Sharda Shweta, Kshtriya Pranav, Agrawal Praween Kumar, Singh Prakash, Trakroo Ajay, Joshi Anurag, Agarwal Anil, Goyal Aarti, D'Aquino Luigi, Singh Shubhra, Singh Raghuraj, Prinja Shankar
Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
UNICEF, New Delhi, India.
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 31;14(12):e086956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086956.
A digital supportive supervision (DiSS) tool was developed and implemented in Rajasthan, India, to enhance the coverage and quality of maternal health, child health and nutrition (MCHN) services. This study aims to assess the impact and cost-effectiveness of DiSS compared to traditional paper-based supportive supervision.
A quasi-experimental research design incorporating interrupted time series regression analysis will be employed to evaluate the impact of DiSS. Two districts from the high DiSS intensity group, defined as having at least 25% of the MCHN sessions supervised digitally, will be randomly selected as intervention districts. Two comparator districts will be selected from the low DiSS intensity group (less than 25% of MCHN sessions supervised digitally) after matching with intervention districts based on three indicators-female literacy, proportion of population belonging to scheduled caste or tribe and coverage of four antenatal care visits. District-level monthly data on the number of beneficiaries using MCHN services will be obtained from the state's routine health management information system. Key informants involved in supervising MCHN sessions will also be interviewed to complement the quantitative findings. A mixed micro-costing methodology, incorporating top-down and bottom-up approaches, for assessing the cost of implementing supervision in either scenario. A decision model will estimate long-term health outcomes, in the form of quality-adjusted life years (QALY), in both the intervention and comparator groups. Cost-effectiveness of DiSS will be assessed by computing the incremental cost per QALY gained in the intervention versus comparator group.
The study has been approved by the Institute Ethics Committee of the PGIMER, Chandigarh, India (IEC No. IEC-03/2023-2671). The study results will be disseminated at research conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.
印度拉贾斯坦邦开发并实施了一种数字支持性监督(DiSS)工具,以提高孕产妇健康、儿童健康和营养(MCHN)服务的覆盖范围和质量。本研究旨在评估DiSS与传统纸质支持性监督相比的影响和成本效益。
将采用纳入中断时间序列回归分析的准实验研究设计来评估DiSS的影响。从高DiSS强度组中随机选择两个区作为干预区,高DiSS强度组定义为至少25%的MCHN会议采用数字监督。在根据女性识字率、属于在册种姓或部落的人口比例以及四次产前检查的覆盖率这三个指标与干预区匹配后,从低DiSS强度组(数字监督的MCHN会议少于25%)中选择两个对照区。将从该邦的常规卫生管理信息系统获取关于使用MCHN服务的受益人数的区级月度数据。还将采访参与监督MCHN会议的关键信息提供者,以补充定量研究结果。采用混合微观成本核算方法,结合自上而下和自下而上的方法,评估两种情况下实施监督的成本。一个决策模型将估计干预组和对照组以质量调整生命年(QALY)形式的长期健康结果。通过计算干预组与对照组每获得一个QALY的增量成本来评估DiSS的成本效益。
该研究已获得印度昌迪加尔PGIMER机构伦理委员会的批准(伦理委员会编号:IEC-03/2023-2671)。研究结果将在研究会议上公布,并发表在同行评审期刊上。