Tendi William, Mirza Hendy
Department of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Department of Urology, Persahabatan General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Jan;126:110823. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.110823. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
In adult patients, most ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) occurs secondarily. Concurrent UPJO with nephrolithiasis is not rare and simultaneous treatment by performing laparoscopic pyeloplasty and endoscopic stone removal has been suggested. In the case of atypical anatomy or previously failed pyeloplasty, a laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy is preferred. This study presents a case where a severe UPJO coexistence with renal stone was treated with laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy and direct lithotripsy using ShockPulse lithotripter through the laparoscopic port.
A 24-year-old male with a history of bilateral open pyelolithotomy came with left flank pain. Further examination revealed a left UPJO and multiple nephrolithiasis. During laparoscopic pyeloplasty, significant adhesion and fibrosis were encountered around the ureteropelvic junction, rendered it challenging to perform pyeloplasty. Consequently, left ureterocalicostomy and direct lithotripsy using ShockPulse lithotripter through the laparoscopic working port were performed. After 3 months, the double-J stent was removed with no complication.
The typical minimal invasive options for stone removal for UPJO with large or multiple nephrolithiasis are through percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) or direct stone removal during laparoscopy. However, by using the ShockPulse lithotripter, large or multiple calculi can be easily fragmented and siphoned through the laparoscopic port. This technique might help to shorten the operative time and reduce the risk of migrating stone to the abdominal cavity after opening the inferior calyx.
Simultaneous lithotripsy using ShockPulse lithotripter during laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy is a safe and feasible option in treating complex UPJO concurrent with renal stone.
在成年患者中,大多数肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)是继发性的。UPJO合并肾结石并不罕见,有人建议通过腹腔镜肾盂成形术和内镜下取石术同时进行治疗。对于解剖结构不典型或既往肾盂成形术失败的情况,腹腔镜输尿管肾盂造口术是首选。本研究介绍了一例通过腹腔镜输尿管肾盂造口术及经腹腔镜操作孔使用ShockPulse碎石机直接碎石治疗严重UPJO合并肾结石的病例。
一名有双侧开放性肾盂切开取石术病史的24岁男性因左侧腰痛前来就诊。进一步检查发现左侧UPJO和多发性肾结石。在腹腔镜肾盂成形术过程中,肾盂输尿管连接部周围出现明显粘连和纤维化,使得进行肾盂成形术具有挑战性。因此,实施了左侧输尿管肾盂造口术,并经腹腔镜操作孔使用ShockPulse碎石机直接碎石。3个月后,取出双J支架,无并发症发生。
对于合并大的或多发性肾结石的UPJO,典型的微创取石选择是经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或在腹腔镜手术期间直接取石。然而,通过使用ShockPulse碎石机,大的或多发性结石可以很容易地被击碎并通过腹腔镜操作孔吸出。该技术可能有助于缩短手术时间,并降低打开下肾盏后结石移入腹腔的风险。
在腹腔镜输尿管肾盂造口术期间使用ShockPulse碎石机同时碎石是治疗复杂UPJO合并肾结石的一种安全可行的选择。