Silverstein Todd P
Chemistry Department (emeritus), Willamette University, Salem, OR, USA.
Neuroscience. 2025 Feb 16;567:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.12.065. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
In two recent papers (Curr Trends Neurol 17: 83-98, 2023; J Neurophysiol 124: 1029-1044, 2020), James Lee has argued that his Transmembrane Electrostatically-Localized Cations (TELC) hypothesis offers a model of neuron transmembrane potentials that is superior to Hodgkin-Huxley classic cable theory and the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz (GHK) equation. Here we examine critically the arguments in these papers, finding key weaknesses and fallacies. We also examine closely the literature cited by Lee, and find (i) strong support for the GHK equation; (ii) published measurements that contradict TELC predictions; and (iii) no convincing support for the TELC hypothesis.
在最近的两篇论文(《当代神经学趋势》17: 83 - 98, 2023;《神经生理学杂志》124: 1029 - 1044, 2020)中,詹姆斯·李认为他的跨膜静电定位阳离子(TELC)假说提供了一种神经元跨膜电位模型,该模型优于霍奇金 - 赫胥黎经典电缆理论和戈德曼 - 霍奇金 - Katz(GHK)方程。在此,我们批判性地审视这些论文中的论点,发现关键弱点和谬误。我们还仔细研究了李引用的文献,发现(i)对GHK方程的有力支持;(ii)已发表的测量结果与TELC预测相矛盾;以及(iii)对TELC假说没有令人信服的支持。