和医生,限制了观点的多样性。

结论

PCTs在透析护理中扮演多方面角色,患者和工作人员对其高度重视,但这在PCTs实际执行的任务、接受的培训或获得的尊重中并不总是得到体现。我们的研究结果具有可操作性,可为未来旨在改善PCTs在美国血液透析护理中角色的基于干预的工作提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d038/11683225/b366972a6e14/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d038/11683225/b366972a6e14/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d038/11683225/b366972a6e14/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
"The Heart of the Center": Exploring the Role of the Patient Care Technician in US Dialysis Care.“中心的核心”:探索患者护理技术员在美国透析护理中的作用。
Kidney Med. 2024 Nov 14;7(1):100934. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100934. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Professional Fulfillment, Burnout, and Turnover Intention Among US Dialysis Patient Care Technicians: A National Survey.美国透析患者护理技师的专业满意度、倦怠和离职意向:一项全国性调查。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Jul;82(1):22-32.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.12.017. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
3
Cardiac Arrest in Outpatient Hemodialysis Units: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of Dialysis Technicians.门诊血液透析单位的心脏骤停:对透析技术员的全国横断面调查
Am J Kidney Dis. 2025 Jul;86(1):43-51.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.12.012. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
4
Patient Care Technician Staffing and Outcomes Among US Patients Receiving In-Center Hemodialysis.美国接受中心血液透析患者的患者护理技师人员配备和结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e241722. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1722.
5
Patient Care Technician Staffing in US Hemodialysis Facilities: An Ecological Study.美国血液透析设施中的患者护理技术员人员配备:一项生态研究。
Kidney Med. 2023 Dec 15;6(3):100782. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100782. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Improving vascular access knowledge and assessment skill of hemodialysis staff.提高血液透析工作人员的血管通路知识和评估技能。
J Osteopath Med. 2025 Jan 8;125(6):321-327. doi: 10.1515/jom-2023-0262. eCollection 2025 Jun 1.
7
Stakeholder perspectives regarding pragmatic clinical trial collateral findings.利益相关者对实用临床试验附带结果的看法。
Learn Health Syst. 2020 Aug 28;5(4):e10245. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10245. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Dementia Care Among United States Dialysis Providers: A Mixed Methods Study Evaluating Clinician Comfort and Knowledge.美国透析服务提供者的痴呆症护理:一项评估临床医生舒适度和知识水平的混合方法研究
Kidney Med. 2024 Jul 31;6(10):100884. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100884. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
Patient care staffing levels and facility characteristics in U.S. hemodialysis facilities.美国血液透析机构的患者护理人员配备水平和设施特征。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Dec;62(6):1130-40. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
10
Dialysis Patient Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey Study.COVID-19大流行期间的透析患者经历:一项调查研究。
Kidney Med. 2023 Jul;5(7):100673. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100673. Epub 2023 May 16.

本文引用的文献

1
It Is Time to Replace the Term "Patient Care Technician" in Dialysis.是时候更换透析中“患者护理技术员”这一术语了。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Aug;84(2):135-137. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.02.013. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
2
Patient Care Technician Staffing and Outcomes Among US Patients Receiving In-Center Hemodialysis.美国接受中心血液透析患者的患者护理技师人员配备和结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e241722. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1722.
3
Patient Care Technician Staffing in US Hemodialysis Facilities: An Ecological Study.美国血液透析设施中的患者护理技术员人员配备:一项生态研究。
Kidney Med. 2023 Dec 15;6(3):100782. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100782. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Professional Fulfillment, Burnout, and Turnover Intention Among US Dialysis Patient Care Technicians: A National Survey.美国透析患者护理技师的专业满意度、倦怠和离职意向:一项全国性调查。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Jul;82(1):22-32.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.12.017. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
5
Meaningful connections: An education program to enhance resident-certified nursing assistant relationships.有意义的联系:一项增强住院认证护士助理关系的教育计划。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2024 Apr-Jun;45(2):259-275. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2023.2174116. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
6
Dialysis Care around the World: A Global Perspectives Series.《全球透析护理:全球视角系列》
Kidney360. 2021 Feb 26;2(4):604-607. doi: 10.34067/KID.0001082021. eCollection 2021 Apr 29.
7
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
8
What's in a name? A technician's perspective.名字里有什么?一位技术人员的观点。
Nephrol News Issues. 2016 Aug;30(9):36.
9
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
10
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ):访谈和焦点小组的32项清单
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.