静观科学中最大的挑战：量身定制冥想练习。
The greatest challenge in contemplative science: tailoring meditative practices.
作者信息
Garcia-Campayo Javier, Whyte Roberto, Hijar-Aguinaga Rinchen
机构信息
Department of Psychiatry, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Department of Psychiatry, Enneagram Teacher, Madrid, Spain.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 17;15:1483342. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1483342. eCollection 2024.
Abstract
The practice of meditation has grown in popularity around the world in recent decades. However, standard and untailored meditative practices are recommended for all practitioners, regardless of their personality traits or characteristics. No scientific attempts have been made to match specific meditation types with personality. This paper summarizes the limited proposals relevant to this subject in contemplative traditions such as Buddhism and schools of humanistic and transpersonal thought, including the Enneagram. We also discuss future research directions in this field.
摘要
近几十年来，冥想练习在全球范围内越来越受欢迎。然而，目前推荐给所有练习者的都是标准的、未量身定制的冥想练习，而不考虑他们的性格特点。尚未有科学尝试将特定的冥想类型与性格相匹配。本文总结了佛教等沉思传统以及人本主义和超个人思想流派（包括九型人格）中与该主题相关的有限提议。我们还讨论了该领域未来的研究方向。
相似文献
1
The greatest challenge in contemplative science: tailoring meditative practices.静观科学中最大的挑战：量身定制冥想练习。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 17;15:1483342. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1483342. eCollection 2024.
2
Volitional mental absorption in meditation: Toward a scientific understanding of advanced concentrative absorption meditation and the case of jhana.冥想中的意志性精神专注：迈向对高级专注性禅定及禅那实例的科学理解
Heliyon. 2024 May 14;10(10):e31223. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31223. eCollection 2024 May 30.
3
Knowing the Knowing. Non-dual Meditative Practice From an Enactive Perspective.认识认知。从生成认知视角看非二元冥想练习。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 18;13:778817. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.778817. eCollection 2022.
4
Meditation research, past, present, and future: perspectives from the Nalanda contemplative science tradition.冥想研究：过去、现在和未来——那烂陀沉思科学传统的观点。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Jan;1307(1):43-54. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12273. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
5
Sustainable Compassion Training: Integrating Meditation Theory With Psychological Science.可持续慈悲训练：将冥想理论与心理科学相结合。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 11;11:2249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02249. eCollection 2020.
6
Defining Contemplative Science: The Metacognitive Self-Regulatory Capacity of the Mind, Context of Meditation Practice and Modes of Existential Awareness.定义静观科学：心灵的元认知自我调节能力、冥想练习背景与存在意识模式
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 17;7:1788. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01788. eCollection 2016.
7
A phenomenology of meditation-induced light experiences: traditional buddhist and neurobiological perspectives.冥想引起的光体验的现象学：传统佛教和神经生物学的视角。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jan 3;4:973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00973. eCollection 2014.
8
The Influence of Buddhist Meditation Traditions on the Autonomic System and Attention.佛教冥想传统对自主神经系统和注意力的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:731579. doi: 10.1155/2015/731579. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
9
A Systematic Review of Transcendent States Across Meditation and Contemplative Traditions.关于冥想和沉思传统中超越状态的系统综述。
Explore (NY). 2018 Jan-Feb;14(1):19-35. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
10
Fruits of the Buddhism-science dialogue in contemplative research.佛教-科学对话在沉思研究中的成果。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Aug;28:126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
本文引用的文献
1
Prevalence and 20-year trends in meditation, yoga, guided imagery and progressive relaxation use among US adults from 2002 to 2022.2002 年至 2022 年美国成年人中冥想、瑜伽、引导意象和渐进性放松使用的流行率和 20 年趋势。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 1;14(1):14987. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64562-y.
2
Individual differences in meditation interventions: A meta-analytic study.冥想干预的个体差异：一项荟萃分析研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2022 Sep;27(3):1043-1076. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12589. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
3
The prevalence and characteristics of yoga or meditation users in Iceland: Results of a national health survey.冰岛瑜伽或冥想使用者的患病率及特征：一项全国性健康调查的结果
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;45:101487. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101487. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
4
Contemplative sciences: A future beyond mindfulness.沉思科学：超越正念的未来。
World J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 19;11(4):87-93. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i4.87.
5
Towards an Individual Differences Perspective in Mindfulness Training Research: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations.正念训练研究中的个体差异视角：理论与实证考量
Front Psychol. 2020 May 19;11:818. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00818. eCollection 2020.
6
Personality as a predictor of well-being in a randomized trial of a mindfulness-based stress reduction of Danish women with breast cancer.人格特质作为丹麦乳腺癌女性正念减压随机试验中幸福感的预测因子。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2020 Jan-Feb;38(1):4-19. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2019.1626524. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
7
Characteristics of yoga and meditation users among older Australian women - results from the 45 and up study.在澳大利亚老年女性中瑜伽和冥想使用者的特征——45 岁及以上研究的结果。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2019 May;35:219-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
For Whom Does Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Work? Moderating Effects of Personality.基于正念的减压疗法对谁有效？人格的调节作用。
Mindfulness (N Y). 2017;8(4):1106-1116. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0687-0. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
9
Prevalence, patterns, and predictors of meditation use among US adults: A nationally representative survey.美国成年人中冥想使用的流行率、模式和预测因素：一项具有全国代表性的调查。
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 10;6:36760. doi: 10.1038/srep36760.
Zotero 插件