Faizan Ejaz Khawaja, Wani Rehan, Akbar Amna, Umaira Khan Qudsia, Ishtiaq Hifza, Amir Muhammad, Ali Amir Iqbal, Khan Shahid
Medicine, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, GBR.
Orthopaedics, Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences, Muzaffarabad, PAK.
Cureus. 2024 Dec 30;16(12):e76631. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76631. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Introduction Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain disorder characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances. The purpose of this study was to compare how well duloxetine, pregabalin, and milnacipran worked for fibromyalgia patients in terms of pain management, quality of life, and sleep quality. Methodology A prospective cohort research study with 193 fibromyalgia patients was carried out at the Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences, Muzaffarabad, Pakistan. For a total study duration of nine months, participants were prescribed milnacipran, pregabalin, or duloxetine for six months, and followed up monthly for an additional three months after completing therapy. At baseline and at the conclusion of the study, measures of pain intensity, quality of life (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, FIQ), and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) were taken. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-tests were among the statistical studies carried out. Results Significant improvements in pain, quality of life, and sleep quality were shown by all three drugs. The most significant benefits were from duloxetine, which dramatically reduced pain and improved sleep and quality of life (p < 0.05). Pregabalin was less successful at improving quality of life than it was at reducing pain and promoting better sleep. Milnacipran had less of an effect on quality of life but showed modest effectiveness in managing fatigue and reducing discomfort. Due to moderate side effects, such as nausea and dizziness, duloxetine had greater rates of discontinuation. Conclusion Duloxetine was the most effective treatment, improving pain, quality of life, and sleep quality. Pregabalin is beneficial for pain and sleep management, while milnacipran remains a viable option for those with predominant fatigue. These results support the use of these medications in fibromyalgia treatment.
引言
纤维肌痛是一种慢性疼痛疾病,其特征为广泛疼痛、疲劳和睡眠障碍。本研究的目的是比较度洛西汀、普瑞巴林和米那普明在疼痛管理、生活质量和睡眠质量方面对纤维肌痛患者的治疗效果。
方法
在巴基斯坦穆扎法拉巴德的阿巴斯医学科学研究所对193名纤维肌痛患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。在为期九个月的研究期间,参与者被处方服用米那普明、普瑞巴林或度洛西汀六个月,并在完成治疗后再进行三个月的每月随访。在基线和研究结束时,测量疼痛强度、生活质量(纤维肌痛影响问卷,FIQ)和睡眠质量(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数,PSQI)。进行的统计研究包括方差分析(ANOVA)和配对t检验。
结果
所有三种药物在疼痛、生活质量和睡眠质量方面均显示出显著改善。度洛西汀带来的益处最为显著,它能显著减轻疼痛、改善睡眠和生活质量(p < 0.05)。普瑞巴林在改善生活质量方面不如减轻疼痛和促进更好睡眠方面成功。米那普明对生活质量的影响较小,但在管理疲劳和减轻不适方面显示出一定效果。由于存在恶心和头晕等中度副作用,度洛西汀的停药率较高。
结论
度洛西汀是最有效的治疗方法,可改善疼痛、生活质量和睡眠质量。普瑞巴林对疼痛和睡眠管理有益,而米那普明对于以疲劳为主的患者仍是一个可行的选择。这些结果支持在纤维肌痛治疗中使用这些药物。