• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索 r/birthcontrol 帖子中使用的语言:使用 Reddit 帖子数据和自然语言处理推进避孕研究的案例研究。

Exploring Language Used in Posts on r/birthcontrol: Case Study Using Data From Reddit Posts and Natural Language Processing to Advance Contraception Research.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States.

School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 30;25:e46342. doi: 10.2196/46342.

DOI:10.2196/46342
PMID:37389907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10365572/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contraceptive choice is central to reproductive autonomy. The internet, including social networking sites like Reddit, is an important resource for people seeking contraceptive information and support. A subreddit dedicated to contraception, r/birthcontrol, provides a platform for people to post about contraception.

OBJECTIVE

This study explored the use of r/birthcontrol, from the inception of the subreddit through the end of 2020. We describe the web-based community, identify distinctive interests and themes based upon the textual content of posts, and explore the content of posts with the most user engagement (ie, "popular" posts).

METHODS

Data were obtained from the PushShift Reddit application programming interface from the establishment of r/birthcontrol to the start date of analysis (July 21, 2011, to December 31, 2020). User interactions within the subreddit were analyzed to describe community use over time, specifically the commonality of use based on the volume of posts, the length of posts (character count), and the proportion of posts with any and each flair applied. "Popular" posts on r/birthcontrol were determined based on the number of comments and "scores," or upvotes minus downvotes; popular posts had 9 comments and a score of ≥3. Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) analyses were run on all posts with flairs applied, posts within each flair group, and popular posts within each flair group to characterize and compare the distinctive language used in each group.

RESULTS

There were 105,485 posts to r/birthcontrol during the study period, with the volume of posts increasing over time. Within the time frame for which flairs were available on r/birthcontrol (after February 4, 2016), users applied flairs to 78% (n=73,426) of posts. Most posts contained exclusively textual content (n=66,071, 96%), had comments (n=59,189, 86%), and had a score (n=66,071, 96%). Posts averaged 731 characters in length (median 555). "SideEffects!?" was the most frequently used flair overall (n=27,530, 40%), while "Experience" (n=719, 31%) and "SideEffects!?" (n=672, 29%) were most common among popular posts. TF-IDF analyses of all posts showed interest in contraceptive methods, menstrual experiences, timing, feelings, and unprotected sex. While TF-IDF results for posts with each flair varied, the contraceptive pill, menstrual experiences, and timing were discussed across flair groups. Among popular posts, intrauterine devices and contraceptive use experiences were often discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

People commonly wrote about contraceptive side effects and experiences using methods, highlighting the value of r/birthcontrol as a space to post about aspects of contraceptive use that are not well addressed by clinical contraceptive counseling. The value of real-time, open-access data on contraceptive users' interests is especially high given the shifting landscape of and increasing constraints on reproductive health care in the United States.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d971/10365572/7ded317c2585/jmir_v25i1e46342_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d971/10365572/0d4796fda9b5/jmir_v25i1e46342_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d971/10365572/7ded317c2585/jmir_v25i1e46342_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d971/10365572/0d4796fda9b5/jmir_v25i1e46342_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d971/10365572/7ded317c2585/jmir_v25i1e46342_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

避孕选择是生殖自主权的核心。互联网,包括像 Reddit 这样的社交网站,是人们寻找避孕信息和支持的重要资源。一个专门讨论避孕的 Reddit 子版块 r/birthcontrol 为人们提供了一个发布避孕信息的平台。

目的

本研究探索了 r/birthcontrol 的使用情况,从子版块成立到 2020 年底。我们描述了这个基于网络的社区,根据帖子的文本内容确定了独特的兴趣和主题,并探讨了用户参与度最高的帖子(即“热门”帖子)的内容。

方法

数据是从 PushShift Reddit 应用程序接口中获取的,时间范围从 r/birthcontrol 的建立到分析开始日期(2011 年 7 月 21 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日)。通过分析子版块内的用户互动,我们描述了社区随时间的使用情况,具体来说是基于帖子数量、帖子长度(字符数)以及带有任何和每种标记的帖子比例的共同使用情况。r/birthcontrol 上的“热门”帖子是根据评论数量和“分数”(即点赞数减去点赞数)来确定的;热门帖子有 9 条评论和≥3 的分数。对所有带有标记的帖子、每个标记组内的帖子以及每个标记组内的热门帖子进行了术语频率-逆文档频率(TF-IDF)分析,以描述和比较每个组中使用的独特语言。

结果

在研究期间,r/birthcontrol 上共有 105485 个帖子,帖子数量随时间增加。在 r/birthcontrol 上可用标记的时间范围内(2016 年 2 月 4 日之后),用户在 78%(n=73426)的帖子上应用了标记。大多数帖子仅包含文本内容(n=66071,96%),有评论(n=59189,86%),并且有分数(n=66071,96%)。帖子平均长度为 731 个字符(中位数 555 个字符)。“SideEffects!?”是总体上使用最频繁的标记(n=27530,40%),而“Experience”(n=719,31%)和“SideEffects!?”(n=672,29%)在热门帖子中最常见。所有帖子的 TF-IDF 分析都显示了对避孕方法、月经经历、时间、感觉和无保护性行为的兴趣。虽然每个标记的帖子的 TF-IDF 分析结果有所不同,但避孕药、月经经历和时间在标记组中都有讨论。在热门帖子中,宫内节育器和避孕使用经验经常被讨论。

结论

人们经常会写到避孕的副作用和使用方法的体验,这突出了 r/birthcontrol 作为一个发布避孕使用方面内容的空间的价值,这些内容在临床避孕咨询中没有得到很好的涵盖。鉴于美国生殖健康护理的格局不断变化和日益受到限制,实时、开放获取的避孕用户兴趣数据的价值尤其高。

相似文献

1
Exploring Language Used in Posts on r/birthcontrol: Case Study Using Data From Reddit Posts and Natural Language Processing to Advance Contraception Research.探索 r/birthcontrol 帖子中使用的语言:使用 Reddit 帖子数据和自然语言处理推进避孕研究的案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 30;25:e46342. doi: 10.2196/46342.
2
Perception and use of reversible contraceptive methods in Germany: A social listening analysis.德国对可逆避孕方法的认知和使用:一项社会聆听分析。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057221147390. doi: 10.1177/17455057221147390.
3
Examining the Popularity, Content, and Intersections With the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's Definition of Recovery in a Nonclinical Online Cannabis Cessation Community: Infodemiology Study of Reddit Posts.考察非临床在线大麻戒断社区中关于恢复的普及程度、内容以及与物质滥用和心理健康服务管理局定义的交叉:Reddit 帖子的信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 27;26:e47357. doi: 10.2196/47357.
4
Understanding Mental Health Issues in Different Subdomains of Social Networking Services: Computational Analysis of Text-Based Reddit Posts.理解不同社交网络服务领域的心理健康问题:基于文本的 Reddit 帖子的计算分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 30;25:e49074. doi: 10.2196/49074.
5
A Content Analysis of Reddit Users' Posts about Challenges to Contraceptive care-seeking during COVID-19-related Restrictions in the United States.关于美国新冠疫情相关限制期间寻求避孕护理面临挑战的Reddit用户帖子内容分析
J Health Commun. 2022 Oct 3;27(10):746-754. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2157911. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
6
Analyzing Reddit Forums Specific to Abortion That Yield Diverse Dialogues Pertaining to Medical Information Seeking and Personal Worldviews: Data Mining and Natural Language Processing Comparative Study.分析特定于堕胎的 Reddit 论坛,以挖掘和自然语言处理比较研究涉及医学信息寻求和个人世界观的多样化对话。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 14;26:e47408. doi: 10.2196/47408.
7
Thematic Analysis of Reddit Content About Buprenorphine-naloxone Using Manual Annotation and Natural Language Processing Techniques.使用人工标注和自然语言处理技术对Reddit上有关丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮内容的主题分析
J Addict Med. 2022;16(4):454-460. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000940. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
8
Determining the prevalence of cannabis, tobacco, and vaping device mentions in online communities using natural language processing.使用自然语言处理技术确定在线社区中关于大麻、烟草和蒸气设备的提及率。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Nov 1;228:109016. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109016. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
Online community queries on hormonal male contraception: An analysis of the Reddit "Ask Me Anything" experience.在线社区对男性荷尔蒙避孕的咨询:对 Reddit“问我任何事”经验的分析。
Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
10
Analyzing User Reviews of the First Digital Contraceptive: Mixed Methods Study.分析首款数字避孕药的用户评价:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 14;25:e47131. doi: 10.2196/47131.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Natural Language Processing to Describe the Use of an Online Community for Abortion During 2022: Dynamic Topic Modeling Analysis of Reddit Posts.利用自然语言处理描述2022年一个堕胎在线社区的使用情况:Reddit帖子的动态主题建模分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jul 9;5:e72771. doi: 10.2196/72771.
2
Behavioral Innovations to Access Abortion Post-Dobbs: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Reddit's r/abortion Community in 2022.多布斯案后获取堕胎服务的行为创新:对2022年Reddit上r/堕胎社区的定性主题分析
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251351192. doi: 10.1177/00469580251351192. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
3
Have Others Had This Experience? A Qualitative Analysis of Posts on Self-Managed Abortion to US-Based Reddit Community.

本文引用的文献

1
Misconceptions, Misinformation, and Misperceptions: A Case for Removing the "Mis-" When Discussing Contraceptive Beliefs.误解、错误信息和错觉:在讨论避孕信念时去掉“误”字的理由。
Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Mar;54(1):309-321. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12232. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
A Content Analysis of Reddit Users' Posts about Challenges to Contraceptive care-seeking during COVID-19-related Restrictions in the United States.关于美国新冠疫情相关限制期间寻求避孕护理面临挑战的Reddit用户帖子内容分析
J Health Commun. 2022 Oct 3;27(10):746-754. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2157911. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
3
TikTok, #IUD, and User Experience With Intrauterine Devices Reported on Social Media.
其他人有过这种经历吗?对美国Reddit社区关于自我管理堕胎帖子的定性分析。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jun;57(2):175-184. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70011. Epub 2025 May 30.
4
Insights on the Side Effects of Female Contraceptive Products From Online Drug Reviews: Natural Language Processing-Based Content Analysis.从在线药品评论看女性避孕产品的副作用:基于自然语言处理的内容分析
JMIR AI. 2025 Apr 3;4:e68809. doi: 10.2196/68809.
TikTok、IUD 和社交媒体上报的宫内节育器用户体验
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan 1;141(1):215-217. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005027. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
4
Factors influencing contraception choice and use globally: a synthesis of systematic reviews.全球范围内影响避孕方法选择和使用的因素:系统评价综述。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022 Oct;27(5):364-372. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2022.2096215. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
5
Women's experiences with person-centered family planning care: Differences by sociodemographic characteristics.女性以人为主导的计划生育护理体验:社会人口学特征差异
Contracept X. 2022 Jul 25;4:100081. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100081. eCollection 2022.
6
Awareness, knowledge, and misconceptions of adolescents and young people regarding long-acting reversible contraceptives: a systematic review and meta-analysis.青少年和年轻人对长效可逆避孕措施的认知、知识和误解:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Jul;118(1):168-179. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 May 28.
7
"Wish I Would Have Known that before I Started Using It": Contraceptive Messages and Information Seeking among Young Women.“真希望在开始使用之前就知道这些”:年轻女性中的避孕信息与信息寻求情况
Health Commun. 2023 Apr;38(4):834-843. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1980249. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
8
Using Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) to Access Google Data and Gain Insights Into Searches on Birth Control in Louisiana and Mississippi, 2014-2018: Infoveillance Study.利用应用程序编程接口 (API) 获取谷歌数据并深入了解路易斯安那州和密西西比州 2014-2018 年的避孕措施搜索情况:信息监测研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 12;23(7):e25923. doi: 10.2196/25923.
9
Use of contraception among reproductive-aged women in the United States, 2014 and 2016.2014年和2016年美国育龄妇女的避孕措施使用情况。
F S Rep. 2020 Jul 9;1(2):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.06.006. eCollection 2020 Sep.
10
Strengthening contraceptive counselling: gaps in knowledge and implementation research.加强避孕咨询:知识与实施研究中的差距
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Oct;48(4):235-237. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201104. Epub 2021 Apr 30.