Gopinath Thilak P S, Mande Tanaya, Rajendra Vinay Kumar J, Kishan Prasad H L, Hegde Padmaraj J
Nitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, India.
Nitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, India.
Oral Oncol. 2025 Feb;161:107159. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107159. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
Depth of invasion (DOI) significantly influences prognosis and treatment strategies in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Accurate preoperative imaging, such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), alongside postoperative histopathological evaluations, aids in determining DOI. This study evaluates the correlation between radiological DOI (rDOI), macroscopic DOI (PDOI), and microscopic DOI (pDOI) in OSCC.
This study included 54 OSCC patients from April 2022 to November 2023. rDOI was assessed using preoperative CECT, while PDOI and pDOI were measured through histopathological examination of resected specimens. Spearman correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between DOI measurements, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Strong correlations were found between rDOI and PDOI (r = 0.713), rDOI and pDOI (r = 0.688), and PDOI and pDOI (r = 0.897, p < 0.001 for all). CECT overestimated DOI in T1 and T2 lesions, particularly in ulcerative tumors. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences of 1.86 mm (rDOI-PDOI) and 3.3 mm (rDOI-pDOI). Higher correlations were observed in the presence of perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and worst pattern of invasion 5 (WPOI 5), with r values up to 0.948 (rDOI-PDOI) and 0.980 (PDOI-pDOI).
While rDOI correlates strongly with pathological DOI, overestimations in smaller and ulcerative lesions necessitate cautious interpretation. Pathological risk factors, including PNI, LVI, and WPOI 5, were associated with greater DOI and enhanced agreement between radiological and pathological assessments. Overall, CECT is a reliable tool for preoperative evaluation of DOI.
浸润深度(DOI)对口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)的预后和治疗策略有显著影响。准确的术前成像,如增强计算机断层扫描(CECT),与术后组织病理学评估一起,有助于确定DOI。本研究评估了OSCC中放射学DOI(rDOI)、宏观DOI(PDOI)和微观DOI(pDOI)之间的相关性。
本研究纳入了2022年4月至2023年11月期间的54例OSCC患者。rDOI通过术前CECT评估,而PDOI和pDOI通过对切除标本的组织病理学检查测量。Spearman相关性分析和Bland-Altman图评估了DOI测量之间的一致性,统计学显著性设定为p < 0.05。
rDOI与PDOI(r = 0.713)、rDOI与pDOI(r = 0.688)以及PDOI与pDOI(r = 0.897,所有p均< 0.001)之间存在强相关性。CECT在T1和T2病变中高估了DOI,尤其是在溃疡性肿瘤中。Bland-Altman分析显示平均差异为1.86毫米(rDOI - PDOI)和3.3毫米(rDOI - pDOI)。在存在神经周围浸润(PNI)、淋巴管浸润(LVI)和最差浸润模式5(WPOI 5)的情况下观察到更高的相关性,r值高达0.948(rDOI - PDOI)和0.980(PDOI - pDOI)。
虽然rDOI与病理DOI密切相关,但在较小和溃疡性病变中的高估需要谨慎解读。包括PNI、LVI和WPOI 5在内的病理危险因素与更大的DOI相关,并增强了放射学和病理学评估之间的一致性。总体而言,CECT是术前评估DOI的可靠工具。