Suppr超能文献

R/英国医生(实际中的抽样偏差):英国初级医生薪酬公投结果与英国医生Reddit上预测结果的对比

R/DoctorsUK (Sampling Bias in Action): How English Junior Doctors Pay Referendum Results Compared to Those Predicted on the Doctors UK Reddit.

作者信息

Blenkinsop Lewis

机构信息

Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jan 1;17(1):e76714. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76714. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Reddit is a popular social media platform that is made up of subreddits, a kind of special interest page. One of these is DoctorsUK, which has over 45,000 members and claims to be a community for UK-based doctors. There is, however, no way of verifying who uses the page, as Reddit is essentially anonymous. Following a period of industrial action in England, a pay deal was put forward and voted on by over 45,000 resident doctors in England. During the voting window, many posts on the subreddit DoctorsUK referenced the pay deal with various comments stating that members were either voting for or against the deal. I wanted to compare the numbers who stated their views on the page to the results obtained in the official ballot. I analyzed the four most commented - on posts relating to the pay deal and read a total of 1,297 comments on these posts. Only a user's first comment on a post was included in the analysis, and deleted comments were not retrieved. This left me with 548 comments to include in the study. I then grouped the comments based on whether they clearly stated their voting intention on the ballot. The voting intention was clearly stated in 230 comments. Of these 230 comments, 60 comments (26.1%) said they would be accepting the deal, and 170 (73.9%) said they would be rejecting it. In the formal ballot, 66% of resident doctors voted to accept the deal. A sentiment analysis was also performed, which found an overwhelming negative sentiment in three of the four posts. A chi-squared test found a P-value of <0.001, suggesting a significant difference between predicted and actual values. While this paper looked at a single question, it found a significant amount of bias in the subreddit. There are few surveys of doctors at such volume that other issues could be assessed in this way. This study should lead to a questioning of the veracity of views on a page that is anonymous and a realisation that we can, not in good faith, assume that all posters on DoctorsUK are UK-based doctors. With this in mind, we may need to question the possible alternative motives for the propagation of such ideas. It is also worth considering how these ideas being shared in a public forum associated with the medical profession may affect large language models and AI, given that Reddit has allowed AI companies access to its data.

摘要

Reddit是一个受欢迎的社交媒体平台,由子版块组成,子版块是一种具有特定兴趣的页面。其中一个子版块是“英国医生”(DoctorsUK),它拥有超过45000名成员,自称是一个面向英国医生的社区。然而,由于Reddit本质上是匿名的,无法核实谁在使用该页面。在英格兰经历了一段时间的罢工行动后,提出了一项薪酬协议,并由英格兰超过45000名住院医生进行投票。在投票窗口期间,“英国医生”子版块上的许多帖子都提到了薪酬协议,各种评论表明成员们要么投票赞成要么反对该协议。我想将在该页面上表明观点的人数与官方投票结果进行比较。我分析了与薪酬协议相关的四条评论最多的帖子,总共阅读了这些帖子上的1297条评论。分析中只包括用户对一篇帖子的第一条评论,已删除的评论未被检索。这样我得到了548条可纳入研究的评论。然后我根据评论是否明确表明其在投票中的意图对评论进行分组。在230条评论中明确表明了投票意图。在这230条评论中,60条评论(26.1%)表示他们会接受该协议,170条评论(73.9%)表示他们会拒绝该协议。在正式投票中,66%的住院医生投票接受该协议。还进行了情感分析,结果发现在四条帖子中的三条中存在压倒性的负面情绪。卡方检验发现P值<0.001,表明预测值与实际值之间存在显著差异。虽然本文只研究了一个问题,但发现该子版块存在大量偏差。很少有针对医生的如此大规模的调查,以至于可以用这种方式评估其他问题。这项研究应该引发人们对一个匿名页面上观点真实性的质疑,并意识到我们不能真诚地假设“英国医生”子版块上的所有发帖者都是英国医生。考虑到这一点,我们可能需要质疑传播此类观点的可能的其他动机。鉴于Reddit已允许人工智能公司访问其数据,还值得考虑在与医疗行业相关的公共论坛上分享的这些观点可能如何影响大型语言模型和人工智能。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验