Hutchinson Rebecca N, Chiu Eric J, Belin Shane C, Klein-Fedyshin Michele, Impagliazzo Carolyn R, Costanza Lucia, Passarelli Joshua, Patel Pooja P, Sahay Sumedha, Shen Allison, Razskazovskiy Vladislav, Schenker Yael
Division of Palliative Medicine (R.N.H.), MaineHealth Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA; Tufts University School of Medicine (L.C., J.P., P.P.P., S.S.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics (E.J.C., S.C.B., Y.S.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Palliative Research Center (E.J.C., S.C.B., Y.S.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Apr;69(4):e303-e314. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.017. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
Specialty palliative care remains inaccessible for many with serious illness, especially in rural areas. Telehealth may be one solution.
To describe how telehealth increases access to specialty palliative care, describe facilitators and barriers to its use, and summarize evidence of patient benefits.
We conducted a systematic review using database-specific vocabulary and Boolean logic focusing on concepts "telemedicine," "remote consultation," "palliative medicine," and "hospice care." Included articles described original research evaluating a telehealth intervention addressing ≥2 National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care domains. Two researchers reviewed and abstracted articles; disagreements were resolved by consensus.
Of 13,928 articles identified, 150 were eligible. Of these, 112 involved telemedicine (direct care from a clinician to a patient); 15 involved tele coaching (connection of non-palliative care clinician with a palliative care specialist to increase primary palliative care skills); 16 involved e-health (an app to monitor symptoms); and 7 involved e-consults (connection to a palliative care clinician to advise on a particular case). About two-thirds (65%) of articles were published since 2020. Common barriers included broadband issues, lack of familiarity with technology, and lack of access to a device. Facilitators included having a technology-skilled assistant and providing a device. Few studies assessed patient outcomes.
While telehealth is widely used to increase access to specialty palliative care, more evidence is needed to evaluate effectiveness. Further research is needed to understand how to overcome barriers prominent in rural settings and to optimize integration of multiple modalities of telehealth in specialty palliative care.
许多重症患者仍无法获得专科姑息治疗,尤其是在农村地区。远程医疗可能是一种解决方案。
描述远程医疗如何增加专科姑息治疗的可及性,描述其使用的促进因素和障碍,并总结患者获益的证据。
我们使用特定数据库的词汇和布尔逻辑进行了一项系统综述,重点关注“远程医疗”“远程会诊”“姑息医学”和“临终关怀”等概念。纳入的文章描述了评估远程医疗干预措施的原始研究,该干预措施涉及≥2个《国家姑息治疗质量共识项目》领域。两名研究人员对文章进行了审查和摘要;分歧通过协商解决。
在识别出的13928篇文章中,150篇符合条件。其中,112篇涉及远程医疗(临床医生对患者的直接护理);15篇涉及远程指导(非姑息治疗临床医生与姑息治疗专家联系以提高初级姑息治疗技能);16篇涉及电子健康(用于监测症状的应用程序);7篇涉及电子会诊(与姑息治疗临床医生联系以就特定病例提供建议)。自2020年以来,约三分之二(65%)的文章已发表。常见障碍包括宽带问题、对技术不熟悉以及无法获得设备。促进因素包括有技术熟练的助手和提供设备。很少有研究评估患者结局。
虽然远程医疗被广泛用于增加专科姑息治疗的可及性,但仍需要更多证据来评估其有效性。需要进一步研究以了解如何克服农村地区突出的障碍,并优化远程医疗多种模式在专科姑息治疗中的整合。