Yelin E H, Henke C J, Kramer J S, Nevitt M C, Shearn M, Epstein W V
N Engl J Med. 1985 Apr 11;312(15):962-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198504113121506.
This study compares the use of health care services (hospital and ambulatory) by patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were under the care of rheumatologists in prepaid and fee-for-service arrangements. Participating physicians from a random sample of half the rheumatologists in northern California maintained a log of all their patients with well-established diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis. We interviewed 822 of their patients, using a structured, validated phone survey to obtain information about health care use. Patients in prepaid plans had about the same number and type of hospitalizations and the same rate of surgery as those receiving fee-for-service care. However, fee-for-service patients made more ambulatory visits. We conclude that the use of expensive services (hospital admissions and surgery) for the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis is not different in fee-for-service and prepaid settings.
本研究比较了类风湿性关节炎患者在预付制和按服务收费制安排下,由风湿病专家诊治时使用医疗服务(住院和门诊)的情况。从北加利福尼亚州一半的风湿病专家中随机抽取的参与研究的医生,记录了他们所有确诊为类风湿性关节炎的患者情况。我们对其中822名患者进行了访谈,采用结构化、经过验证的电话调查来获取有关医疗服务使用的信息。参加预付制计划的患者的住院次数和类型以及手术率与接受按服务收费治疗的患者大致相同。然而,按服务收费的患者门诊就诊次数更多。我们得出结论,在按服务收费和预付制环境中,用于治疗类风湿性关节炎患者的昂贵服务(住院和手术)的使用情况并无差异。