Eldesouky Lameese, English Tammy
Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.
J Res Pers. 2023 Aug;105. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104399. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
We tested how expression-based regulation strategies influence personality judgments in an experiment with 164 undergraduate stranger dyads. One partner suppressed or amplified their emotional expressions during a conversation. Afterwards, partners rated their own and their partner's personality. Suppressors were seen as less extraverted and warm than controls and amplifiers, while amplifiers were seen as more neurotic. Suppressors were not judged less accurately than others. However, amplifiers' warmth and extraversion were judged more accurately than controls and suppressors. Suppression and amplification largely did not impact judgments of others, except suppressors more accurately judged others' warmth than controls. Thus, suppression and amplification distinctly impacted personality judgments made about the regulators by others but had little impact on regulators' judgments.
在一项针对164对本科陌生搭档的实验中,我们测试了基于表达的调节策略如何影响个性判断。在对话过程中,一方抑制或放大了他们的情绪表达。之后,搭档们对自己和对方的个性进行了评价。与对照组和放大情绪表达的人相比,抑制情绪表达的人被认为外向性和亲和力较低,而放大情绪表达的人被认为更神经质。对抑制情绪表达的人的判断并不比其他人更不准确。然而,对放大情绪表达的人的亲和力和外向性的判断比对对照组和抑制情绪表达的人的判断更准确。除了抑制情绪表达的人比对照组更准确地判断他人的亲和力外,抑制和放大情绪表达在很大程度上并没有影响对他人的判断。因此,抑制和放大情绪表达明显影响了他人对调节者的个性判断,但对调节者自己的判断影响很小。