Suppr超能文献

美国腹部枪伤非手术治疗的演变。

The Evolution of Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Gunshot Wounds in the United States.

机构信息

Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2020 Sep;253:224-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.053. Epub 2020 May 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical exploration for gunshot wounds to the abdomen has been a surgical standard for the greater part of the past century. Recently, nonoperative management (NOM) has been deemed as a safe option for abdominal gunshot wounds (AGWs). The aim of this analysis was to review the utilization of NOM and mortality after AGWs.

METHODS

We performed a 2010-2014 retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality and Improvement Program. We included all adult (aged 18 and older) patients with AGWs. NOM was defined as nonsurgical intervention within the first 6 h. Outcome measures were trends of utilization of NOM and mortality. Cochrane-Armitage trend analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 808,272 trauma patients were identified, and 16,866 patients with AGWs were included. During the study period, the incidence of AGWs increased, whereas the proportion of bowel injury (P = 0.75) and solid organ injury (P = 0.44) did not change. The NOM rate of AGW increased (2010: 19.5% versus 2014: 27%, P < 0.001). This was accompanied by a decrease in mortality rate (11% versus 9.4%, P = 0.01). Likewise, there was an increase in the use of angiography (7.5% versus 27%, P < 0.001) and laparoscopy (0.9% versus 2.6%, P < 0.001). Overall, 9.8% of the patients had failed NOM. There was no difference in mortality in patients who were managed successfully or failed NOM (5% versus 4.6%, P = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

NOM of AGW is more prevalent and is associated with a decrease in mortality rate. Selective NOM may be practiced safely after AGWs.

摘要

背景

在过去的大部分时间里,对腹部枪伤进行手术探查一直是外科的标准治疗方法。最近,非手术治疗(NOM)被认为是腹部枪伤(AGW)的一种安全选择。本分析的目的是回顾 AGW 中 NOM 的应用和死亡率。

方法

我们对美国外科医师学会创伤质量和改进计划(2010-2014 年)进行了回顾性分析。我们纳入了所有年龄在 18 岁及以上的 AGW 成年患者。NOM 定义为伤后 6 小时内非手术干预。观察指标为 NOM 应用和死亡率的趋势。采用 Cochrane-Armitage 趋势分析。

结果

共纳入 808272 例创伤患者,其中 16866 例为 AGW 患者。研究期间,AGW 的发病率增加,而肠损伤(P=0.75)和实质脏器损伤(P=0.44)的比例无变化。AGW 的 NOM 率增加(2010 年:19.5%,2014 年:27%,P<0.001)。这伴随着死亡率的下降(11%比 9.4%,P=0.01)。同样,血管造影(7.5%比 27%,P<0.001)和腹腔镜检查(0.9%比 2.6%,P<0.001)的应用也增加了。总体而言,9.8%的患者 NOM 治疗失败。成功或失败的 NOM 治疗的患者死亡率无差异(5%比 4.6%,P=0.45)。

结论

AGW 的 NOM 更为普遍,且与死亡率下降相关。AGW 后可安全选择性地施行 NOM。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验