Taylor G J, Doody K
Psychother Psychosom. 1985;43(1):32-7. doi: 10.1159/000287855.
Previous studies have shown that measurement of verbal affective expression is influenced by the method used for obtaining speech samples, thereby supporting a situation-dependent, or state concept of alexithymia. In this study monadic speech samples obtained from 20 psychoneurotic and 20 psychosomatic patients, using selected thematic apperception test (TAT) cards, were examined using different methods of content analysis. Although no differences were found with the Gottschalk-Gleser anxiety, hostility outward and hope scales, the psychosomatic patients had a more limited emotional vocabulary than the psychoneurotic patients as measured by an 'affect vocabulary score' (AVS). In contrast to the Gottschalk-Gleser scores (GGS), the AVS correlated with measures of fantasizing ability and would appear to be a more valid method of measuring alexithymia. The findings also supported a trait concept rather than a state concept of alexithymia.
以往的研究表明,言语情感表达的测量会受到获取言语样本所使用方法的影响,从而支持了述情障碍的情境依赖或状态概念。在本研究中,使用选定的主题统觉测验(TAT)卡片,从20名精神神经症患者和20名身心疾病患者那里获取了独白言语样本,并采用不同的内容分析方法进行了检查。尽管在戈特沙尔克-格莱泽焦虑、外向敌意和希望量表上未发现差异,但通过“情感词汇得分”(AVS)测量发现,身心疾病患者的情感词汇比精神神经症患者更有限。与戈特沙尔克-格莱泽得分(GGS)不同,AVS与幻想能力的测量结果相关,似乎是一种更有效的测量述情障碍的方法。这些发现也支持了述情障碍的特质概念而非状态概念。