Im Jennifer, Blakeney Erin Abu-Rish, Dotolo Danae, Ungar Anna, Barton Rebecca, Weiner Bryan J, Pollak Kathryn I, Nielsen Elizabeth, Hudson Lisa, Kentish-Barnes Nancy, Creutzfeldt Claire, Engelberg Ruth A, Curtis J Randall
Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine (J.I., E.A.R.B., D.D., A.U., E.N., C.C., R.A.E., J.R.C.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Health Systems and Population Health (J.I., B.J.W.), School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine (J.I., E.A.R.B., D.D., A.U., E.N., C.C., R.A.E., J.R.C.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics (E.A.R.B.), School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Apr;69(4):361-369.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.020. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
Critically-ill patients and their families often experience communication challenges during their ICU stay and across care transitions. An intervention using communication facilitators may help address these challenges.
Using clinicians' perspectives, we identified facilitators and barriers to implementing a communication intervention.
Using purposive sampling, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 clinicians from an intensive care unit at an academic health center that participated in a randomized trial of communication facilitators. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide data collection and analysis.
CFIR constructs of relative advantage, communication, and critical incidents facilitated the intervention's implementation. CFIR constructs of access to knowledge and information, relational connections, and clinician knowledge and belief hindered its implementation. Clinicians reported that facilitators provided continuity to patients and families, support in a trusting and proactive manner over transitions of care, and bridged communication between families and clinicians particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic. Limited information about the intervention prevented clinicians from working with facilitators earlier in the course of the intervention. Differences in beliefs regarding facilitator involvement during family meetings also hampered the intervention's implementation.
Future studies should incorporate implementation strategies that help connect facilitators to clinicians early in the intervention period which may improve role clarity and enhance collaboration.
重症患者及其家属在重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间以及整个护理过渡过程中经常面临沟通挑战。使用沟通促进者的干预措施可能有助于应对这些挑战。
从临床医生的角度出发,我们确定了实施沟通干预的促进因素和障碍。
采用目的抽样法,我们对一家学术健康中心重症监护病房的17名临床医生进行了半结构化访谈,这些医生参与了一项沟通促进者的随机试验。我们使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)来指导数据收集和分析。
CFIR的相对优势、沟通和关键事件等构建因素促进了干预措施的实施。CFIR的知识和信息获取、关系连接以及临床医生的知识和信念等构建因素阻碍了其实施。临床医生报告称,促进者为患者及其家属提供了连续性,在护理过渡期间以信任和积极主动的方式提供支持,特别是在新冠疫情期间,促进者在患者家属和临床医生之间架起了沟通的桥梁。关于干预措施的信息有限,使得临床医生无法在干预过程的早期与促进者合作。在家庭会议期间,对于促进者参与的信念差异也阻碍了干预措施的实施。
未来的研究应纳入一些实施策略,帮助在干预初期就将促进者与临床医生联系起来,这可能会提高角色清晰度并加强合作。