• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按需使用单一吸入器中的吸入性糖皮质激素-福莫特罗与分别使用吸入性糖皮质激素-沙丁胺醇作为缓解治疗用于轻度小儿哮喘的成本效用分析

As-Needed Inhaled Corticosteroid-Formoterol in a Single Inhaler Compared to Inhaled Corticosteroid-Albuterol in Separate Inhalers as Reliever Therapy in Mild Pediatric Asthma: A Cost-Utility Analysis.

作者信息

Rodríguez-Martínez Carlos E, Sossa-Briceño Monica P, Buendia Jefferson Antonio

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia.

Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, School of Medicine, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Jan;60(1):e27466. doi: 10.1002/ppul.27466. Epub 2024 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1002/ppul.27466
PMID:39739342
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Since 2019 as-needed low-dose ICS-formoterol in a single inhaler has been recommended for treatment of mild asthma in children aged more than 12 years. Alternatively, the use of ICS-albuterol has been proposed in countries where ICS-formoterol is not available or affordable. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost-utility of as-needed ICS-albuterol in separate inhalers compared to ICS-formoterol in a single inhaler as reliever therapy in pediatric patients with mild asthma living in Colombia.

METHODS

A Markov-type model was developed to estimate the costs and health outcomes of a simulated cohort of pediatric patients with mild asthma treated for 12 months. The effectiveness data and transition probabilities were obtained from relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Cost data were obtained from official databases provided by the Colombian Ministry of Health. The main outcome was the variable "quality-adjusted life-years" (QALYs).

RESULTS

The base-case analysis showed that compared with the use of as-needed ICS-albuterol in separate inhalers, the use of ICS-formoterol in a single in pediatric patients with mild asthma was associated with lower costs (US$475.51 vs. 735.33 average cost per patient) and the greatest gain in QALYs (0.9367 vs. 0.9352 QALYs on average per patient), thus leading to dominance.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the use of as-needed ICS-albuterol in separate inhalers, the use of ICS-formoterol in a single inhaler as reliever therapy is cost-effective in patients aged 12 years or more with mild asthma, because it showed a greater gain in QALYs at lower total treatment costs.

摘要

目的

自2019年起,推荐使用单剂量吸入器按需使用低剂量吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)-福莫特罗治疗12岁以上儿童的轻度哮喘。另外,在无法获得或负担不起ICS-福莫特罗的国家,有人提议使用ICS-沙丁胺醇。本研究的目的是评估在哥伦比亚,与单剂量吸入器中的ICS-福莫特罗相比,按需使用单独吸入器中的ICS-沙丁胺醇作为轻度哮喘儿科患者缓解治疗的成本效益。

方法

建立了一个马尔可夫类型模型,以估计模拟的轻度哮喘儿科患者队列接受12个月治疗的成本和健康结果。有效性数据和转移概率来自相关的随机临床试验(RCT)。成本数据来自哥伦比亚卫生部提供的官方数据库。主要结果是“质量调整生命年”(QALY)变量。

结果

基础病例分析表明,与按需使用单独吸入器中的ICS-沙丁胺醇相比,轻度哮喘儿科患者使用单剂量吸入器中的ICS-福莫特罗的成本更低(平均每位患者475.51美元对735.33美元),QALY增益最大(平均每位患者0.9367对0.9352 QALY),从而导致优势。

结论

与按需使用单独吸入器中的ICS-沙丁胺醇相比,对于12岁及以上的轻度哮喘患者,使用单剂量吸入器中的ICS-福莫特罗作为缓解治疗具有成本效益,因为它在较低的总治疗成本下显示出更大的QALY增益。

相似文献

1
As-Needed Inhaled Corticosteroid-Formoterol in a Single Inhaler Compared to Inhaled Corticosteroid-Albuterol in Separate Inhalers as Reliever Therapy in Mild Pediatric Asthma: A Cost-Utility Analysis.按需使用单一吸入器中的吸入性糖皮质激素-福莫特罗与分别使用吸入性糖皮质激素-沙丁胺醇作为缓解治疗用于轻度小儿哮喘的成本效用分析
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Jan;60(1):e27466. doi: 10.1002/ppul.27466. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
2
Single inhaler combination inhaled corticosteroid-formoterol as both maintenance and reliever (SMART) compared with a step up of treatment with fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroid-long-acting β2-agonist maintenance with a short-acting β2-agonist as reliever in adolescents and adults with poorly controlled asthma in Colombia: a cost-utility analysis.在哥伦比亚,将单剂量吸入器联合吸入性糖皮质激素-福莫特罗作为维持和缓解药物(SMART)与逐步增加治疗方案(使用固定剂量吸入性糖皮质激素-长效β2受体激动剂维持治疗并使用短效β2受体激动剂作为缓解药物)用于哮喘控制不佳的青少年和成人的成本-效用分析。
J Asthma. 2025 Mar;62(3):500-507. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2024.2410424. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
A cost-utility analysis of single maintenance and reliever (SMART) therapy as compared to step 3 fixed-dose therapy in patients aged 12 years or more with uncontrolled asthma.12岁及以上未控制哮喘患者中,单剂量维持和缓解治疗(SMART)与第3步固定剂量治疗的成本-效用分析。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Jan;60(1):e27328. doi: 10.1002/ppul.27328. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
4
Cost-utility of as-needed ICS-formoterol versus to maintenance ICS in mild to moderate persistent asthma.按需使用 ICS-福莫特罗与维持治疗 ICS 对轻度至中度持续性哮喘的成本-效用分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Dec 5;21(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01775-1.
5
Systematic review and economic analysis of the comparative effectiveness of different inhaled corticosteroids and their usage with long-acting beta2 agonists for the treatment of chronic asthma in adults and children aged 12 years and over.不同吸入性糖皮质激素及其与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用治疗12岁及以上成人和儿童慢性哮喘比较效果的系统评价与经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(19):iii-iv, 1-360. doi: 10.3310/hta12190.
6
Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus current best practice (including inhaled steroid maintenance), for chronic asthma in adults and children.福莫特罗与布地奈德联合用于成人和儿童慢性哮喘的维持和缓解治疗与当前最佳实践(包括吸入性糖皮质激素维持治疗)的对比研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD007313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007313.pub3.
7
Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus combination inhaler maintenance for chronic asthma in adults and children.福莫特罗与布地奈德联合用于成人和儿童慢性哮喘的维持和缓解治疗与联合吸入器维持治疗的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 16;2013(12):CD009019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009019.pub2.
8
Combination fixed-dose beta agonist and steroid inhaler as required for adults or children with mild asthma.按需使用固定剂量β激动剂和类固醇吸入剂治疗轻度哮喘的成人或儿童。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 4;5(5):CD013518. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013518.pub2.
9
Cost-effectiveness of salmeterol xinafoate/fluticasone propionate combination inhaler in chronic asthma.丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗联合吸入器治疗慢性哮喘的成本效益
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 May;23(5):1147-59. doi: 10.1185/030079907x187982.
10
Beginning to Address an Implementation Gap in Asthma: Clinicians' Views of Prescribing Reliever Budesonide-Formoterol Inhalers and SMART in the United States.开始解决哮喘治疗中的实施差距问题:美国临床医生对处方缓解药物布地奈德-福莫特罗吸入剂和 SMART 的看法。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Sep;11(9):2767-2777. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.05.023. Epub 2023 May 26.