• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术台高度对声门上气道置入(I-gel)的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effect of table height on supraglottic airway insertion (I-gel): A randomized control trial.

作者信息

Kumari Poonam, Kumar Amarjeet, Sinha Chandni, Kumar Ajeet

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Oct-Dec;40(4):641-644. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_140_23. Epub 2024 Jul 19.

DOI:10.4103/joacp.joacp_140_23
PMID:39759044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11694869/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Both operating table height and patient level in relation to the anesthesiologist influence supraglottic airway device (SAD) insertion and task performance in terms of physical and mental workload. The aim of the study was to find out the appropriate table height during SAD insertion in terms of time taken for insertion, success rate, ease of insertion, and anesthesiologist comfort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, 90 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients, aged between 18 and 60 years, scheduled for elective surgery were recruited. Patients were divided into three groups of 30 each. During SAD insertion, the table height was adjusted so that the patient's forehead was at the level of 5 cm above the xiphoid process in group I, at the level of the xiphoid process in group II, and at the level of 5 cm below the xiphoid process in group III of the anesthesiologist. We measured SAD insertion time, first attempt success rate, ease of insertion, and anesthesiologist comfort during the procedure.

RESULTS

The SAD insertion time (in seconds) was lower in group III than in groups I and II, and a significant difference was found between the groups ( < 0.05). The mean ease of insertion score, anesthesiologist comfort, and the first-attempt success rate of SAD insertion were higher in group III than in groups I and II, and the difference among the groups was statistically significant ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the lower table height with the patient's forehead at the level of 5 cm below the xiphoid process of the anesthesiologist is ergonomically more efficient during SAD (I-gel) insertion. This table height is also more comfortable for the anesthesiologist during SAD placement.

摘要

背景与目的

手术台高度以及患者相对于麻醉医生的位置,都会影响声门上气道装置(SAD)的插入操作以及在体力和脑力负荷方面的任务表现。本研究的目的是,从插入所需时间、成功率、插入难易程度以及麻醉医生的舒适度方面,找出在插入SAD时合适的手术台高度。

材料与方法

在这项随机对照试验中,招募了90例年龄在18至60岁之间、计划进行择期手术的美国麻醉医师协会身体状况I级和II级患者。患者被分为三组,每组30人。在插入SAD期间,调整手术台高度,使得在第一组中患者的额头位于麻醉医生剑突水平上方5厘米处,在第二组中位于剑突水平,在第三组中位于剑突水平下方5厘米处。我们在操作过程中测量了SAD插入时间、首次尝试成功率、插入难易程度以及麻醉医生的舒适度。

结果

第三组的SAD插入时间(以秒计)低于第一组和第二组,且组间差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。第三组SAD插入的平均插入难易程度评分、麻醉医生舒适度以及首次尝试成功率均高于第一组和第二组,组间差异具有统计学意义(<0.05)。

结论

我们得出结论,在插入SAD(I-gel)时,将手术台高度降低,使患者额头位于麻醉医生剑突水平下方5厘米处,在人体工程学上效率更高。在放置SAD期间,这个手术台高度对麻醉医生来说也更舒适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b244/11694869/49a0bfd06e06/JOACP-40-641-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b244/11694869/aa92b6ea51d3/JOACP-40-641-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b244/11694869/49a0bfd06e06/JOACP-40-641-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b244/11694869/aa92b6ea51d3/JOACP-40-641-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b244/11694869/49a0bfd06e06/JOACP-40-641-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of table height on supraglottic airway insertion (I-gel): A randomized control trial.手术台高度对声门上气道置入(I-gel)的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Oct-Dec;40(4):641-644. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_140_23. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
Supraglottic Airway Devices for Elective Pediatric Anesthesia: I-gel versus Air-Q, Which is the Best?用于择期小儿麻醉的声门上气道装置:I-gel与Air-Q,哪一种最佳?
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):461-466. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_107_20. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
3
Effect of operation table height on ease of mask ventilation, laryngeal view, and endotracheal intubation success.手术台高度对面罩通气的难易程度、喉镜视野及气管插管成功率的影响。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jul-Sep;40(3):416-421. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_443_22. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
4
Comparison of three supraglottic airway devices for airway rescue in the prone position: A manikin-based study.三种声门上气道装置用于俯卧位气道救援的比较:一项基于人体模型的研究。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2015 Oct-Dec;8(4):188-92. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.166589.
5
Comparison of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway with the I-Gel Supraglottic Airway During the Bailey Manoeuvre in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery.择期手术成年患者在进行贝利操作时,Proseal喉罩气道与I-Gel声门上气道的比较。
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021 Apr;49(2):107-113. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2020.29569. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Comparison of I-gel and LMA Protector in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.喉罩与 LMA 喉罩保护型在腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 Jan;25(1):90-96. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_693_20.
7
Evaluating the Optimal Operating Table Height for ProSeal-LMA™ Insertion.评估 ProSeal-LMA™ 插入的最佳手术台高度。
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Nov 17;2022:5118362. doi: 10.1155/2022/5118362. eCollection 2022.
8
Supraglottic airway devices versus tracheal intubation for airway management during general anaesthesia in obese patients.肥胖患者全身麻醉期间声门上气道装置与气管插管用于气道管理的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 9;2013(9):CD010105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010105.pub2.
9
Sore throat following three adult supraglottic airway devices: A randomised controlled trial.三种成人声门上气道装置使用后咽痛的随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Jul;34(7):417-424. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000539.
10
To assess the efficacy of i-gel for ventilation, blind tracheal intubation and nasogastric tube insertion.评估i-gel在通气、盲法气管插管和鼻胃管插入方面的效果。
Anesth Essays Res. 2013 Jan-Apr;7(1):94-9. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.114012.

本文引用的文献

1
Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion.经口咽漏气压评估喉罩置入条件:盲探与喉镜引导置入的比较。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan 5;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0674-6.
2
Securing of supraglottic airway devices during position change and in prone position.在体位改变和俯卧位时确保声门上气道装置的安全。
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Mar;62(3):159-161. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_164_18.
3
Insertion of i-gel™ by the reversed technique improves the success rate and reduces the time taken for its placement: A prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional trial.
采用反向技术插入i-gel™可提高成功率并减少放置所需时间:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、干预性试验。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):226-230. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_395_16.
4
Muscle relaxant effects on insertion efficacy of the laryngeal mask ProSeal(®) in anesthetized patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial.肌肉松弛剂对麻醉患者喉罩ProSeal(®)置入效果的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Anesth. 2015 Aug;29(4):580-4. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-1982-3. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
5
Higher operating tables provide better laryngeal views for tracheal intubation.高操作台面可提供更好的气管插管喉部视野。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):749-55. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet428. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
6
Insertion of six different supraglottic airway devices whilst wearing chemical, biological, radiation, nuclear-personal protective equipment: a manikin study.佩戴化学、生物、辐射、核个人防护装备时插入六种不同的声门上气道装置:一项人体模型研究。
Anaesthesia. 2011 Nov;66(11):983-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06816.x. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
7
Head and neck position for direct laryngoscopy.直接喉镜检查时的头颈部位置。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Jul;113(1):103-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821c7e9c. Epub 2011 May 19.
8
Posture used by anaesthetists during laryngoscopy.麻醉医生在喉镜检查时采用的姿势。
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Nov;89(5):772-4.
9
An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery.一项关于腹腔镜手术最佳手术台高度的人体工程学研究。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):416-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8190-y. Epub 2001 Nov 16.
10
Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display.内窥镜手术中的任务表现受图像显示位置的影响。
Ann Surg. 1998 Apr;227(4):481-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199804000-00005.