Hou Zhuoer, Li Xiaoyan, Yang Lili, Liu Ting, Lv Hangpeng, Sun Qiuhua
The College of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
The Affiliated Shaoyifu Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Jan 3;37(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02911-7.
Many studies have developed or validated predictive models to estimate the risk of sarcopenia in dialysis patients, but the quality of model development and the applicability of the models remain unclear.
To systematically review and critically evaluate currently available predictive models for sarcopenia in dialysis patients.
We systematically searched five databases until March 2024. Observational studies that developed or validated predictive models or scoring systems for sarcopenia in dialysis patients were considered eligible. We included studies of adults (≥ 18 years of age) on dialysis and excluded studies that did not validate the predictive model. Data extraction was performed independently by two authors using a standardized data extraction table based on a checklist of key assessments and data extraction for systematic evaluation of predictive modeling research. The quality of the model was assessed using the Predictive Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.
Of the 104,454 studies screened, 13 studies described 13 predictive models. The incidence of sarcopenia in dialysis patients ranged from 6.6 to 34.4%. The most commonly used predictors were age and body mass index. In the derivation set, the reported area under the curve or C-statistic is between 0.81 and 0.95. The area under the curve reported by the external validation set is between 0.78 and 0.93. All studies had a high risk of bias, mainly due to poor reporting in the outcome and the analysis domains, and three studies had a high risk of bias in terms of applicability.
Future research should focus on validating and improving existing predictive models or developing new models using rigorous methods.
许多研究已开发或验证了预测模型,以估计透析患者肌肉减少症的风险,但模型开发的质量和模型的适用性仍不明确。
系统评价并严格评估目前可用的透析患者肌肉减少症预测模型。
我们系统检索了五个数据库直至2024年3月。纳入为透析患者肌肉减少症开发或验证预测模型或评分系统的观察性研究。我们纳入了对成年透析患者(≥18岁)的研究,并排除未对预测模型进行验证的研究。由两名作者独立使用基于关键评估清单和用于预测模型研究系统评价的数据提取清单的标准化数据提取表进行数据提取。使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具评估模型质量。
在筛选的104454项研究中,13项研究描述了13个预测模型。透析患者肌肉减少症的发生率在6.6%至34.4%之间。最常用的预测因素是年龄和体重指数。在推导集中,报告的曲线下面积或C统计量在0.81至0.95之间。外部验证集报告的曲线下面积在0.78至0.93之间。所有研究都有较高的偏倚风险,主要是由于结局和分析领域报告不佳,三项研究在适用性方面有较高的偏倚风险。
未来的研究应专注于使用严格的方法验证和改进现有预测模型或开发新模型。