• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科患者镇静的年龄相关特征及其相关不良事件:一项队列研究。

Age-related characteristics of sedation in pediatric patients and their correlated adverse events: a cohort study.

作者信息

Nong Xiaoling, Lu Yixing, Jiang Wenqing, Qin Yanlv, Jing Shunzhong, Chi Tao, Peng Wei, Liu Siyan, Lin Yunan

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2024 Dec 16;12:1475891. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1475891. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fped.2024.1475891
PMID:39741768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11685741/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this research was to examine the features and potential hazards of sedation in children of varying ages. Additionally, the study aimed to comprehend these variations to enhance the safety and efficacy of clinical applications.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on case data involving pediatric patients who underwent imaging procedures in outpatient settings and necessitated procedural sedation from 2022 to 2024. The research participants were categorized into three age groups: ≤1 year, 1-3 years, and 3-12 years. The primary sedative agents administered were oral midazolam in conjunction with intranasal dexmedetomidine. We examined the effects of sedation and the occurrence of adverse events across various age groups. Additionally, we applied multivariate logistic regression to identify factors linked to these adverse events.

RESULTS

The study observed 2,194 children, with 879 (40.1%) being ≤1-year-old. The ≤1-year-old group achieved faster sleep onset at 18.7 ± 0.3 min, with no significant variance in awakening time and length of stay among the groups. The incidence of adverse events varied significantly by age, with the highest rate of 12.2% in the ≤1-year-old group and the lowest rate of 9.7% in the 3-12-year-old group. Multivariate analysis revealed age as an independent factor affecting adverse event occurrence, with a relative risk ratio (AOR) of 2.21 (95% CI: 1.31-3.75) for delayed awakening in children ≤1-year-old, 15.03 (95% CI: 1.92-117.61) for hypoglycemia, and a relative risk ratio (AOR) of 4.58 (95% CI: 2.22-9.42) for receiving a significant intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variations in sedation reactions and adverse events were observed across the different age groups. Specifically, children aged ≤1 year exhibited a higher susceptibility to adverse events such as delayed awakening and hypoglycemia.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

chictr.org.cn identifier (ChiCTR2400082774).

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是检查不同年龄段儿童镇静的特点和潜在危害。此外,该研究旨在了解这些差异,以提高临床应用的安全性和有效性。

方法

对2022年至2024年在门诊接受影像检查并需要进行程序性镇静的儿科患者的病例数据进行回顾性分析。研究参与者分为三个年龄组:≤1岁、1 - 3岁和3 - 12岁。主要使用的镇静剂是口服咪达唑仑联合鼻内右美托咪定。我们检查了不同年龄组的镇静效果和不良事件的发生情况。此外,我们应用多因素逻辑回归来确定与这些不良事件相关的因素。

结果

该研究观察了2194名儿童,其中879名(40.1%)≤1岁。≤1岁组入睡更快,为18.7±0.3分钟,各组间苏醒时间和住院时间无显著差异。不良事件的发生率因年龄而异,≤1岁组最高,为12.2%,3 - 12岁组最低,为9.7%。多因素分析显示年龄是影响不良事件发生的独立因素,≤1岁儿童延迟苏醒的相对风险比(调整后比值比)为2.21(95%可信区间:1.31 - 3.75),低血糖为15.03(95%可信区间:1.92 - 117.61),接受重大干预的相对风险比(调整后比值比)为4.58(95%可信区间:2.22 - 9.42)。

结论

不同年龄组的镇静反应和不良事件存在显著差异。具体而言,≤1岁的儿童对延迟苏醒和低血糖等不良事件的易感性更高。

临床试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心标识符(ChiCTR2400082774)。

相似文献

1
Age-related characteristics of sedation in pediatric patients and their correlated adverse events: a cohort study.儿科患者镇静的年龄相关特征及其相关不良事件:一项队列研究。
Front Pediatr. 2024 Dec 16;12:1475891. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1475891. eCollection 2024.
2
The effect of age on outpatient pediatric procedural sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam.年龄对鼻内用右美托咪定和口服咪达唑仑行门诊儿科操作性镇静的影响。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jan;183(1):169-177. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05240-5. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
3
Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children.水合氯醛作为镇静剂在儿科神经诊断中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD011786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011786.pub3.
4
Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children.水合氯醛作为儿童神经诊断程序中的镇静剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD011786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011786.pub2.
5
Effect of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine or Midazolam for Premedication on the Occurrence of Respiratory Adverse Events in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.鼻腔内给予右美托咪定或咪达唑仑作为预给药对行扁桃体切除术和腺样体切除术的儿童发生呼吸不良事件的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2225473. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25473.
6
Oral midazolam vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine plus oral midazolam for sedation of pediatric outpatients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.口腔咪达唑仑与鼻内右美托咪定联合口腔咪达唑仑在儿科门诊镇静中的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Oct 10;23(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02289-5.
7
Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation.鼻内或口服氯胺酮-咪达唑仑联合用药与口服咪达唑仑用于门诊儿科镇静的随机临床试验比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 11;14(3):e0213074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213074. eCollection 2019.
8
Efficacy of intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine in combination with midazolam for sedation in infant with cleft lip and palate undergoing CT scan: a randomized controlled trial.鼻腔内给予右美托咪定联合咪达唑仑镇静在唇腭裂婴儿 CT 扫描中的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02397-2.
9
Combined use of intranasal Dexmedetomidine and an oral novel formulation of Midazolam for sedation of young children during brain MRI examination: a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial.经鼻给予右美托咪定联合口服咪达唑仑新剂型在小儿脑 MRI 检查镇静中的应用:一项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Nov 23;22(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01897-x.
10
Comparative study of intranasal dexmedetomidine v/s midazolam for sedation of pediatric patients during transthoracic echocardiography.经胸超声心动图检查时,鼻内给予右美托咪定与咪达唑仑镇静的小儿对比研究。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2021 Apr-Jun;24(2):224-229. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_17_20.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine-esketamine sedation for pediatric acceptance of facemask: single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.鼻内给予右美托咪定-艾司氯胺酮镇静用于小儿接受面罩的效果:单中心、双盲、随机对照试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02939-w.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of age on outpatient pediatric procedural sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam.年龄对鼻内用右美托咪定和口服咪达唑仑行门诊儿科操作性镇静的影响。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jan;183(1):169-177. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05240-5. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
2
Hypoglycemia in Children: Major Endocrine-Metabolic Causes and Novel Therapeutic Perspectives.儿童低血糖症:主要的内分泌代谢病因和新的治疗观点。
Nutrients. 2023 Aug 11;15(16):3544. doi: 10.3390/nu15163544.
3
Intranasal esketamine combined with oral midazolam provides adequate sedation for outpatient pediatric dental procedures: a prospective cohort study.
鼻内依他佐辛联合口服咪达唑仑为门诊小儿牙科手术提供充分镇静:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Jul 1;109(7):1893-1899. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000340.
4
Outpatient Sedation and Risks (Including Dental).门诊镇静与风险(包括牙科)。
Pediatr Rev. 2023 Apr 1;44(4):203-212. doi: 10.1542/pir.2022-005642.
5
Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial.口服氯膦酸和鼻内咪达唑仑与右美托咪定在儿童磁共振成像(MRI)镇静中的比较:一项开放标签、三臂、随机试验。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Mar;182(3):1385-1391. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04794-0. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
6
Procedural sedation in children for fractionated radiation treatment: Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam and ketamine.儿童分次放射治疗中的程序镇静:鼻内右美托咪定与口服咪达唑仑和氯胺酮的比较。
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Oct;66(10):687-693. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_340_22. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
7
Using intranasal dexmedetomidine with buccal midazolam for magnetic resonance imaging sedation in children: A single-arm prospective interventional study.鼻内使用右美托咪定联合口腔含服咪达唑仑用于儿童磁共振成像镇静:一项单臂前瞻性干预研究。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Aug 4;10:889369. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.889369. eCollection 2022.
8
Neonatal Glucose Homeostasis.新生儿血糖稳态。
Clin Perinatol. 2022 Jun;49(2):393-404. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
9
Impact of young age on outcomes of emergency department procedural sedation.急诊程序镇静中老年患者年龄对结局的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
10
Trends in Outpatient Procedural Sedation: 2007-2018.门诊程序镇静的趋势:2007-2018 年。
Pediatrics. 2020 May;145(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3559.