Krishna Mahesh, Spartz Ellen J, Maas Laura, Cusumano Vivy, Sharma Sowmya, Limketkai Berkeley, Parian Alyssa
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Johns Hopkins University Department of Gastroenterology, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Feb;70(2):746-753. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08816-9. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
The armamentarium of medical therapies to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to grow, which has expanded treatment options, particularly after first biologic failure. Currently, there are limited studies investigating the predictive value of first biologic primary non-response (PNR) on subsequent biologic success. Our objective was to determine if PNR to the first biologic for IBD is predictive of response to subsequent biologic therapy.
A multicenter retrospective chart review study was performed with patients with IBD that received two or more biologics. PNR was defined as no clinical or symptomatic improvement after at least six weeks of treatment leading to cessation of drug. Patients who stopped their first biologic due to adverse side effects were classified in the intolerance group. Patients with initial significant response to biologic followed by a loss of response were classified as secondary loss of response (SLOR). Data analysis was performed with Python and Excel.
Of the 249 patients that met inclusion criteria, there were 87 patients with PNR, 96 patients with SLOR, and 66 patients with intolerance to their first biologic exposure. Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC: 41.3%, p = 0.0083) and IBD-unclassified (IC: 56.3%, p = 0.0099) were found to have a significantly higher rate of primary non-response compared to patients with Crohn's disease (CD: 25.0%). Patients on adalimumab for their first biologic had a significantly (p = 0.0014) higher rate of PNR (42.7%, UC: 50.0%, CD: 32.7%) compared to those on infliximab (23.0%, UC: 31.0%, CD: 12.1%). Patients with PNR did not have a higher rate of second biologic nonresponse when compared to patients who had SLOR or intolerance to their first biologic. Univariate analyses demonstrated no difference in rates of response to second biologic when switching intra-class or out-of-class.
Ulcerative colitis and IBDU have higher rates of PNR compared to Crohn's disease, but still have high response rates to second biologic agents. Adalimumab may be a suboptimal initial biologic given its higher PNR rate compared to infliximab. Our results support that there is an equally likely chance of response to second biologic after first biologic PNR. Subanalyses evaluating intraclass and out-of-class medication switching showed similar success.
治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)的药物疗法不断增加,这扩大了治疗选择,尤其是在首次生物制剂治疗失败之后。目前,关于首次生物制剂原发性无反应(PNR)对后续生物制剂治疗成功的预测价值的研究有限。我们的目的是确定IBD患者对第一种生物制剂的PNR是否可预测对后续生物制剂治疗的反应。
对接受两种或更多种生物制剂治疗的IBD患者进行了一项多中心回顾性病历审查研究。PNR定义为在至少六周的治疗后无临床或症状改善,导致药物停用。因不良反应而停用第一种生物制剂的患者被归类为不耐受组。对生物制剂最初有显著反应但随后失去反应的患者被归类为继发性反应丧失(SLOR)。使用Python和Excel进行数据分析。
在符合纳入标准的249例患者中,有87例PNR患者,96例SLOR患者,66例对首次生物制剂暴露不耐受的患者。与克罗恩病(CD:25.0%)患者相比,溃疡性结肠炎(UC:41.3%,p = 0.0083)和未分类IBD(IC:56.3%,p = 0.0099)患者的原发性无反应率显著更高。与接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的患者(23.0%,UC:31.0%,CD:12.1%)相比,接受阿达木单抗作为第一种生物制剂治疗的患者PNR率显著更高(p = 0.0014)(42.7%,UC:50.0%,CD:32.7%)。与SLOR或对第一种生物制剂不耐受的患者相比,PNR患者对第二种生物制剂无反应的发生率并不更高。单因素分析表明,在同类或不同类药物转换时,对第二种生物制剂的反应率没有差异。
与克罗恩病相比,溃疡性结肠炎和未分类IBD的PNR率更高,但对第二种生物制剂的反应率仍然很高。鉴于阿达木单抗的PNR率高于英夫利昔单抗,它可能不是最佳的初始生物制剂。我们的结果支持在首次生物制剂PNR后对第二种生物制剂有同等的反应机会。评估同类和不同类药物转换的亚分析显示了相似的成功率。