Wusthoff Courtney J, Numis Adam L, Pressler Ronit M, Chu Catherine J, Massey Shavonne, Clancy Robert R, Nguyen Sylvie, Hahn Cecil D, Scher Mark S, Pilon Betsy, King Donald T, Wong Hong-Nei, Tsuchida Tammy N, Riviello James J, Shellhaas Renée A
Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2025 Jan 1;42(1):1-11. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000001120. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
Continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring is increasingly used in the management of neonates with seizures. There remains debate on what clinically relevant information can be gained from cEEG in neonates with suspected seizures, at high risk for seizures, or with definite seizures, as well as the use of cEEG for prognosis in a variety of conditions. In this guideline, we address these questions using American Clinical Neurophysiology Society structured methodology for clinical guideline development.
A working group was formed from American Clinical Neurophysiology Society membership with expertise in neonatal cEEG and a set of priority questions developed. We performed literature searches in PubMed and EMBASE to identify relevant studies. Evidence tables were compiled from extracted data and quality assessments performed. A modification of the GRADE process was used to evaluate the body of evidence and draft recommendations.
Our working group identified six priority questions to evaluate the accuracy of cEEG for neonatal seizure diagnosis and the formulation of prognosis. An initial literature search yielded 18,167 results, which were distilled to a set of 217 articles. Overall, the quality of evidence for most priority questions was rated as very low and we provided conditional recommendations based on published literature and expert consensus. For each priority question, we also considered the benefits and harms of cEEG, with relative harms considered to be far less than the potential benefits across recommendations.
We present evidence-based clinical guidelines regarding indications for cEEG monitoring in neonates. Considering resource utilization and feasibility, when cEEG monitoring results have a likelihood of altering clinical decision making, the authors felt the resource investment was justifiable.
连续脑电图(cEEG)监测在新生儿癫痫管理中的应用越来越广泛。对于疑似癫痫、癫痫高危或确诊癫痫的新生儿,cEEG能提供哪些临床相关信息,以及cEEG在各种情况下用于预后评估的问题,仍存在争议。在本指南中,我们采用美国临床神经生理学会制定临床指南的结构化方法来解决这些问题。
成立了一个由美国临床神经生理学会成员组成的工作组,这些成员在新生儿cEEG方面具有专业知识,并提出了一系列优先问题。我们在PubMed和EMBASE上进行文献检索,以确定相关研究。从提取的数据中编制证据表并进行质量评估。采用GRADE流程的改进版来评估证据主体并起草建议。
我们的工作组确定了六个优先问题,以评估cEEG对新生儿癫痫诊断的准确性和预后的制定。初步文献检索产生了18167条结果,经过筛选后得到一组217篇文章。总体而言,大多数优先问题的证据质量被评为非常低,我们根据已发表的文献和专家共识提供了有条件的建议。对于每个优先问题,我们还考虑了cEEG的益处和危害,相对危害在各项建议中被认为远小于潜在益处。
我们提出了关于新生儿cEEG监测适应证的循证临床指南。考虑到资源利用和可行性,当cEEG监测结果有可能改变临床决策时,作者认为资源投入是合理的。