Dujc Ines, Žvanut Boštjan, Karnjuš Igor
University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences, Polje 42, 6310 Izola, Slovenia.
Zdr Varst. 2025 Jan 2;64(1):32-39. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2025-0005. eCollection 2025 Mar.
In Slovenia, the practice of having family present during resuscitation (FPDR) in the clinical setting is still controversial. Therefore, the aim of the study was to explore current public perceptions regarding FPDR in Slovenia and to investigate whether demographic characteristics are related to these perceptions.
A cross-sectional study was conducted using the FPDR Benefit-Risk Scale (BRS) to collect data from a sample of 618 participants. The FPDR-BRS includes 23 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). The online survey was conducted from 15 September to 30 December 2023. Inferential statistics were computed using IBM SPSS version 25.
The results indicate moderately favourable attitudes towards FPDR among participants in general. Older individuals (aged 60-82) and respondents not affiliated with the healthcare sector scored higher on the overall FPDR-BRS, indicating more favourable attitudes towards the practice of FPDR. Respondents who had previous experience with cardiopulmonary resuscitation were less concerned that FPDR could cause psychological trauma to family members.
These findings have significant implications for the adoption of FPDR policies and practices in the healthcare sector. Healthcare providers should prioritise education, training and support as the presence of family members during resuscitation becomes more widely accepted.
在斯洛文尼亚，临床环境中复苏时让家属在场（FPDR）的做法仍存在争议。因此，本研究的目的是探讨斯洛文尼亚公众目前对FPDR的看法，并调查人口统计学特征是否与这些看法相关。
采用FPDR益处-风险量表（BRS）进行横断面研究，从618名参与者的样本中收集数据。FPDR-BRS包括23个项目，采用5点李克特量表评分（1 = 强烈不同意至5 = 强烈同意）。在线调查于2023年9月15日至12月30日进行。使用IBM SPSS 25版进行推断统计。
结果表明，总体而言，参与者对FPDR持适度积极的态度。年龄较大的个体（60 - 82岁）和与医疗保健部门无关的受访者在FPDR-BRS总分上得分较高，表明对FPDR做法的态度更为积极。有过心肺复苏经验的受访者不太担心FPDR会给家庭成员造成心理创伤。
这些发现对医疗保健部门采用FPDR政策和做法具有重要意义。随着复苏时家属在场越来越被广泛接受，医疗保健提供者应将教育、培训和支持作为优先事项。
