Bianchi Ilenia, Vitale Giulia, Focardi Martina, Capasso Emanuele, Galli Alessandro, Perrini Nicola, Sironi Emanuele, Pacciani Elsa, Pinchi Vilma
Laboratory of Personal Identification and Forensic Morphology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Forensic Pathology Unit, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2024 Dec 30;42(3):39-52. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14505540.
The age estimation of skeletal remains still represents a central issue not only for the reconstruction of the so-called "biological profile," but mostly for the palaeodemographic investigation. This research aims at verifying the feasibility of the adult age estimation method developed on living people by Pinchi et al. (2015 and 2018), for estimating the age at the death of 37 subjects from ancient populations found in two different Italian necropolis of archaeological interest (Mont'e Prama and Florence, X-IX century B.C and V-VI century A.D respectively). The method is conservative and based on a geometrical approximation of dental volumes of the upper central left incisors on CBCT scans. The statistical distribution of the age and errors followed the Bayesian approach proposed by Sironi et el. (2018) applying the "a priori" values according to the estimates/classification obtained with anthropological methods (morphological). Results show higher accuracy for Mont'e Prama remains than for the Florentine sample due to the different characteristics of the two ancient populations (estimates varying from 18.4 up to 28.7 years with a maximum error of 6,14 years for Mont'e Prama, and from 15.88 up to 43.37 years with a minimum error of 1 year up to a maximum error of 7,85 years for Florence). The method proposed and validated on modern living people can represent a reliable tool for estimating the age of ancient human remains with a significant palaeodemographic value for archaeologists/anthropologists. Mont'e Prama sample could be defined as a homogenous group of males aged around 20-30 years, probably warriors, soldiers, or athletes; Florentine sample as an inhomogeneous group of males and females from different families buried all together in a small area out of the city due to the probable occurrence of a special healthy emergency in the city.
骨骼遗骸的年龄估计仍然是一个核心问题,这不仅关乎所谓“生物特征”的重建,更主要的是对古人口统计学的研究。本研究旨在验证Pinchi等人(2015年和2018年)针对活人开发的成人年龄估计方法,用于估算来自意大利两个具有考古价值的不同墓地(蒙特普拉马和佛罗伦萨,分别为公元前9至8世纪和公元5至6世纪)古代人群中37名个体的死亡年龄。该方法较为保守,基于CBCT扫描上左上中切牙牙体积的几何近似。年龄和误差的统计分布遵循Sironi等人(2018年)提出的贝叶斯方法,根据人类学方法(形态学)获得的估计/分类应用“先验”值。结果表明,由于两个古代人群的不同特征,蒙特普拉马遗骸的估计准确性高于佛罗伦萨样本(蒙特普拉马的估计年龄在18.4至28.7岁之间,最大误差为6.14岁;佛罗伦萨的估计年龄在15.88至43.37岁之间,最小误差为1岁,最大误差为7.85岁)。在现代活人身上提出并验证的该方法,对于考古学家/人类学家而言,可能是一种可靠的工具,用于估计具有重要古人口统计学价值的古代人类遗骸的年龄。蒙特普拉马样本可定义为年龄在20至30岁左右的男性同质群体,可能是战士、士兵或运动员;佛罗伦萨样本则是来自不同家庭的男性和女性异质群体,因城市可能发生的特殊健康紧急情况而被一起埋葬在城外的一个小区域。