• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
De-Escalation of Nodal Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer.临床淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者淋巴结手术的降阶梯治疗
JAMA Surg. 2025 Mar 1;160(3):257-266. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5913.
2
Omission of Axillary Dissection Following Nodal Downstaging With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后淋巴结降期时省略腋窝清扫术。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Jun 1;10(6):793-798. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578.
3
Combined analysis of the MF18-02/MF18-03 NEOSENTITURK studies: ypN-positive disease does not necessitate axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast cancer with a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as long as radiotherapy is provided.MF18 - 02/MF18 - 03 NEOSENTITURK研究的联合分析:对于新辅助化疗反应良好的乳腺癌患者,只要进行放疗,ypN阳性疾病并不一定需要腋窝淋巴结清扫。
Cancer. 2025 Jan 1;131(1):e35610. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35610. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
4
Breast Cancer Recurrence in Initially Clinically Node-Positive Patients Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the NEOSENTITURK-Trials MF18-02/18-03.在NEOSENTITURK试验MF18 - 02/18 - 03中,接受新辅助化疗后进行前哨淋巴结活检的初始临床淋巴结阳性患者的乳腺癌复发情况。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):952-966. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16472-6. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
5
Oncologic Safety of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Alone After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.新辅助化疗后单纯前哨淋巴结活检对乳腺癌的肿瘤学安全性
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 May;28(5):2621-2629. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09211-0. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
6
Nodal Recurrence in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-A Rare Event.新辅助化疗后单纯前哨淋巴结活检治疗的淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的淋巴结复发——罕见事件。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;7(12):1851-1855. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4394.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of Radioactive Iodine Seed Placement in the Axilla With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer.新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检中腋窝放射性碘种子埋置对阳性淋巴结乳腺癌的诊断准确性。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Nov 1;157(11):991-999. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3907.
8
Oncologic Outcomes for Different Axillary Staging Techniques in Patients with Nodal-Positive Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systematic Treatment: A Cancer Registry Study.接受新辅助系统治疗的淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者不同腋窝分期技术的肿瘤学结局:一项癌症登记研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;31(7):4381-4392. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15292-y. Epub 2024 May 6.
9
Risk of Surgical Overtreatment in cN1 Breast Cancer Patients who Become ypN0 After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: SLNB Versus TAD.新辅助化疗后变为ypN0的cN1乳腺癌患者手术过度治疗的风险:前哨淋巴结活检与腋窝前哨解剖术对比
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2023-2028. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16625-7. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
10
Targeted axillary dissection reduces residual nodal disease in clinically node- positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后临床淋巴结阳性乳腺癌行靶向腋窝清扫术可减少残留淋巴结疾病。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul 6;22(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03413-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the Clipped Node Enough? Successful Retrieval and False Negative Rate of the Clipped Node After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.切除的淋巴结足够吗?新辅助化疗后切除淋巴结的成功检出率及假阴性率
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18027-9.
2
Axillary Surgical Management in Breast Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Delphi Study.新辅助全身治疗后乳腺癌患者的腋窝手术管理:一项德尔菲研究
Breast Care (Basel). 2025 May 10:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000546267.
3
Changing practice patterns in axillary management for patients with node-positive breast cancer towards increased use of sentinel lymph node biopsy-alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of a survey (MF17-01) among Turkish surgeons.新辅助化疗后,针对淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的腋窝处理模式发生变化,更多地采用仅前哨淋巴结活检:一项针对土耳其外科医生的调查(MF17 - 01)结果
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jun 16;410(1):196. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03767-9.
4
An Overview of the Importance of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer Patients: From the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society of Breast Surgeons.外科肿瘤学会和美国乳腺外科医师学会关于新辅助全身治疗对乳腺癌患者重要性的概述
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17405-7.
5
Construction of a Nomogram Model for Predicting Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Based on the Pan-Immune Inflammation Value.基于泛免疫炎症值构建预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗病理完全缓解的列线图模型
Curr Oncol. 2025 Mar 27;32(4):194. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32040194.

本文引用的文献

1
Omission of Axillary Dissection Following Nodal Downstaging With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后淋巴结降期时省略腋窝清扫术。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Jun 1;10(6):793-798. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578.
2
The use of blue dye alone for sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with initially node-positive breast cancer.在初始淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后,单独使用蓝色染料进行前哨淋巴结活检。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;50(3):107967. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.107967. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
Safety of Targeted Axillary Dissection After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer.新辅助治疗后腋窝淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者行靶向腋窝清扫术的安全性。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Aug 1;158(8):807-815. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1772.
4
SPECT/CT Lymphoscintigraphy Accurately Localizes Clipped and Sentinel Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer.SPECT/CT 淋巴闪烁显像术可准确定位新辅助化疗后阳性乳腺癌的夹闭和前哨淋巴结。
Clin Nucl Med. 2023 Jul 1;48(7):594-599. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004669. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
Radiotherapy or Surgery of the Axilla After a Positive Sentinel Node in Breast Cancer: 10-Year Results of the Randomized Controlled EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结阳性后腋窝放疗或手术:EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS 试验的 10 年随机对照结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 20;41(12):2159-2165. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01565. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
6
Axillary lymph node dissection can be omitted in patients with limited clinically node-positive breast cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis.在临床淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者中,可以省略腋窝淋巴结清扫术:一项国家癌症数据库分析。
Br J Surg. 2022 Nov 22;109(12):1293-1299. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac305.
7
Is Nodal Clipping Beneficial for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?新辅助化疗的阳性淋巴结乳腺癌患者施行淋巴结夹闭术有益吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(10):6133-6139. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12240-6. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
8
SPECT/CT Lymphoscintigraphy Guidance Simplifies and Improves Targeted Axillary Dissection of the Clipped Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Initially Node-Positive Breast Cancer.SPECT/CT 淋巴闪烁显像引导下新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检阳性乳腺癌的靶向腋窝清扫术
Clin Nucl Med. 2022 Nov 1;47(11):e682-e688. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004340. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
9
Three-year follow-up of de-escalated axillary treatment after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in clinically node-positive breast cancer: the MARI-protocol.新辅助全身治疗后临床淋巴结阳性乳腺癌降阶梯腋窝处理的 3 年随访:MARI 方案。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 May;193(1):37-48. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06545-z. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
10
How Often Does Retrieval of a Clipped Lymph Node Change Adjuvant Therapy Recommendations? A Prospective, Consecutive, Patient Cohort Study.夹闭淋巴结的检出频率会改变辅助治疗建议吗?一项前瞻性、连续、患者队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;29(6):3764-3771. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11324-7. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

临床淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者淋巴结手术的降阶梯治疗

De-Escalation of Nodal Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

作者信息

Cabioglu Neslihan, Koçer Havva Belma, Karanlik Hasan, Gülçelik Mehmet Ali, Igci Abdullah, Müslümanoglu Mahmut, Uras Cihan, Mantoglu Baris, Trabulus Didem Can, Akgül Giray, Tükenmez Mustafa, Senol Kazim, Özkurt Enver, Sen Ebru, Karadeniz Çakmak Güldeniz, Bademler Süleyman, Emiroglu Selman, Yildirim Nilüfer, Kara Halil, Dag Ahmet, Dilege Ece, Altinok Ayse, Basaran Gül, Varol Ecenur, Ugurlu Ümit, Bölükbasi Yasemin, Ersoy Yeliz Emine, Zengel Baha, Karaman Niyazi, Özbas Serdar, Zer Leyla, Gül Kiliç Halime, Agcaoglu Orhan, Sakman Gürhan, Utkan Zafer, Soyder Aykut, Akcan Alper, Ergün Sefa, Yilmaz Ravza, Aydiner Adnan, Soran Atilla, Ibis Kamuran, Özmen Vahit

机构信息

Breast Unit, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Department of General Surgery, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Türkiye.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2025 Mar 1;160(3):257-266. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5913.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5913
PMID:39745737
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11904723/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Increasing evidence supports the oncologic safety of de-escalating axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the oncologic outcomes of de-escalating axillary surgery among patients with clinically node (cN)-positive breast cancer and patients whose disease became cN negative after NAC (ycN negative).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In the NEOSENTITURK MF-1803 prospective cohort registry trial, patients from 37 centers with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD) alone or with ypN-negative or ypN-positive disease after NAC were recruited between February 15, 2019, and January 1, 2023, and evaluated.

EXPOSURE

Treatment with SLNB or TAD after NAC.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary aim of the study was axillary, locoregional, or distant recurrence rates; disease-free survival; and disease-specific survival. Number of axillary lymph nodes removed was also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 976 patients (median age, 46 years [range, 21-80 years]) with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease underwent SLNB (n = 620) or TAD alone (n = 356). Most of the cohort had a mapping procedure with blue dye alone (645 [66.1%]) with (n = 177) or without (n = 468) TAD. Overall, no difference was found between patients treated with TAD and patients treated with SLNB in the median number of total lymph nodes removed (TAD, 4 [3-6] vs SLNB, 4 [3-6]; P = .09). Among patients with ypN-positive disease, those who underwent TAD were more likely to have a lower median lymph node ratio (TAD, 0.28 [IQR, 0.20-0.40] vs SLNB, 0.33 [IQR, 0.20-0.50]; P = .03). At a median follow-up of 39 months (IQR, 29-48 months), no significant difference was found in the rates of ipsilateral axillary recurrence (0.3% [1 of 356] vs 0.3% [2 of 620]; P ≥ .99) or locoregional recurrence (0.6% [2 of 356] vs 1.1% [7 of 620]; P = .50) between the TAD and SLNB groups, with an overall locoregional recurrence rate of 0.9% (9 of 976). The initial clinical tumor stage, pathologic complete response, and use of blue dye alone as a mapping procedure were not associated with the outcome. Even though patients with TAD demonstrated an increased disease-free survival rate compared with the SLNB group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (94.9% vs 92.6%; P = .07). Factors associated with decreased 5-year disease-specific survival were cN2-3 axillary stage (cN1, 98.7% vs cN2-3, 96.8%; P = .03) and nonluminal type tumor pathologic characteristics (luminal, 98.9% vs nonluminal, 96.9%; P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The short-term results suggest very low rates of axillary and locoregional recurrence in a select group of patients with cN-negative disease after NAC treated with TAD alone or SLNB alone followed by regional nodal irradiation regardless of the SLNB technique or nodal pathology. Whether TAD might provide a clear survival advantage compared with SLNB remains to be proven in studies with longer follow-up.

摘要

重要性

越来越多的证据支持新辅助化疗(NAC)后对乳腺癌患者进行腋窝手术降阶梯治疗的肿瘤学安全性。

目的

评估临床淋巴结(cN)阳性乳腺癌患者以及NAC后疾病变为cN阴性(ycN阴性)的患者进行腋窝手术降阶梯治疗的肿瘤学结局。

设计、设置和参与者:在NEOSENTITURK MF - 1803前瞻性队列登记试验中,招募了来自37个中心的cT1 - 4N1 - 3M0疾病患者,这些患者在2019年2月15日至2023年1月1日期间接受了前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)或单独的靶向腋窝清扫术(TAD),或NAC后出现ypN阴性或ypN阳性疾病,并进行了评估。

暴露

NAC后接受SLNB或TAD治疗。

主要结局和测量指标

该研究的主要目的是腋窝、局部区域或远处复发率;无病生存期;以及疾病特异性生存期。还评估了切除的腋窝淋巴结数量。

结果

共有976例(中位年龄46岁[范围21 - 80岁])cT1 - 4N1 - 3M0疾病患者接受了SLNB(n = 620)或单独的TAD(n = 356)。队列中的大多数患者仅采用蓝色染料进行定位操作(645例[66.1%]),其中有(n = 177)或没有(n = 468)TAD。总体而言,接受TAD治疗的患者与接受SLNB治疗的患者在切除的总淋巴结中位数上没有差异(TAD,4[3 - 6] vs SLNB,4[3 - 6];P = 0.09)。在ypN阳性疾病患者中,接受TAD的患者更有可能具有较低的中位淋巴结比率(TAD,0.28[四分位间距,0.20 - 0.40] vs SLNB,0.33[四分位间距,0.20 - 0.50];P = 0.03)。在中位随访39个月(四分位间距,29 - 48个月)时,TAD组和SLNB组在同侧腋窝复发率(0.3%[356例中的1例] vs 0.3%[620例中的2例];P≥0.99)或局部区域复发率(0.6%[356例中的2例] vs 1.1%[620例中的7例];P = 0.50)方面没有显著差异,总体局部区域复发率为0.9%(976例中的9例)。初始临床肿瘤分期、病理完全缓解以及仅使用蓝色染料作为定位操作与结局无关。尽管与SLNB组相比,接受TAD的患者无病生存率有所提高,但这种差异未达到统计学意义(94.9% vs 92.6%;P = 0.07)。与5年疾病特异性生存率降低相关的因素是cN2 - 3腋窝分期(cN1,98.7% vs cN2 - 3,96.8%;P = 0.03)和非腔面型肿瘤病理特征(腔面型,98.9% vs 非腔面型,96.9%;P = 0.007)。

结论和相关性

短期结果表明,在一组经NAC后cN阴性疾病的选定患者中,无论SLNB技术或淋巴结病理如何,单独接受TAD或SLNB治疗后再进行区域淋巴结照射,腋窝和局部区域复发率非常低。与SLNB相比,TAD是否能提供明显的生存优势仍有待在更长随访期的研究中得到证实。