• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊程序镇静中老年患者年龄对结局的影响。

Impact of young age on outcomes of emergency department procedural sedation.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.014
PMID:33744747
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Relatively little is known about outcomes of procedural sedation in very young children. Our objective was to examine the association between procedural sedation in young children (≤ 2 years) and the incidence of sedation-related adverse events.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of children 0 to 18 years undergoing parenteral procedural sedation in six Canadian pediatric emergency departments (ED). The primary risk factor was age ≤ 2 years. Secondary risk factors were sex, procedure type, pre-procedure and sedation medications. The outcomes examined were: serious adverse events (SAE), significant interventions, oxygen desaturation and vomiting.

RESULTS

Of the 6295 patients included, 946 (15%) were ≤2 years. Children 13-24 months comprised 90% of the young age group. Children ≤ 2 years were sedated most commonly for laceration repair (n = 450; 47.6%), while orthopedic reduction was most common in children > 2 (n = 3983; 74.5%). Ketamine was the most common medication in both groups, but was used more frequently in children ≤ 2 years (80.9% vs 58.9%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in the odds of SAE (OR 0.83, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.4 to 1.9), significant intervention (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.7) or oxygen desaturation (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.3) between age groups, however children ≤ 2 years vomited less frequently (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Young age, specifically between 13 and 24 months, was not associated with a significant difference in the incidence of adverse events.

摘要

目的

关于非常年幼儿童的程序镇静的结果,人们知之甚少。我们的目的是检查幼儿(≤2 岁)进行程序镇静与镇静相关不良事件的发生率之间的关联。

方法

这是对 6 家加拿大儿科急诊室(ED)进行的儿童 0 至 18 岁接受肠外程序镇静的前瞻性队列研究的二次分析。主要危险因素是年龄≤2 岁。次要危险因素为性别、手术类型、术前和镇静药物。检查的结果是:严重不良事件(SAE)、重大干预、氧饱和度下降和呕吐。

结果

在纳入的 6295 名患者中,有 946 名(15%)≤2 岁。13-24 个月的儿童占年轻组的 90%。≤2 岁的儿童最常接受撕裂伤修复镇静(n=450;47.6%),而>2 岁的儿童最常接受骨科复位(n=3983;74.5%)。两组中最常用的药物均为氯胺酮,但在≤2 岁的儿童中更常用(80.9%比 58.9%;p<0.001)。两组之间 SAE(OR 0.83,95%置信区间(CI)0.4 至 1.9)、重大干预(OR 0.82,95% CI 0.4 至 1.7)或氧饱和度下降(OR 0.95,95% CI 0.7 至 1.3)的发生率均无差异,然而≤2 岁的儿童呕吐的频率较低(OR 0.24,95% CI 0.1 至 0.6)。

结论

年龄较小,特别是 13 至 24 个月,与不良事件发生率无显著差异相关。

相似文献

1
Impact of young age on outcomes of emergency department procedural sedation.急诊程序镇静中老年患者年龄对结局的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
2
Risk Factors for Adverse Events in Emergency Department Procedural Sedation for Children.儿童急诊科程序性镇静不良事件的危险因素
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Oct 1;171(10):957-964. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2135.
3
Safe and efficacious use of procedural sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists in a pediatric emergency department.非麻醉医生在儿科急诊科安全有效地使用程序性镇静和镇痛。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1090-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1090.
4
Association of Preprocedural Fasting With Outcomes of Emergency Department Sedation in Children.术前禁食与儿童急诊科镇静治疗结局的关系。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Jul 1;172(7):678-685. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.0830.
5
Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科程序性镇静和镇痛的不良事件
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Oct;34(4 Pt 1):483-91. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)80050-x.
6
Adverse Events During a Randomized Trial of Ketamine Versus Co-Administration of Ketamine and Propofol for Procedural Sedation in a Pediatric Emergency Department.在儿科急诊科进行的氯胺酮与氯胺酮联合丙泊酚用于程序镇静的随机试验中的不良事件。
J Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;53(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
7
Adverse events associated with procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: a comparison of common parenteral drugs.儿科急诊科与程序性镇静和镇痛相关的不良事件:常用注射药物的比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jun;12(6):508-13. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.009.
8
Incidence of adverse events in paediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急诊科儿童程序性镇静中不良事件的发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 15;6(6):e011384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011384.
9
Opioids Safety in Pediatric Procedural Sedation with Ketamine.氯胺酮在儿科操作镇静中应用的安全性。
J Pediatr. 2022 Apr;243:146-151.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.11.072. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
10
Repeat Intravenous Ketamine Dosing in Children Undergoing Emergency Department Procedural Sedation.急诊科进行程序性镇静的儿童重复静脉注射氯胺酮给药
J Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;56(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.09.047. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-related characteristics of sedation in pediatric patients and their correlated adverse events: a cohort study.儿科患者镇静的年龄相关特征及其相关不良事件:一项队列研究。
Front Pediatr. 2024 Dec 16;12:1475891. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1475891. eCollection 2024.