A Pressing Emergency in Oncology: A Case Series of Patients With Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome.

BACKGROUND

The defining characteristic of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a reversible, predominantly vasogenic edema of the white matter, particularly affecting the parenchyma supplied by the posterior circulation. PRES is most commonly associated with hypertension. We present a case series of seven normotensive patients diagnosed with cancer who had posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This series of retrospective cases includes seven patients hospitalized between August 2022 and October 2024, all with a primary oncological condition and diagnosed with PRES either at admission or during their hospital stay. PRES was established according to the diagnostic criteria outlined in the 2012 Berlin Study. Our study concentrated on clinical characteristics, including underlying disease, triggering clinical events, chemotherapy agents, and outcome measures such as reversibility, functional status, and mortality.

RESULTS

The median age of patients in this study was 48 years. No patient exhibited significantly elevated blood pressure during their inpatient stay. Altered consciousness with seizures was the primary initial manifestation in most patients, followed by headache. The predominant observation on the MRI was T2 flair hyperintensity in the posterior circulation. All subjects attained nearly full neurological recovery by 28 days, regardless of steroid therapy. The 90-day all-cause mortality rate was 14% (one out of seven patients). There were no fatalities attributable to PRES.

CONCLUSION

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome is a neurological emergency that may evade the discerning attention of the attending physician. Owing to the extensive range of clinical features and MRI findings, the list of differential diagnoses is substantial. The reversibility of symptoms, while not always applicable, is predominantly certain, as demonstrated in our case series. We must extend our focus beyond conventional risk variables such as hypertension to consider additional clinical insults. Delayed diagnosis may lead to worse neurological outcomes.