Suppr超能文献

比较认证木薯种子和农户留存木薯种子的鲜根产量及品质。

Comparing fresh root yield and quality of certified and farmer-saved cassava seed.

作者信息

Yabeja Juma W, Manoko Mkabwa L K, Legg James P

机构信息

International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Box 34441, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

College of Agriculture and Food Technology (CoAF), University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Box 23456, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

Crop Prot. 2025 Jan;187:106932. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106932.

Abstract

Formal systems supporting the delivery of high-quality cassava seed are being established in several key cassava producing countries in Africa. Questions remain, however, about the value of certified cassava seed when compared to seed which is recycled multiple times, which is standard farmer practice. A study was therefore conducted to compare fresh cassava root yields of high-quality seed (HQS) versus farmer-saved (recycled) seed (FSS) for three widely grown improved cassava varieties in Tanzania namely: , and . Field experiments were established in two sites in different agricultural zones: Mkuranga (Coast Zone) and Maruku (Lake Victoria Zone). Four HQS sources (pre-basic, basic, certified, quality-declared), collectively referred to as HQS, were compared with FSS with respect to cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) foliar and root incidences, fresh root yield, marketable fresh root yield, and usable fresh root yield for each variety in the two locations. Results showed that foliar CBSD incidence in FSS was significantly greater than it was for HQS in and varieties but not for . CBSD root incidence was on average six times more in FSS than in HQS. When comparing FSS with the specific certified seed treatment (CS), 25.8% of the roots were unusable due to CBSD root necrosis for FSS, compared to only 3.7% for CS. CS gave an overall fresh root yield which was 7.5 t/ha more than FSS, representing an 80.6% increase. Yield benefits derived from planting HQS were similar for (+80.7%), (+81.3%) and (+79.5%), as well as across each of the four HQS classes. When also considering losses arising from severe CBSD root necrosis, the overall yield benefit arising from using CS when compared to FSS was 135%. The average estimated income gain for this increase was US$ 2279/ha, which is many times the estimated cost of obtaining certified seed. These results highlight the value of high quality seed systems and the potential gains that farmers can realize from planting high quality certified seed rather than recycling existing crops.

摘要

非洲几个主要木薯生产国正在建立支持提供高质量木薯种子的正规体系。然而,与农民多次循环使用种子(这是农民的标准做法)相比,认证木薯种子的价值仍存在疑问。因此,开展了一项研究,比较坦桑尼亚广泛种植的三个改良木薯品种,即[品种一]、[品种二]和[品种三],使用高质量种子(HQS)与农民留存(循环使用)种子(FSS)的鲜木薯根产量。在不同农业区的两个地点开展了田间试验:姆库兰加(海岸区)和马鲁库(维多利亚湖区)。将四种HQS来源(原原种、原种、认证种、质量声明种)统称为HQS,与FSS就两个地点各品种的木薯褐色条纹病(CBSD)叶发病率和根发病率、鲜根产量、适销鲜根产量以及可用鲜根产量进行比较。结果表明,FSS中[品种一]和[品种二]的CBSD叶发病率显著高于HQS,但[品种三]并非如此。FSS的CBSD根发病率平均是HQS的六倍。将FSS与特定的认证种子处理(CS)进行比较时,由于CBSD根坏死,FSS有25.8%的根不可用,而CS仅为3.7%。CS的总鲜根产量比FSS高出7.5吨/公顷,增幅为80.6%。种植HQS带来的产量增益在[品种一](+80.7%)、[品种二](+81.3%)和[品种三](+79.5%)中相似,在四个HQS类别中的每一类中也是如此。当还考虑到严重CBSD根坏死造成的损失时,与FSS相比,使用CS带来的总体产量增益为135%。这种增产带来的平均估计收入增益为2279美元/公顷,是获取认证种子估计成本的许多倍。这些结果凸显了高质量种子体系的价值以及农民种植高质量认证种子而非循环使用现有作物可实现的潜在收益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9a3/11582022/c237e98f064e/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验