• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为患有饮食失调和功能性症状障碍的儿童和青少年整合身心健康服务:离散选择实验

Integration of physical and mental health services for children and young people with eating disorders and functional symptom disorders: discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Massou Efthalia, Basher Mike, Bennett Sophie D, Ford Tamsin, Gandhi Saheli, Heyman Isobel, Magnusson Josefine, Mehta Raj, Ng Pei Li, O'Curry Sara, Ramsay Angus I G, Fulop Naomi J, Morris Stephen

机构信息

Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK.

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Elizabeth House, Fulbourn, Cambridge, CB21 5EF, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 3;25(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12157-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-12157-8
PMID:39754205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11697723/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the increasing recognition of the value of greater integration of physical and mental health services for children and young people, we aimed to evaluate preferences among parents for the characteristics associated with integrated health service provision for two conditions (eating disorders, functional symptom disorders).

METHODS

Two discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were conducted, using electronic surveys. Participants were adult parents of children and young people. Choice scenarios were based on five attributes for the eating disorders study, and four attributes for the functional symptom disorders study.

RESULTS

Two hundred parents participated in each DCE. For eating disorders, days missed from school in the last year was the attribute valued most highly, followed by days in hospital in the last year, costs to the NHS, functioning, and interaction with peers with eating disorders. Respondents were willing to trade £531 of costs to the NHS for one less day missed from school. For functional symptom disorders, time to diagnosis was valued most highly, followed by days missed from school while obtaining a diagnosis, reservations about seeing a mental health practitioner, and costs of diagnosis to the NHS. Respondents were willing to trade £4237 of costs to the NHS to wait one month less for a diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Respondents' preferences were largely consistent with the planned goals of integrating physical and mental health services. Our findings show the factors which ought to be considered when designing new integrated pathways and evaluating them.

摘要

背景

鉴于越来越多的人认识到为儿童和青少年提供更综合的身心健康服务的价值,我们旨在评估家长对与两种疾病(饮食失调、功能性症状障碍)综合健康服务提供相关特征的偏好。

方法

使用电子调查进行了两项离散选择实验(DCE)。参与者是儿童和青少年的成年家长。选择场景基于饮食失调研究的五个属性和功能性症状障碍研究的四个属性。

结果

每项DCE有200名家长参与。对于饮食失调,去年缺课天数是最受重视的属性,其次是去年住院天数、英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的费用、功能以及与患有饮食失调症的同龄人互动。受访者愿意为少缺课一天而放弃NHS的531英镑费用。对于功能性症状障碍,诊断所需时间最受重视,其次是诊断期间缺课天数、对看心理健康从业者的顾虑以及NHS的诊断费用。受访者愿意为少等一个月诊断而放弃NHS的4237英镑费用。

结论

受访者的偏好与整合身心健康服务的计划目标在很大程度上一致。我们的研究结果表明了在设计新的综合路径并对其进行评估时应考虑的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/11697723/5715b5d50403/12913_2024_12157_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/11697723/3c831cf5d5b4/12913_2024_12157_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/11697723/5715b5d50403/12913_2024_12157_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/11697723/3c831cf5d5b4/12913_2024_12157_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/11697723/5715b5d50403/12913_2024_12157_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Integration of physical and mental health services for children and young people with eating disorders and functional symptom disorders: discrete choice experiment.为患有饮食失调和功能性症状障碍的儿童和青少年整合身心健康服务:离散选择实验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 3;25(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12157-8.
2
Systematic review of integrated mental and physical health services for children and young people with eating and functional symptoms.对患有饮食和功能症状的儿童及青少年的综合身心健康服务的系统评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jan 8:1-24. doi: 10.3310/ELPT1245.
3
Differences Between Users and Professionals in Preferences for Youth Mental Health Service Attributes: A Discrete Choice Experiment.青少年心理健康服务属性偏好方面用户与专业人员的差异:一项离散选择实验
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;19(2):e70012. doi: 10.1111/eip.70012.
4
Eating disorder services for young people in Ireland: perspectives of service providers, service users and the general adolescent population.爱尔兰针对青少年的饮食失调服务:服务提供者、服务使用者及普通青少年群体的观点
Ir J Psychol Med. 2018 Dec;35(4):301-309. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2015.66.
5
Preferences for Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up Care for Children: A Discrete Choice Experiment.儿童神经发育随访护理偏好的离散选择实验
Patient. 2024 Nov;17(6):645-662. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00717-3. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
6
Preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment.对集中式紧急医疗服务的偏好:离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 5;9(11):e030966. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030966.
7
Abortion care preferences and trade-offs when traveling out-of-state for facility-based services: findings from a discrete choice experiment.前往州外接受机构化服务时的堕胎护理偏好与权衡:离散选择实验的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1573. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12005-9.
8
Understanding parent preferences for NHS paediatric allergy services.了解家长对英国国家医疗服务体系儿科过敏服务的偏好。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2020 Oct;50(10):1159-1165. doi: 10.1111/cea.13712. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Public preferences and willingness to pay for a net zero NHS: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment in England and Scotland.公众对英国国民保健制度实现净零排放的偏好和支付意愿:英格兰和苏格兰离散选择实验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 21;14(6):e082863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082863.
10
Developing feasible person-centred care alternatives to emergency department responses for adults with epilepsy: a discrete choice analysis mixed-methods study.为癫痫成人制定可行的以患者为中心的护理替代急诊治疗方案:一项离散选择分析混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(24):1-158. doi: 10.3310/HKQW4129.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-sectional evaluation of health resource use in patients with functional neurological disorders referred to a tertiary neuroscience centre.转诊至三级神经科学中心的功能性神经障碍患者健康资源利用情况的横断面评估。
BMJ Neurol Open. 2024 May 22;6(1):e000606. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2023-000606. eCollection 2024.
2
Integrated care to address child and adolescent health in the 21st century: A clinical review.21世纪应对儿童和青少年健康问题的综合照护:一项临床综述。
JCPP Adv. 2021 Oct 23;1(4):e12045. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12045. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Heterogeneity in preferences for outcomes of integrated care for persons with multiple chronic diseases: a latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment.
多种慢性病患者整合护理结局偏好的异质性:离散选择实验的潜在类别分析。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Sep;31(9):2775-2789. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03147-6. Epub 2022 May 18.
4
Length of stay for anorexia nervosa: Systematic review and meta-analysis.神经性厌食症的住院时间:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2021 May;29(3):371-392. doi: 10.1002/erv.2820. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
5
Comparing patients' and other stakeholders' preferences for outcomes of integrated care for multimorbidity: a discrete choice experiment in eight European countries.比较多病种综合护理结果在患者和其他利益相关者中的偏好:八项欧洲国家的离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e037547. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037547.
6
Eating disorders.进食障碍。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):899-911. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30059-3.
7
Integrated Care Models and Child Health: A Meta-analysis.综合护理模式与儿童健康:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2020 Jan;145(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3747.
8
Patient preferences for management of high blood pressure in the UK: a discrete choice experiment.英国高血压管理中患者的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug 29;69(686):e629-e637. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705101. Print 2019 Sep.
9
Assessment and Management of Depression and Anxiety in Children and Adolescents with Epilepsy.儿童和青少年癫痫患者的抑郁和焦虑评估与管理。
Behav Neurol. 2019 May 2;2019:2571368. doi: 10.1155/2019/2571368. eCollection 2019.
10
The Next Step in Integrated Care: Universal Primary Mental Health Providers.一体化照护的下一步:普及基层心理健康服务提供者。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2020 Mar;27(1):115-126. doi: 10.1007/s10880-019-09626-2.