• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向对参与式设计的批判性后人类主义视角。

Towards a critical posthumanist perspective on participatory design.

作者信息

Prescott Tony, Robillard Julie M, Murray Stuart

机构信息

Computer Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia and BC Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Med Humanit. 2025 Jan 2;50(4):715-716. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2024-013078.

DOI:10.1136/medhum-2024-013078
PMID:39746715
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11877099/
Abstract

Participatory design places a strong emphasis on human agency, user perspectives and democratic ideals of inclusivity and empowerment, and is therefore often associated with humanist principles and values. In contrast, critical posthumanism questions key humanist assumptions about the centred and singular nature of the 'human condition'. Instead, posthumanism points to the evolving and diverse lived experiences of people and how these are transformed by (and are transforming of) culture, environment and technology. In this commentary, we explore how participatory design could benefit from a posthumanist perspective that more explicitly acknowledges the entangled and interconnected nature of our technologised lives.

摘要

参与式设计非常强调人的能动性、用户视角以及包容性和赋权的民主理想,因此常常与人文主义原则和价值观相关联。相比之下,批判性后人文主义对关于“人类状况”的中心化和单一性质的关键人文主义假设提出质疑。相反,后人文主义指出人们不断演变且多样的生活经历,以及这些经历如何被文化、环境和技术所改变(并正在改变着文化、环境和技术)。在这篇评论中,我们探讨参与式设计如何能够从后人文主义视角中受益,该视角更明确地承认我们技术化生活的相互交织和相互关联的本质。

相似文献

1
Towards a critical posthumanist perspective on participatory design.迈向对参与式设计的批判性后人类主义视角。
Med Humanit. 2025 Jan 2;50(4):715-716. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2024-013078.
2
Instrumentalising the imagination: science fiction prototyping as posthumanist methodology.
Med Humanit. 2025 Jan 2;50(4):717-719. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2024-013057.
3
Disability, digital technologies and the ambivalent allure of posthumanist/transhumanist futures.
Med Humanit. 2025 Jan 2;50(4):685-693. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2024-013020.
4
Storying the world: a posthumanist critique of phenomenological-humanist representational practices in mental health nurse qualitative inquiry.讲述世界:对心理健康护理质性研究中现象学-人文主义表征实践的后人类主义批判
Nurs Philos. 2016 Oct;17(4):290-7. doi: 10.1111/nup.12135. Epub 2016 Jun 12.
5
Exploring cultural imaginaries of robots with children with brittle bone disease: a participatory design study.探索脆骨病患儿对机器人的文化想象:一项参与式设计研究。
Med Humanit. 2025 Jan 2;50(4):705-714. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2024-013039.
6
What does person-centred care mean, if you weren't considered a person anyway: An engagement with person-centred care and Black, queer, feminist, and posthuman approaches.如果连人都不被当作人看待,那么以人为本的护理意味着什么:参与以人为本的护理以及黑人、酷儿、女权主义和后人类的方法。
Nurs Philos. 2022 Jul;23(3):e12401. doi: 10.1111/nup.12401. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
7
Toward an ontology of the mutant in the health sciences: Re/defining the person from Cronenberg's perspective.迈向健康科学中突变体的本体论:从科伦拜恩的视角重新定义人。
Nurs Inq. 2024 Jan;31(1):e12599. doi: 10.1111/nin.12599. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
8
Notes on [post]human nursing: What It MIGHT Be, What it is Not.关于 [后]人类护理:它可能是什么,它不是什么。
Nurs Inq. 2024 Jan;31(1):e12562. doi: 10.1111/nin.12562. Epub 2023 May 21.
9
Farewell to humanism? Considerations for nursing philosophy and research in posthuman times.告别人文主义?后人类时代护理哲学与研究的思考。
Nurs Philos. 2023 Jun 15:e12448. doi: 10.1111/nup.12448.
10
Medical Humanism in the Posthuman Era: A Critical Examination of its Past, Present, and Future.后人类时代的医学人文主义:对其过去、现在和未来的批判性审视。
Uisahak. 2023 Apr;32(1):115-145. doi: 10.13081/kjmh.2023.32.115.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring cultural imaginaries of robots with children with brittle bone disease: a participatory design study.探索脆骨病患儿对机器人的文化想象:一项参与式设计研究。
Med Humanit. 2025 Jan 2;50(4):705-714. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2024-013039.
2
Are friends electric? The benefits and risks of human-robot relationships.朋友是带电的吗?人机关系的益处与风险。
iScience. 2020 Dec 26;24(1):101993. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101993. eCollection 2021 Jan 22.
3
Anthropomorphism in Human-Robot Co-evolution.人机协同进化中的拟人化
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 26;9:468. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00468. eCollection 2018.