• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症发病率评估中参考组选择的重要性。

Importance of reference group selection in the evaluation of cancer incidence.

作者信息

Mueller Alexandra K, Vaeth Brandon, Todd Andrew C, Dasaro Christopher R, Li Jiehui, Qiao Baozhen, Boffetta Paolo, Prezant David J, Hall Charles B, Goldfarb David G, Zeig-Owens Rachel

机构信息

Bureau of Health Services, World Trade Center Health Program, Fire Department of the City of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):270. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82555-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-82555-9
PMID:39747157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11696304/
Abstract

Elevated cancer incidence has been reported among World Trade Center (WTC)-exposed responders, with some incidence rate ratios (IRRs) varying over time. This study describes the influence that different reference populations have on relative cancer incidence and temporal trends. Participants from the WTC Combined Rescue/Recovery Cohort (n = 65,691) were observed between 1/1/2002 and 12/31/2015 using data obtained from 13 state cancer registries. Poisson regression was used to estimate IRRs controlling for age, race/ethnicity, and calendar year. IRRs and change-points were estimated using three reference populations (New York City (NYC), New York State (NYS), and a US population). IRRs for each cancer site varied in magnitude. Prostate and thyroid cancer IRRs were significantly greater in WTC-exposed responders, while colon and lung cancer IRRs were significantly lower compared with NYC, NYS, and US population reference groups. The range of IRRs varied by reference population. Mixed findings were observed for other cancers, as results were dependent on the reference group used. A significant change-point was found only for prostate cancer, and only when compared to a US population. Our findings suggest that reference population selection will influence the IRR, timing, and statistical significance of change-point estimation, varying with follow-up length.

摘要

据报道,世界贸易中心(WTC)暴露人群中的癌症发病率有所上升,一些发病率比(IRR)随时间变化。本研究描述了不同参考人群对相对癌症发病率和时间趋势的影响。利用从13个州癌症登记处获得的数据,对世界贸易中心联合救援/恢复队列(n = 65,691)的参与者在2002年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间进行了观察。使用泊松回归来估计控制年龄、种族/民族和日历年的IRR。使用三个参考人群(纽约市(NYC)、纽约州(NYS)和美国人群)估计IRR和变化点。每个癌症部位的IRR在幅度上有所不同。与纽约市、纽约州和美国人群参考组相比,WTC暴露人群中前列腺癌和甲状腺癌的IRR显著更高,而结肠癌和肺癌的IRR显著更低。IRR的范围因参考人群而异。对于其他癌症,观察到混合结果,因为结果取决于所使用的参考组。仅在前列腺癌中发现了一个显著的变化点,并且仅在与美国人群进行比较时发现。我们的研究结果表明,参考人群的选择将影响IRR、变化点估计的时间和统计显著性,且随随访时间长度而变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/884a/11696304/23b6fdaaf821/41598_2024_82555_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/884a/11696304/5975d9541faa/41598_2024_82555_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/884a/11696304/23b6fdaaf821/41598_2024_82555_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/884a/11696304/5975d9541faa/41598_2024_82555_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/884a/11696304/23b6fdaaf821/41598_2024_82555_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Importance of reference group selection in the evaluation of cancer incidence.癌症发病率评估中参考组选择的重要性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):270. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82555-9.
2
Estimation of Future Cancer Burden Among Rescue and Recovery Workers Exposed to the World Trade Center Disaster.暴露于“世界贸易中心灾难”中的救援和恢复工作人员未来癌症负担的估计。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;4(6):828-831. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0504.
3
Impact of healthcare services on thyroid cancer incidence among World Trade Center-exposed rescue and recovery workers.世贸中心暴露的救援和恢复工作人员中医疗保健服务对甲状腺癌发病率的影响。
Am J Ind Med. 2021 Oct;64(10):861-872. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23277. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
4
Temporal association of prostate cancer incidence with World Trade Center rescue/recovery work.与世界贸易中心救援/恢复工作相关的前列腺癌发病的时间关联。
Occup Environ Med. 2021 Oct;78(10):699-706. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107405. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
5
Association between World Trade Center exposure and excess cancer risk.世贸中心暴露与癌症风险增加之间的关联。
JAMA. 2012 Dec 19;308(23):2479-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.110980.
6
World Trade Center Health Program - United States, 2012-2020.世界贸易中心健康计划-美国,2012-2020 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 Sep 10;70(4):1-21. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7004a1.
7
Cancer incidence in World Trade Center-exposed and non-exposed male firefighters, as compared with the US adult male population: 2001-2016.2001-2016 年,世贸中心暴露和未暴露男性消防员与美国成年男性人口的癌症发病率比较。
Occup Environ Med. 2021 Oct;78(10):707-714. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107570. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
8
Cancer incidence in World Trade Center rescue and recovery workers by race and ethnicity.按种族和民族划分的世界贸易中心救援和恢复工作人员的癌症发病率。
Am J Ind Med. 2023 Dec;66(12):1048-1055. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23539. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
9
Cancer survival among World Trade Center rescue and recovery workers: A collaborative cohort study.世界贸易中心救援和恢复工作人员的癌症生存情况:一项协作队列研究。
Am J Ind Med. 2021 Oct;64(10):815-826. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23278. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
10
Early assessment of cancer outcomes in New York City firefighters after the 9/11 attacks: an observational cohort study.9·11 袭击事件后纽约市消防员癌症结局的早期评估:一项观察性队列研究。
Lancet. 2011 Sep 3;378(9794):898-905. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60989-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical Activity and Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Current Evidence and Biological Mechanisms.体力活动与癌症发病率和死亡率:当前证据及生物学机制
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;17(9):1410. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091410.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal Aspects of the Association between Exposure to the World Trade Center Disaster and Risk of Cutaneous Melanoma.接触世贸中心灾难与皮肤黑色素瘤风险之间关联的时间因素
JID Innov. 2021 Oct 13;2(1):100063. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100063. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Temporal association of prostate cancer incidence with World Trade Center rescue/recovery work.与世界贸易中心救援/恢复工作相关的前列腺癌发病的时间关联。
Occup Environ Med. 2021 Oct;78(10):699-706. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107405. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
3
Cancer Incidence in World Trade Center Rescue and Recovery Workers: 14 Years of Follow-Up.
世界贸易中心救援和恢复工作人员的癌症发病率:14 年的随访结果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Feb 7;114(2):210-219. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab165.
4
Impact of healthcare services on thyroid cancer incidence among World Trade Center-exposed rescue and recovery workers.世贸中心暴露的救援和恢复工作人员中医疗保健服务对甲状腺癌发病率的影响。
Am J Ind Med. 2021 Oct;64(10):861-872. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23277. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
5
Combining Three Cohorts of World Trade Center Rescue/Recovery Workers for Assessing Cancer Incidence and Mortality.将三批世界贸易中心救援/恢复工作人员合并,以评估癌症发病率和死亡率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1386. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041386.
6
Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Firefighters: A State-of-the-Art Review and Meta-َAnalysis.消防员的癌症发病率和死亡率:最新综述与荟萃分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Nov 1;20(11):3221-3231. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3221.
7
Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates.近期全球前列腺癌发病率和死亡率模式。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
8
Selection of reference groups in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors.在原子弹幸存者寿命研究中参考组的选择。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;32(12):1055-1063. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0337-9. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
9
Rural-Urban Differences in Cancer Incidence and Trends in the United States.城乡癌症发病率差异及美国的发病趋势。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Nov;27(11):1265-1274. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0430. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
10
Impact of skin cancer screening and secondary prevention campaigns on skin cancer incidence and mortality: A systematic review.皮肤癌筛查和二级预防活动对皮肤癌发病率和死亡率的影响:系统评价。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jan;76(1):129-139.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.07.045. Epub 2016 Oct 1.