• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Is transoral robotic surgery useful as a salvage technique in head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta analysis.

作者信息

Goel Sahil, Gunasekera Delu, Krishnan Giri, Krishnan Suren, Hodge John-Charles, Lizarondo Lucylynn, Foreman Andrew

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

JBI, School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2025 Mar;47(3):1018-1036. doi: 10.1002/hed.28021. Epub 2024 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1002/hed.28021
PMID:39737644
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Residual, recurrent, and second primary head and neck cancers are on the rise. This is largely driven by a younger age at diagnosis and increasingly targeted chemoradiotherapy options. Salvage surgery remains the only curative intent option in this cohort of patients. With transoral robotic surgery (TORS), achieving good oncological and functional outcomes in primary cancer cohorts, there remains a paucity of synthesized evidence on treating residual, recurrent, or second primary disease in previously irradiated fields.

METHODS

Conducted in accordance with the JBI's methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness, three databases were searched including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. This study represents the largest systematic review till date finding 679 studies and including 15 after screening and critical appraisal. A meta-analysis of proportions and comparison was conducted using Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation statistical method and the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method, respectively.

RESULTS

Data from 515 patients was analyzed with a median follow-up time up to 47 months and a mean hospital stay of 8.5 days. Two-year overall survival (OS) rate and disease-free survival (DFS) rate were 73.8% and 56.1%, respectively. Compared to primary head and neck cancer, risk ratios for OS and DFS were 0.35 (95% CI, 0.18-0.67) and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.22-0.88). Weighted mean for tracheostomy decannulation and nasogastric dependence was 9.7 and 12.8 days, respectively, with long term tracheostomy dependence in 0%-11.5% of patients. Positive surgical margins were obtained in 19.4% with a risk ratio of 1.08 (95% CI, 0.66-1.75) when compared to primary head and neck cancer. Recurrence rate was 36% (95% CI, 24-48.9). Pooled complication rate was 32.3% with 92% of complications being classed as Clavien Dindo grade 2 or 3.

CONCLUSION

TORS is an emerging technique for salvage in recurrent, residual, and second primary head and neck cancers in previously irradiated fields. Survival outcomes are encouraging with decreased morbidity and mortality rates when compared to traditional open surgical techniques. Future studies need to mandate collection of swallowing data as a key tool to evaluate functional outcomes, deploy longer follow-up times, and address confounding factors including HPV status and prior adjuvant therapy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Is transoral robotic surgery useful as a salvage technique in head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta analysis.
Head Neck. 2025 Mar;47(3):1018-1036. doi: 10.1002/hed.28021. Epub 2024 Dec 29.
2
Feasibility of Free Flap Reconstruction Following Salvage Robotic-Assisted Resection of Recurrent and Residual Oropharyngeal Cancer in 3 Patients.3例复发性和残留性口咽癌患者在挽救性机器人辅助切除术后进行游离皮瓣重建的可行性
Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Dec;100(10_suppl):1113S-1118S. doi: 10.1177/0145561320937627. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
3
Effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery for recurrent head and neck cancers: a systematic review protocol.经口机器人手术治疗头颈部复发性肿瘤的有效性:系统评价方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Jun 1;22(6):1129-1134. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00359.
4
Salvage Transoral Robotic Surgery for Recurrent or Residual Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single Institution Experience.挽救性经口机器人手术治疗复发性或残留性头颈部鳞状细胞癌:单机构经验
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(17):7627-32. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.17.7627.
5
Role of transoral robotic surgery in current head & neck practice.经口机器人手术在当前头颈外科实践中的作用。
Surgeon. 2017 Jun;15(3):147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
6
Salvage transoral robotic surgery in recurrent oropharyngeal carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.复发性口咽癌的挽救性经口机器人手术:一项单中心回顾性研究
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jun;281(6):3167-3177. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08590-4. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
7
Complications following salvage transoral robotic surgery with and without reconstruction: A systematic review of the literature.经口机器人手术挽救治疗后出现的并发症:文献系统综述。
Oral Oncol. 2023 Oct;145:106467. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106467. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
8
Feasibility and safety of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for early hypopharyngeal cancer: a subset analysis of the Hamburg University TORS-trial.经口机器人手术(TORS)治疗早期下咽癌的可行性和安全性:汉堡大学TORS试验的亚组分析
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Oct;272(10):2993-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3259-0. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
9
Comparative safety and effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery versus open surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经口机器人手术与开放性手术治疗口咽癌的比较安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;46(4 Pt A):644-649. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.185. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
10
Salvage surgery for recurrent cancers of the oropharynx: comparing TORS with standard open surgical approaches.挽救性手术治疗口咽复发性癌:经口机器人手术与标准开放式手术方法的比较。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Aug 1;139(8):773-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3866.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular Insights into HPV-Driven Head and Neck Cancers: From Viral Oncoproteins to Precision Therapeutics.人乳头瘤病毒驱动的头颈癌的分子见解:从病毒癌蛋白到精准治疗
Viruses. 2025 Sep 20;17(9):1276. doi: 10.3390/v17091276.