Bitter Bradon, Terry Amy, Helmer Stephen D, Quinn Karson R, Haan James M
Department of Surgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas.
Ascension Via Christi Hospital Saint Francis, Wichita, Kansas.
Kans J Med. 2024 Nov 15;17(6):133-135. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol17.22152. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
The aim of this study was to assess the percentage of trauma patients admitted and receiving intervention, and to identify which of these interventions were performed by non-trauma specialists.
The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of all adult patients who presented to the trauma service between January 2019 and June 2019. Collected data included demographics, trauma activation level, total interventions performed, interventions performed by the trauma team, interventions performed by subspecialty teams, and isolated injuries requiring orthopedic, neurosurgical, or other specialized care. Descriptive analyses were used to evaluate the data.
The authors reviewed a total of 287 patient charts. Of these, 111 patients (38.7%) underwent operative intervention. Seventy-five patients (26.1%) received operative intervention from the orthopedic surgery team, 16 patients (5.6%) from the neurosurgery team, and 14 patients (4.9%) from other subspecialty teams. Only six patients (2.1%) underwent operative intervention by the trauma team.
The data suggest that many trauma admissions do not require trauma team interventions. This highlights the potential need to reassess the criteria for admitting trauma patients.
本研究的目的是评估入院并接受干预的创伤患者的比例,并确定这些干预措施中哪些是由非创伤专科医生实施的。
作者对2019年1月至2019年6月期间到创伤科就诊的所有成年患者进行了回顾性病历审查。收集的数据包括人口统计学资料、创伤激活水平、实施的总干预措施、创伤团队实施的干预措施、亚专科团队实施的干预措施,以及需要骨科、神经外科或其他专科护理的孤立损伤。采用描述性分析来评估数据。
作者共审查了287份患者病历。其中,111名患者(38.7%)接受了手术干预。75名患者(26.1%)接受了骨科手术团队的手术干预,16名患者(5.6%)接受了神经外科团队的手术干预,14名患者(4.9%)接受了其他亚专科团队的手术干预。只有6名患者(2.1%)接受了创伤团队的手术干预。
数据表明,许多创伤入院患者不需要创伤团队的干预。这凸显了重新评估创伤患者入院标准的潜在必要性。