Suppr超能文献

新冠病毒感染与社会经济地位导致的后期病假风险:一项队列研究

COVID-19 infection and later risk of sickness absence by socioeconomic status: a cohort study.

作者信息

Joensuu Matti, Kausto Johanna, Airaksinen Jaakko, Oksanen Tuula, Vahtera Jussi, Kivimäki Mika, Ervasti Jenni

机构信息

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, TYÖTERVEYSLAITOS, PL 18, Helsinki, 00032, Finland.

School of Medicine, Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;24(1):3622. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21148-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic was a significant health risk and resulted in increased sickness absence during the pandemic. This study examines whether a history of COVID-19 infection is associated with a higher risk of subsequent sickness absence.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 32,124 public sector employees responded to a survey on COVID-19 infection and lifestyle factors in 2020 and were linked to sickness absence records before (2019) and after (2021-2022) the survey. Study outcome was annual sickness absence defined as the total number of sickness absence days and the number of short sickness absence spells (< 10 days) and long sickness absence spells (10-365 days). We used negative binomial regression adjusting for sex, age, employment characteristics, body mass index, health behaviors in 2020 and sickness absence in 2019. We examined differences in sickness absence between socioeconomic statuses (SES), measured by occupational titles from employers' records.

RESULTS

A self-reported COVID-19 infection in 2020 was associated with higher subsequent risk of sickness absence in 2021: Adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) compared to those not reporting COVID-19 was 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.37 for sickness absence days, 1.29, 1.20-1.38 for short sickness absence spells and 1.20, 1.04-1.37 for long spells. The association was strongest in employees with intermediate SES: 1.45, 1.20-1.77 days, 1.42, 1.26-1.61 short spells, and 1.30, 1.03-1.64 long spells. For employees with low and high SES, an association was observed only for short spells.

CONCLUSIONS

Employees who reported contracting first-wave COVID-19 infection had higher rates of sickness absence in the following year. This excess risk was most consistently observed in employees with intermediate socioeconomic status (e.g. office workers, registered nurses, and social workers).

摘要

背景

新冠疫情是一项重大的健康风险,导致疫情期间病假缺勤率上升。本研究旨在探讨新冠病毒感染史是否与随后更高的病假缺勤风险相关。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,32124名公共部门员工在2020年对一项关于新冠病毒感染和生活方式因素的调查做出了回应,并与调查之前(2019年)和之后(2021 - 2022年)的病假缺勤记录相关联。研究结果是年度病假缺勤,定义为病假缺勤天数的总数、短期病假缺勤(<10天)的次数和长期病假缺勤(10 - 365天)的次数。我们使用负二项回归,并对性别、年龄、就业特征、体重指数、2020年的健康行为以及2019年的病假缺勤情况进行了调整。我们通过雇主记录中的职业头衔来衡量社会经济地位(SES),并研究了不同社会经济地位之间病假缺勤的差异。

结果

2020年自我报告的新冠病毒感染与2021年随后更高的病假缺勤风险相关:与未报告感染新冠病毒的人相比,调整后的发病率比(IRR)对于病假缺勤天数为1.23,95%置信区间(CI)为1.10 - 1.37;对于短期病假缺勤次数为1.29,95%CI为1.20 - 1.38;对于长期病假缺勤次数为1.20,95%CI为1.04 - 1.37。这种关联在中等社会经济地位的员工中最为明显:对于病假缺勤天数为1.45,95%CI为1.20 - 1.77;对于短期病假缺勤次数为1.42,95%CI为1.26 - 1.61;对于长期病假缺勤次数为1.30,95%CI为1.03 - 1.64。对于低社会经济地位和高社会经济地位的员工,仅在短期病假缺勤次数上观察到关联。

结论

报告感染第一波新冠病毒的员工在次年的病假缺勤率更高。这种额外风险在中等社会经济地位的员工(如办公室职员、注册护士和社会工作者)中最为一致地观察到。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b4d/11689563/62b23cea999c/12889_2024_21148_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验