Iwatani Kosuke, Urabe Fumihiko, Saito Shun, Kawano Shota, Yamasaki Tomoya, Kimura Shoji, Otsuki Hideo, Fujio Kei, Kimura Takahiro, Miki Jun
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Kashiwa Hospital, Kashiwashita 163-1, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8567, Japan.
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82531-3.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Saroa Surgical Robot System in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). We enrolled 60 patients who underwent RARP using either the Saroa (n = 9) or da Vinci Xi (n = 51) systems at Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital from January 2022 to March 2024. We compared preoperative characteristics, perioperative outcomes, complications, and postoperative urinary continence at three months between the two groups. No significant differences were found in preoperative characteristics. The Saroa group had a longer median operative time compared to the da Vinci group. Postoperative urinary continence rates were slightly lower in the Saroa group (77.8 % vs. 84.6%), though not statistically significant. When the tactile feedback function was activated, the organs were grasped with less force compared to when it was off. This study is the first to assess the Saroa system's effectiveness and safety in RARP. While the system shows promise, especially with tactile feedback that aids in delicate tissue handling, further investigation is needed to evaluate long-term oncological and functional outcomes.
评估Saroa手术机器人系统在机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)中的安全性和有效性。我们纳入了60例于2022年1月至2024年3月在东京慈惠会医科大学柏医院使用Saroa系统(n = 9)或达芬奇Xi系统(n = 51)接受RARP手术的患者。我们比较了两组患者的术前特征、围手术期结局、并发症以及术后三个月时的尿失禁情况。术前特征方面未发现显著差异。与达芬奇组相比,Saroa组的中位手术时间更长。Saroa组术后尿失禁率略低(77.8%对84.6%),但无统计学意义。当触觉反馈功能开启时,与关闭时相比,抓取器官时用力更小。本研究首次评估了Saroa系统在RARP中的有效性和安全性。虽然该系统显示出前景,尤其是其触觉反馈有助于精细组织操作,但仍需进一步研究以评估长期肿瘤学和功能结局。