Zhong Bingbing, Yan Jun, Sun Haichun, Chen Hao, Tao Baole, Jiang Yueyan, Chen Hanwen, Lu Tianci, Ding Zhichao
College of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
College of Education, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA.
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83491-4.
This study aimed to examine the relationship between personality types and conflict resolution strategies among university students. 'Personality' is a stable individual characteristic that provides a framework for explaining individual behaviors, feelings, and motivations. Moreover, the strategies that individuals choose and use when coping with conflict are also closely related to personality. In this study, a Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was conducted on 975 university students using the Chinese Congress Five Personality Inventory (CBF-PI-B) measure as an indicator to explore their personality subtypes and the Student Version of the Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory-II (ROCI-II) was utilized to measure the four types of conflict resolution strategies, namely collaboration, compliance, dominance, and avoidance. The effect of personality subtype on each strategy was examined. The best-fit model revealed three distinct personality types among university students: the dual-concern type (283 individuals), the stable type (654 individuals), and the control type (39 individuals). Dual-concern individuals had a stronger tendency to use all strategies than stable individuals and a stronger tendency to use all strategies except compliance than control individuals; stable individuals were more likely to use collaboration and avoidance strategies than control individuals. In conclusion, this study suggests that university students' propensity to use conflict resolution strategies can be meaningfully grouped based on personality type.
本研究旨在探讨大学生的人格类型与冲突解决策略之间的关系。“人格”是一种稳定的个体特征,为解释个体行为、情感和动机提供了一个框架。此外,个体在应对冲突时选择和使用的策略也与人格密切相关。在本研究中,对975名大学生进行了潜在剖面分析(LPA),以中国大五人格量表简版(CBF-PI-B)作为指标来探索他们的人格亚型,并使用拉希姆组织冲突量表第二版学生版(ROCI-II)来测量四种冲突解决策略,即合作、顺从、支配和回避。研究考察了人格亚型对每种策略的影响。最佳拟合模型揭示了大学生中三种不同的人格类型:双重关注型(283人)、稳定型(654人)和控制型(39人)。双重关注型个体比稳定型个体更倾向于使用所有策略,比控制型个体更倾向于使用除顺从之外的所有策略;稳定型个体比控制型个体更有可能使用合作和回避策略。总之,本研究表明,大学生使用冲突解决策略的倾向可以根据人格类型进行有意义的分组。