Clarke Rebecca, Brown Emily, Hay Alastair D, Mitchell Paul Mark, Ridd Matthew J, Zhu Liang, Yardley Lucy
School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Mar 27;75(753):e241-e249. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0413. Print 2025 Apr.
Rapid microbiological point-of-care tests (RM POCTs) present an opportunity to reduce antibiotic exposure and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). So far, there is limited understanding of how RM POCTs may support clinicians in primary care in the UK and how RM POCTs might be integrated into practice.
To investigate clinicians' views on how RM POCTs can influence clinical decisions and routine practice, and perspectives on how RM POCTs can impact the clinician-patient relationship.
A qualitative study was undertaken. The study was embedded in a multi-centre, individually randomised controlled efficacy trial, which evaluated the use of a multiplex RM POCT for suspected respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in primary care.
Individual interviews were conducted with 18 clinicians (GPs, = 9; advanced nurse practitioners, = 4; paramedics, = 2; trainee advanced nurse practitioner, = 1; clinical pharmacist, = 1; and emergency care practitioner, = 1). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically informed by a realist approach.
RM POCTs can guide prescribing decisions when clinicians experience diagnostic uncertainty and support communication with patients to reinforce prescribing decisions. Consequently, the perceived value of, and use of, RM POCTs varied according to clinicians' confidence in making prescribing decisions and managing patient expectations and their clinical roles. The costly and time-consuming nature of RM POCTs meant that integration of the tests into routine practice was considered unlikely at present.
The findings from this study highlight the potential benefits and challenges of integrating RM POCTs into routine practice. Clinicians in this study had generally favourable views towards RM POCTs. However, further RM POCT training, complementary strategies, such as communication skills training and patient education, and clear guidance on implementation should be explored to optimise RM POCT feasibility and outcomes across different primary care settings.
快速微生物即时检测(RM POCT)为减少抗生素暴露和抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)提供了契机。到目前为止,对于RM POCT如何在英国基层医疗中为临床医生提供支持以及如何融入实际诊疗,人们的了解有限。
调查临床医生对于RM POCT如何影响临床决策和常规诊疗的看法,以及对于RM POCT如何影响医患关系的观点。
开展了一项定性研究。该研究嵌入一项多中心、个体随机对照疗效试验,该试验评估了一种用于基层医疗中疑似呼吸道感染(RTI)的多重RM POCT的使用情况。
对18名临床医生进行了个体访谈(全科医生9名;高级执业护士4名;护理人员2名;实习高级执业护士1名;临床药师1名;急救从业人员1名)。访谈进行了录音,逐字转录,并采用现实主义方法进行主题分析。
当临床医生面临诊断不确定性时,RM POCT可指导处方决策,并支持与患者沟通以强化处方决策。因此,RM POCT的感知价值和使用情况因临床医生在做出处方决策、管理患者期望方面的信心以及他们的临床角色而异。RM POCT成本高且耗时,这意味着目前将其整合到常规诊疗中被认为不太可能。
本研究结果凸显了将RM POCT整合到常规诊疗中的潜在益处和挑战。本研究中的临床医生对RM POCT总体持积极态度。然而,应探索进一步的RM POCT培训、沟通技能培训和患者教育等补充策略以及明确的实施指南,以优化RM POCT在不同基层医疗环境中的可行性和效果。