• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥漫性双侧前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)3类改变报告为炎症及其与临床意义前列腺癌的关系:一项回顾性观察研究

Diffuse, Bilateral Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 Changes Reported as Inflammation and Their Relation to Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Sofi Junaid, Subedi Pradip, Pradhan Ameena

机构信息

Urology, Northwick Park Hospital - London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Dec 4;16(12):e75101. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75101. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.75101
PMID:39759731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11698263/
Abstract

Aim/Objective The aim of this study was to investigate if diffuse, bilateral PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) 3 changes, reported on MRI Prostate, harbour clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) within them. Methods Data from 108 men with diffuse, bilateral PI-RADS 3 changes on MRI of the prostate who underwent systematic prostate biopsy between January 2000 and November 2023 were analyzed. Histology results were classified as benign or malignant, and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines as ISUP GG (International Society for Urological Pathology Grade Group) 2 or higher. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results The analysis showed that 30.5% of men with bilateral diffuse PI-RADS 3 changes had a diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. There was a correlation (p-value < 0.05) of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd) to the diagnosis of cancer in these diffuse PI-RADS 3 changes. Conclusion The likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer in diffuse PI-RADS 3 changes is quite high, especially when associated with a high PSA density. Therefore, caution is necessary before deciding against biopsying these changes, even if they appear inflammatory on MRI.

摘要

目的/目标 本研究的目的是调查磁共振成像前列腺检查报告的双侧弥漫性PI-RADS(前列腺影像报告和数据系统)3级改变中是否存在具有临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa)。方法 分析了2000年1月至2023年11月期间108例前列腺磁共振成像显示双侧弥漫性PI-RADS 3级改变且接受了系统性前列腺穿刺活检的男性的数据。组织学结果分为良性或恶性,具有临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa)根据欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)指南定义为国际泌尿病理学会分级组(ISUP GG)2级或更高。使用SPSS 26.0软件(美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)进行数据分析。结果 分析显示,双侧弥漫性PI-RADS 3级改变的男性中有30.5%被诊断为具有临床意义的前列腺癌。在这些弥漫性PI-RADS 3级改变中,前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAd)与癌症诊断存在相关性(p值<0.05)。结论 弥漫性PI-RADS 3级改变中具有临床意义的前列腺癌的可能性相当高,尤其是与高PSA密度相关时。因此,即使这些改变在磁共振成像上看似为炎症,在决定不进行针对这些改变的活检之前也需要谨慎。

相似文献

1
Diffuse, Bilateral Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 Changes Reported as Inflammation and Their Relation to Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study.弥漫性双侧前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)3类改变报告为炎症及其与临床意义前列腺癌的关系:一项回顾性观察研究
Cureus. 2024 Dec 4;16(12):e75101. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75101. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.MRI PI-RADS 3 病变中前列腺癌检出的预测因素——三级中心的现实。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2023 Dec 20;95(4):11830. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2023.11830.
3
[Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].[基于MRI的PI-RADS评分与靶向活检病理结果的关系分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 23;45(11):942-947. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220805-00538.
4
A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.基于多参数磁共振成像检查结果,为国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级分组(GG)1 或 ISUP GG2 前列腺癌患者制定的主动监测候选者的新型列线图。
BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):104-113. doi: 10.1111/bju.15048. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
5
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
6
Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.PI-RADS v2.1 版中通过异常扩散加权成像升级的前列腺移行区非典型结节的前列腺癌患病率:与MRI引导下TRUS引导的靶向活检的相关性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Mar;216(3):683-690. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23932. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
Added Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Selecting Prostate Biopsy Candidates Among Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and PI-RADS ≥3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Systematic Assessment by PI-RADS Score.在前列腺特异性抗原和 PI-RADS≥3 病变的前列腺多参数磁共振成像中前列腺特异性抗原升高的男性中选择前列腺活检候选者时前列腺特异性抗原密度的附加价值:按 PI-RADS 评分进行系统评估。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jul;10(4):634-640. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.006. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
8
[Correlation analysis between prostate imaging report and data system score and pathological results of prostate cancer].[前列腺影像报告和数据系统评分与前列腺癌病理结果的相关性分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 15;100(34):2663-2668. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200523-01626.
9
Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS 3 Lesions Using T2w-Derived Radiomics Feature Maps in 3T Prostate MRI.利用 3T 前列腺 MRI 中 T2w 衍生的放射组学特征图谱检测 PI-RADS 3 病变中的临床显著前列腺癌。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):6814-6828. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31110503.
10
Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer.PI-RADS v2.1 联合 PSAD 对临床显著前列腺癌的诊断价值。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Oct;47(10):3574-3582. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03592-4. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Chronic Prostatitis on the PI-RADS Score 3: Proposal for the Addition of a Novel Binary Suffix.慢性前列腺炎对前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)3分的影响:关于添加一个新的二元后缀的提议
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 30;11(4):623. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040623.
2
Inflammation appears as high Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System scores on prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) leading to false positive MRI fusion biopsy.炎症在前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)上表现为高前列腺影像报告和数据系统评分,导致 MRI 融合活检出现假阳性。
Investig Clin Urol. 2019 Sep;60(5):388-395. doi: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.5.388. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
3
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2.1 版:前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版 2019 年更新。
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS™ Version 2 Using the International Society of Urological Pathology Prostate Cancer Grade Group System.PI-RADS™ 版本 2 的前瞻性评估:采用国际泌尿病理学会前列腺癌分级分组系统。
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):583-590. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.131. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.多参数 MRI 和 TRUS 活检在前列腺癌(PROMIS)中的诊断准确性:一项配对验证性研究。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
6
In-Bore 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2-based Diagnostic Performance for Detection of Prostate Cancer.3T磁共振引导下经直肠前列腺靶向活检:基于前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版检测前列腺癌的诊断性能
Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):130-139. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152827. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
7
mp-MRI Prostate Characterised PIRADS 3 Lesions are Associated with a Low Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer - A Retrospective Review of 92 Biopsied PIRADS 3 Lesions.磁共振成像(mp-MRI)特征性前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)3类病变与临床显著前列腺癌的低风险相关——对92例经活检的PIRADS 3类病变的回顾性研究
Curr Urol. 2015 Jul;8(2):96-100. doi: 10.1159/000365697. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
8
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议:分级模式的定义及新分级系统的建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
9
Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.前瞻性研究比较了经直肠超声引导活检与磁共振(MR)成像引导活检在无既往前列腺活检史男性中的前列腺癌检出率。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
10
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.磁共振成像在前列腺癌诊断和治疗中的作用。
BJU Int. 2013 Nov;112 Suppl 2:6-20. doi: 10.1111/bju.12381.