• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用两种分类法在电子健康记录中实施肿瘤护理计划:一项试点研究。

Implementing Oncologic Nursing Care Plans in Electronic Health Records With Two Taxonomies: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Togni Serena, Saracino Lucia, Cieri Mariangela, Bianco Rosita, Terzoni Stefano, Giulia Santini Magda, Zito Emanuela, Lusignani Maura, Silvia Pazzaglia Maria, Depalma Letizia

机构信息

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

West J Nurs Res. 2025 Mar;47(3):159-168. doi: 10.1177/01939459241310402. Epub 2025 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1177/01939459241310402
PMID:39758050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11812278/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nursing care plans document the nursing process, displaying actions, and illustrating expected outcomes. Their integration into electronic health records (EHRs) is critical for accurate documentation, enhanced by standardized nursing terminologies that promote communication, critical reasoning, and patient safety through consistent language for information.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify appropriate standardized nursing terminology tailored to the context of a Northern Italian Cancer Center and research facility for developing nursing care plans and starting their integration into institutional EHRs.

METHODS

Participatory action research was conducted to select proper terminology respecting the oncological setting, develop nursing care plans, and start their implementation in EHRs. The nursing team of a pilot ward collaborated closely with the researchers as coresearchers. Care plan samples were presented using the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association-International Nursing Intervention Classification, Nursing Outcomes Classification, and International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) in the test section of the EHRs to gather nurses' preferences. Quantitative data collection, focus groups, and survey analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Nurses chose the ICNP for its flexibility but sought better methods to define patient severity in assessments and outcomes. They suggested incorporating the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to enable context-sensitive care plans.

CONCLUSIONS

End-user involvement is essential for developing EHRs, enhancing system usability, and reducing implementation resistance. Including nurses in management decisions empowers them, and improves care quality.

摘要

背景

护理计划记录了护理过程,展示了护理措施,并说明了预期结果。将其整合到电子健康记录(EHR)中对于准确记录至关重要,标准化护理术语通过一致的信息语言促进沟通、批判性推理和患者安全,从而增强了这种记录。

目的

本研究旨在确定适合意大利北部癌症中心和研究机构背景的标准化护理术语,以制定护理计划并开始将其整合到机构电子健康记录中。

方法

开展参与式行动研究,以选择符合肿瘤学背景的合适术语,制定护理计划,并开始在电子健康记录中实施。一个试点病房的护理团队作为共同研究者与研究人员密切合作。在电子健康记录的测试部分使用北美护理诊断协会-国际护理干预分类、护理结果分类和国际护理实践分类(ICNP)展示护理计划样本,以收集护士的偏好。进行了定量数据收集、焦点小组讨论和调查分析。

结果

护士们选择ICNP是因其灵活性,但寻求在评估和结果中更好地定义患者严重程度的方法。他们建议纳入不良事件通用术语标准,以制定情境敏感的护理计划。

结论

最终用户的参与对于开发电子健康记录、提高系统可用性和减少实施阻力至关重要。让护士参与管理决策赋予了他们权力,并提高了护理质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f68c/11812278/f73c97c37b70/10.1177_01939459241310402-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f68c/11812278/f73c97c37b70/10.1177_01939459241310402-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f68c/11812278/f73c97c37b70/10.1177_01939459241310402-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementing Oncologic Nursing Care Plans in Electronic Health Records With Two Taxonomies: A Pilot Study.使用两种分类法在电子健康记录中实施肿瘤护理计划:一项试点研究。
West J Nurs Res. 2025 Mar;47(3):159-168. doi: 10.1177/01939459241310402. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
2
Use of Electronic and Paper-based Standardized Nursing Care Plans to Improve Nurses' Documentation Quality in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital.使用电子和纸质标准化护理计划提高尼日利亚一家教学医院护士的文件记录质量。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2019 Oct;30(4):219-227. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12232. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
3
Use of electronic health records and standardized terminologies: A nationwide survey of nursing staff experiences.使用电子健康记录和标准化术语:全国范围内护理人员体验的调查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Apr;104:103523. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103523. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
4
The Pilot Evaluation of Using the International Classification for Nursing Practice.使用国际护理实践分类法的试点评估
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:437-41.
5
Success Criteria for Implementing Standardized Care Plans in Community Health Care.在社区医疗保健中实施标准化护理计划的成功标准。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:1070-1.
6
A comparison between the ICNP and the ICF for expressing nursing content in the electronic health record.《国际疾病分类临床修订版与国际功能、残疾和健康分类在电子健康记录中表达护理内容的比较》
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Oct;154:104544. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104544. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
7
Standardizing nursing data extracted from electronic health records for integration into a statewide clinical data research network.标准化从电子健康记录中提取的护理数据,以整合到全州临床数据研究网络中。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Mar;183:105325. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105325. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
8
Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-recognized standardized nursing terminologies: a systematic review.现有美国护士协会认可的标准化护理术语的证据:一项系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Aug;51(8):1160-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
9
Developing a subset of ICNP nursing diagnoses for medical and surgical hospital settings, informed by an Italian nursing conceptual model: a multicenter cross-sectional study.基于意大利护理概念模型,为内科和外科医院环境开发国际护理实践分类(ICNP)护理诊断的一个子集:一项多中心横断面研究。
Ann Ig. 2018 Jan-Feb;30(1):21-33. doi: 10.7416/ai.2018.2192.
10
Advanced Nursing Process quality: Comparing the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) with the NANDA-International (NANDA-I) and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC).高级护理程序质量:比较国际护理实践分类法(ICNP)与国际护士会护理诊断分类(NANDA - I)及护理干预分类法(NIC)。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Feb;26(3-4):379-387. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13387. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
An Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc., Diagnostic Classification Among Spanish Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.西班牙护士对国际护士会(NANDA)诊断分类的评估:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(3):79. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15030079.

本文引用的文献

1
Creating Subsets of International Classification for Nursing Practice Precoordinated Concepts: Diagnoses/Outcomes and Interventions Categorized Into Areas of Nursing Practice.创建国际护理实践分类预协调概念的子集:按护理实践领域分类的诊断/结果和干预措施
Comput Inform Nurs. 2024 Jan 1;42(1):21-26. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001072.
2
Individual and Team Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technology by Nurses: A Systematic Review.影响护士采用信息通信技术的个人和团队因素:一项系统综述。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2022 Apr 23;41(4):205-14. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000931.
3
Barriers to Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems from the Perspective of Nurses: A Cross-sectional Study.
护士视角下电子健康记录系统采用的障碍:一项横断面研究。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 Nov 15;40(4):236-243. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000848.
4
A comparison between the ICNP and the ICF for expressing nursing content in the electronic health record.《国际疾病分类临床修订版与国际功能、残疾和健康分类在电子健康记录中表达护理内容的比较》
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Oct;154:104544. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104544. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
5
Persisting workarounds in Electronic Health Record System use: types, risks and benefits.电子健康记录系统使用中的持续工作变通办法:类型、风险和惠益。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 8;21(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01548-0.
6
Participatory Methods to Engage Health Service Users in the Development of Electronic Health Resources: Systematic Review.让卫生服务使用者参与电子健康资源开发的参与式方法:系统评价
J Particip Med. 2019 Feb 22;11(1):e11474. doi: 10.2196/11474.
7
MHS Genesis Implementation: Strategies in Support of Successful EHR Conversion.MHS Genesis 实施:支持成功电子健康记录转换的策略。
Mil Med. 2020 Sep 18;185(9-10):e1520-e1527. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa184.
8
Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process.定性内容分析过程中的抽象和解释。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Aug;108:103632. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632. Epub 2020 May 15.
9
Reinterpreting the nursing record for an electronic context.重新诠释电子环境下的护理记录。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jul;127:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.021. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
10
Use of Electronic and Paper-based Standardized Nursing Care Plans to Improve Nurses' Documentation Quality in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital.使用电子和纸质标准化护理计划提高尼日利亚一家教学医院护士的文件记录质量。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2019 Oct;30(4):219-227. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12232. Epub 2018 Dec 7.