Schlatter Sophie, Berland Alexandre, Lutz Antoine, Shankland Rebecca, Barret Noémie, Guillaumée Theodore, Duclos Antoine, Cortet Marion, Rimmelé Thomas, Rode Gilles, Lilot Marc
University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Healthcare Simulation Center (Centre Lyonnais d'Enseignement par Simulation en Santé, CLESS), SIMULYON, Lyon, France.
University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Lyon, France.
Med Teach. 2025 Aug;47(8):1367-1376. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2431137. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a stressful exam assessing medical competencies. Stress coping strategies are expected to enhance students' performance during OSCE. The objective was to determine the effect of short preventive coping interventions on performance of medical students.
Double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with multiple arms and a superiority hypothesis. Enrolment was proposed to each fourth-year undergraduate medical student convened to the Lyon Est University OSCE in 2022. There was no exclusion criterion. Students were randomized to one of four groups: standardized breathing with cardiac biofeedback (BFB), mindfulness-based intervention (MBI), positive psychology intervention (PPI), or control (CTRL). Each intervention was video-guided, lasted six minutes, and occurred just before starting the OSCE. The primary outcome was the academic OSCE score, assessed through specific grids by university examiners blinded to the interventions. Secondary outcomes included specific performance scores, and student perception of the influence of the intervention on their performance.
A total of 482 students were included. No difference was found between BFB (-0.17 [95%CI, -1.20 to 0.86], = .749), MBI (0.32 [95%CI, -0.71 to 1.36], = .540), or PPI groups (-0.25 [95%CI, -1.29 to 0.79], = .637) on the academic OSCE score compared to the control group, nor regarding the specific performance scores. Compared to the control group, the students perceived that the intervention influenced more positively their performance (BFB +3 [95%CI, 0-8]), < .001; MBI +4 [95%CI, 1-9], = .040; PPI +1 [95%CI, 0-4], = .040]).
A single six-minute cardiac biofeedback, mindfulness, or positive psychology intervention performed by fourth-year medical students just before an OSCE did not improve their following academic performance. Still, students reported that the interventions helped them to enhance their performance. Future research should aim to further explore the perception of intervention on performance and potential long-term effects for students.
The study protocol was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05393219.
客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)是一项评估医学能力的压力测试。压力应对策略有望提高学生在OSCE中的表现。本研究旨在确定短期预防性应对干预对医学生考试表现的影响。
采用双臂双盲随机对照试验,并提出优势假设。研究邀请了2022年参加里昂东部大学OSCE的每一位四年级本科医学生参与,无排除标准。学生被随机分为四组:心脏生物反馈标准化呼吸组(BFB)、正念干预组(MBI)、积极心理干预组(PPI)或对照组(CTRL)。每项干预均通过视频指导,持续6分钟,在OSCE开始前进行。主要结果是OSCE学术成绩,由对干预不知情的大学考官通过特定评分表进行评估。次要结果包括具体表现分数,以及学生对干预对其表现影响的认知。
共纳入482名学生。与对照组相比,BFB组(-0.17 [95%CI,-1.20至0.86],P = 0.749)、MBI组(0.32 [95%CI,-0.71至1.36],P = 0.540)或PPI组(-0.25 [95%CI,-1.29至0.79],P = 0.637)的OSCE学术成绩及具体表现分数均无差异。与对照组相比,学生们认为干预对他们的表现有更积极的影响(BFB组+3 [95%CI,0 - 8],P < 0.001;MBI组+4 [95%CI,1 - 9],P = 0.040;PPI组+1 [95%CI,0 - 4],P = 0.040)。
四年级医学生在OSCE前进行的单次6分钟心脏生物反馈、正念或积极心理干预并未提高他们随后的学术成绩。不过,学生们报告称这些干预有助于他们提高表现。未来的研究应进一步探索干预对表现的认知以及对学生潜在的长期影响。
本研究方案已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,标识符:NCT05393219。