Waibel Jill, Nguyen Thu Q, Le Jennifer H T D, Qureshi Aamir, Ziegler Mary, Widgerow Alan, Meckfessel Matthew
J Drugs Dermatol. 2025 Jan 1;24(1):34-40. doi: 10.36849/JDD.8464.
Injectable biostimulator treatments stimulate endogenous collagen in aging skin, but whether they act through similar pathways is unknown. This study evaluates two biostimulatory agents' effects on genes, expressed proteins, and respective pathways as potential aging biomarkers and treatment outcomes.
This 13-week, randomized, single-center, comparative study compared volume change and gene expression stimulated by poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA-SCATM) and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA-R) via punch biopsy in the nasolabial fold (NLF). Subjects (n=21) had shallow NLF contour deficiencies on the wrinkle assessment scale (WAS) ≥2 and identical WAS scores on both sides of the nose. Biopsies at baseline and 90 days were analyzed for gene expression of targeted biomarkers. These results were assessed using the STRING and Reactome databases to determine functional pathways, as well as gene markers and their respective pathways.
Gene analysis suggested unique processes for each biostimulator. PLLA-SCA stimulated more components of the extracellular matrix with less inflammatory response, translating to a more regenerative pathway. CaHA-R elicited a more inflammatory response that could diminish tissue regeneration, translating to a pro-inflammatory pathway.
PLLA-SCA is associated with regenerative pathways, while CaHA-R did not show evidence of tissue regeneration and upregulated more genes in pro-inflammatory pathways. J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(1):34-40. doi:10.36849/JDD.8464R1.
可注射生物刺激剂治疗可刺激衰老皮肤中的内源性胶原蛋白,但它们是否通过相似途径发挥作用尚不清楚。本研究评估了两种生物刺激剂对基因、表达蛋白及各自途径的影响,将其作为潜在的衰老生物标志物和治疗结果。
这项为期13周的随机、单中心、对照研究,通过对鼻唇沟(NLF)进行打孔活检,比较了聚左旋乳酸(PLLA-SCATM)和羟基磷灰石钙(CaHA-R)刺激引起的体积变化和基因表达。受试者(n=21)在皱纹评估量表(WAS)上鼻唇沟轮廓浅度不足≥2,且鼻两侧的WAS评分相同。在基线和90天时进行活检,分析靶向生物标志物的基因表达。使用STRING和Reactome数据库评估这些结果,以确定功能途径以及基因标志物及其各自的途径。
基因分析表明每种生物刺激剂都有独特的作用过程。PLLA-SCA刺激了更多的细胞外基质成分,炎症反应较少,转化为更具再生性的途径。CaHA-R引发了更强的炎症反应,可能会减少组织再生,转化为促炎途径。
PLLA-SCA与再生途径相关,而CaHA-R未显示组织再生的证据,且在促炎途径中上调了更多基因。《药物皮肤病学杂志》。2025;24(1):34-40。doi:10.36849/JDD.8464R1。