Bui Linda Tm, Shadbegian Ron, Klemick Heather, Guignet Dennis, Margolit Rebecca, Hoang Anh
Brandeis University.
Appalachian State University.
Rev Environ Econ Policy. 2024 Aug;18(2):261-278. doi: 10.1086/730899.
Preventing childhood lead exposure has been at the forefront of environmental and public health policy in the United States for decades. When prevention fails and children are exposed to lead, secondary interventions are often used to mitigate the adverse effects. We review the literature on the effectiveness of secondary interventions used to treat children with elevated blood lead levels (BLL). We find that the literature is dominated by null and inconclusive findings about the effectiveness of secondary interventions on children's BLLs. Furthermore, few studies examine the effects of these interventions on the cognitive, behavioral, and other health outcomes that are the hallmarks of children's lead exposure and result in long-term labor market and economic consequences. This means that surprisingly little is known about whether secondary interventions mitigate or reverse the damage to children exposed to lead.
几十年来,预防儿童铅暴露一直是美国环境与公共卫生政策的首要任务。当预防措施失效且儿童接触到铅时,往往会采取二级干预措施来减轻不良影响。我们回顾了关于用于治疗血铅水平(BLL)升高儿童的二级干预措施有效性的文献。我们发现,关于二级干预措施对儿童血铅水平有效性的文献大多是无效和不确定的结果。此外,很少有研究考察这些干预措施对认知、行为和其他健康结果的影响,而这些结果是儿童铅暴露的特征,并会导致长期的劳动力市场和经济后果。这意味着,令人惊讶的是,对于二级干预措施是否能减轻或逆转铅暴露对儿童造成的损害,我们知之甚少。