Hamm Rebecca F, Pattipati Sreya, Levine Lisa D, Parry Samuel, Srinivas Sindhu K, Beidas Rinad S
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 2 Silverstein, PA, Philadelphia, 19104, USA.
Perelman School of Medicine, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jan 3;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00681-x.
Studies have demonstrated that standardizing labor induction (IOL), often with the use of protocols, may reduce racial inequities in obstetrics. IOL protocols are complex, multi-component interventions. To target identified implementation barriers, audit and feedback (A&F) was selected as an implementation strategy. Here, we aimed to understand the acceptability and effect of A&F on fidelity to this complex intervention through quantitative and qualitative approaches.
This secondary analysis of a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (10/2018-12/2022) compared 2 years before (PRE) to 2 years after (POST) implementation of an IOL protocol at two sites. Fidelity to each of 8 specific protocol components was collected via chart review. During the POST period, unit-aggregated A&F reports were distributed via email every 3 months to site clinicians. Reports tracked fidelity to protocol components over time. For this analysis, we compared component fidelity PRE to POST-implementation. Additionally, during the POST period, we compared fidelity by month after each A&F (Month#1 v. Month#2/3) to evaluate the effect of A&F over time. Acceptability of A&F reports was evaluated using qualitative interviews.
8509 labor inductions were included (PRE = 4214, POST = 4295). A&F reports were successfully distributed every 3 months for the 2-year POST period. PRE to POST-implementation, fidelity to 4 of the 8 components increased significantly (cervical Foley utilization, latent labor examination frequency, amniotomy timing, and intrauterine pressure catheter utilization), without change in the other 4 components. For 2 of those 4 components where improvement was noted, there was no difference in fidelity by month after A&F report; rather, there was sustained improvement across the POST-implementation period. On the other hand, for the remaining 2 components, fidelity peaked in the first month after each A&F report, with some decline in the following 2 months prior to the next A&F report. Qualitative analysis (n = 24) supported A&F acceptability, with A&F described as "motivating" and "helpful."
A&F was an effective implementation strategy to promote fidelity to certain components of this labor induction protocol. With some decline in effect after the first month POST-A&F report, increased A&F frequency should be considered in future work targeting obstetric outcomes, as well as health inequities.
研究表明,通常通过使用方案来规范引产(IOL),可能会减少产科中的种族不平等现象。IOL方案是复杂的多成分干预措施。为了针对已确定的实施障碍,选择审核与反馈(A&F)作为一种实施策略。在此,我们旨在通过定量和定性方法了解A&F对这种复杂干预措施的依从性的可接受性和效果。
这项对I型混合有效性-实施试验(2018年10月至2022年12月)的二次分析,比较了在两个地点实施IOL方案前2年(PRE)和后2年(POST)的情况。通过病历审查收集对8个特定方案成分中每个成分的依从性。在POST期间,单位汇总的A&F报告每3个月通过电子邮件分发给各地点的临床医生。报告跟踪了随时间推移对方案成分的依从性。对于本分析,我们比较了实施前和实施后各成分的依从性。此外,在POST期间,我们比较了每次A&F后各月的依从性(第1个月与第2/3个月),以评估A&F随时间的效果。使用定性访谈评估A&F报告的可接受性。
纳入了8509例引产(PRE = 4214,POST = 4295)。在POST的2年期间,A&F报告每3个月成功分发一次。从实施前到实施后,8个成分中的4个成分的依从性显著提高(宫颈Foley导管的使用、潜伏期 labor检查频率、人工破膜时机和宫内压力导管的使用),其他4个成分没有变化。对于注意到有所改善的4个成分中的2个,在A&F报告后的各月依从性没有差异;相反,在整个实施后期间都有持续改善。另一方面,对于其余2个成分,依从性在每次A&F报告后的第一个月达到峰值,在下一次A&F报告前接下来的2个月有所下降。定性分析(n = 24)支持A&F的可接受性,A&F被描述为“有激励作用”和“有帮助”。
A&F是一种有效的实施策略,可促进对该引产方案某些成分的依从性。在A&F报告后的第一个月后效果有所下降,在未来针对产科结局以及健康不平等问题的工作中,应考虑增加A&F的频率。